Score
64. How do you verify if Microsoft Health is built right?
<--- Score
65. Are the measurements objective?
<--- Score
66. What are the costs and benefits?
<--- Score
67. What methods are feasible and acceptable to estimate the impact of reforms?
<--- Score
68. How do your measurements capture actionable Microsoft Health information for use in exceeding your customers expectations and securing your customers engagement?
<--- Score
69. How are costs allocated?
<--- Score
70. What kind of analytics data will be gathered?
<--- Score
71. What is measured? Why?
<--- Score
72. Did you tackle the cause or the symptom?
<--- Score
73. How to cause the change?
<--- Score
74. What is the cause of any Microsoft Health gaps?
<--- Score
75. Where can you go to verify the info?
<--- Score
76. Who pays the cost?
<--- Score
77. Have you included everything in your Microsoft Health cost models?
<--- Score
78. Why a Microsoft Health focus?
<--- Score
79. At what cost?
<--- Score
80. Are actual costs in line with budgeted costs?
<--- Score
81. Is the solution cost-effective?
<--- Score
82. Are there measurements based on task performance?
<--- Score
83. How can you reduce the costs of obtaining inputs?
<--- Score
84. What are the costs?
<--- Score
85. How is performance measured?
<--- Score
86. Have design-to-cost goals been established?
<--- Score
87. What could cause delays in the schedule?
<--- Score
88. What are allowable costs?
<--- Score
89. Will Microsoft Health have an impact on current business continuity, disaster recovery processes and/or infrastructure?
<--- Score
90. What harm might be caused?
<--- Score
91. What does losing customers cost your organization?
<--- Score
92. Are Microsoft Health vulnerabilities categorized and prioritized?
<--- Score
93. How do you verify and develop ideas and innovations?
<--- Score
94. What does verifying compliance entail?
<--- Score
95. What are your key Microsoft Health organizational performance measures, including key short and longer-term financial measures?
<--- Score
96. Are you able to realize any cost savings?
<--- Score
97. How do you stay flexible and focused to recognize larger Microsoft Health results?
<--- Score
98. Do the benefits outweigh the costs?
<--- Score
99. What is the cost of rework?
<--- Score
100. Which measures and indicators matter?
<--- Score
101. Are you aware of what could cause a problem?
<--- Score
102. What relevant entities could be measured?
<--- Score
103. How do you verify performance?
<--- Score
104. What potential environmental factors impact the Microsoft Health effort?
<--- Score
105. What are the estimated costs of proposed changes?
<--- Score
106. Where is it measured?
<--- Score
107. How do you measure variability?
<--- Score
108. What are the costs of delaying Microsoft Health action?
<--- Score
109. What does a Test Case verify?
<--- Score
110. The approach of traditional Microsoft Health works for detail complexity but is focused on a systematic approach rather than an understanding of the nature of systems themselves, what approach will permit your organization to deal with the kind of unpredictable emergent behaviors that dynamic complexity can introduce?
