Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
107. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
108. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
109. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
110. How does the Interval Laboratory manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
111. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
112. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
113. Is the Interval Laboratory scope manageable?
<--- Score
114. Will a Interval Laboratory production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
115. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
116. How do you manage changes in Interval Laboratory requirements?
<--- Score
117. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
118. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
119. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
120. Who approved the Interval Laboratory scope?
<--- Score
121. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Interval Laboratory results are met?
<--- Score
122. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
123. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
124. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
125. Has a Interval Laboratory requirement not been met?
<--- Score
126. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
127. Is Interval Laboratory currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
128. Is there a Interval Laboratory management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
129. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Interval Laboratory leverage and how?
<--- Score
130. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
131. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
132. How do you catch Interval Laboratory definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
133. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Interval Laboratory Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What do you measure and why?
<--- Score
2. What are you verifying?
<--- Score
3. How frequently do you verify your Interval Laboratory strategy?
<--- Score
4. What are your customers expectations and measures?
<--- Score
5. How will you measure success?
<--- Score
6. What are your primary costs, revenues, assets?
<--- Score
7. When a disaster occurs, who gets priority?
<--- Score
8. What tests verify requirements?
<--- Score
9. What are the uncertainties surrounding estimates of impact?
<--- Score
10. How do you verify the authenticity of the data and information used?
<--- Score
11. Do you have an issue in getting priority?
<--- Score
