often represented in terrifying bodily form, as in the famous exploits of St. Anthony. The desert fathers have long occupied a certain pride of place in Christian understanding, such that believers far from the desert and well removed from radical ascetic living champion these peculiar ascetics and, in some sense, made them their own.
All that is a bit romantic and far-fetched. The desert fathers often complained about far more mundane things like mere tedium or listlessness. Further, the romantic image of the previous paragraph suggests that the monks were primarily against certain things—the Roman world, their own bodies, the demons, and so on.1 Their self-understanding would have included not only an antagonistic posture but also, or even primarily, an affirming one: the pursuit of an unbridled life with God, in all its severe intimacy. This pursuit was not so individualistic as it often sounds. The monks did write down their exploits for others to read after all, else we wouldn’t have The Sayings of the Desert Fathers and other texts. Readers of these works become themselves a certain sort of “community” of those who find the monks worth reading for whatever reason. Further, the “desert became a city” to such a degree that monks often complained about the difficulty of finding the solitude they sought. It also made for opportunities for gracious service to others—as when the Cappadocian fathers turned what was once a desert into a city that provided hospital services and affordable housing—unheard of in the ancient world.2
Monastic communities have always avidly read the Sayings as guides to their own form of costly discipleship and hospitality. Yet their readership also includes those not personally committed to monastic asceticism, from communities whose traditions do not encourage monasticism as a form of Christian living. Mainline Protestant scholars once denigrated monasticism, as was the Reformers’ wont from the beginning. Yet mainline and evangelical Protestants are now turning to this literature to inform their own efforts at discipleship.3 Why?
One guess is the parallel between the political climate now and in the fourth century. We live in a time in which the church has been extraordinarily pliant in the hands of an imperial political regime that demands absolute allegiance. Christians unhappy with that dark alliance, and uninterested in trying to take over the wheel themselves and steer the church’s political commitments in another direction, may find solace in the Sayings. Another reason may simply be that anti-Catholic bias among Protestants has waned considerably in the last few generations. This may be for bad reasons—if we’re all consumers of religious feeling, what do our religious differences matter anyway? (We might as well attend to monasticism instead of to our own, say, Lutheranism, as we would decide on McDonalds instead of Hardees). All the same, the chastening of antagonism is something churches should celebrate. For good reason or ill, Christ is preached, and the church is closer to a demonstration of the “oneness” of which he spoke (John 17:21).
My own interest in monasticism is rather quotidian. While studying theology at Duke Divinity School, I imbibed a vision of radical discipleship embodied among Mennonites, especially John Howard Yoder, as transmitted by Stanley Hauerwas. If the church really is distinct from the world, both in its form of life and in its dramatic willingness to share communal goods (like money), where is such a church? As a Methodist learning my church heritage’s liturgical underpinnings, I was drawn to Catholic forms of liturgy. Where could one find an ecclesial space marked by liturgy done not just tastefully, but sacramentally—so that the presence of God was as palpable as it was in the liturgy about which the fathers and John Wesley speak?4
The answer for me was Mepkin Abbey—a Trappist monastery in Moncks Corner (no kidding!), South Carolina.5 The monks there knew their liturgy. The Liturgy of the Hours6 is the Catholic monastic worship and wisdom that has been handed on and elaborated through the centuries. They also boasted several trained musicians committed not to showing off but to leading worship. There is nothing more lovely than a plain, unaccompanied guitar helping dozens of monks to chant psalms. The worship in that space was as exquisite as any I could imagine. It made me love the psalms anew, and to want to memorize and chant Scripture and ancient prayers. It made me, in short, a better Protestant (!), if by that we mean someone committed to a love of Scripture and personal piety. A friend took a group of drug-troubled teenagers to another Trappist community once. After Lauds, a service of chanting psalms for an hour at 3:20 a.m., he overheard one student say to another, “Man, that was better than getting high.” Worship done right is its own form of intoxication.7
The liturgical space is breathtaking. It’s a bare room with white walls and wooden ceilings, but those ceilings are stories high, leaving ample space in which light and shadow can play, inviting the imagination toward prayer. The altar is a great stone slab in the middle of a circular apse, around which the monks gather for adoration during the Eucharistic liturgy. It looks like something you could sacrifice someone on—a not-inappropriate image for Catholic mass. The baptismal font is a similarly granite colored and massive structure, shaped like a diamond, set to bubble occasionally to remind us aurally of baptism. It needn’t do so, as monks and visitors alike are constantly touching it and crossing themselves to remember their baptism and give thanks. The monks face one another in their choir stalls, attentive more to the prayer books in front of them than to the people across the way. Those books are extraordinary—hand-written copies of the Psalter, done by monks from a sister abbey in Massachusetts, lovely in every letter. The silence in the space is beautiful, interrupted as it usually is only by the sound of baptismal water dripping off fingers or monks’ robes as they shuffle to their stalls. By contrast the bullfrogs and cicadas of low-country South Carolina roar to life outside, audible easily through the walls.
The liturgy is at times beautiful beyond words. The monks’ voices sound at once sad and exultant, as befits the psalms they sing. The Eucharistic liturgy occasionally approaches ballet in its beauty, as priests preside who wear the mass as comfortably as I do an old sweatshirt. My favorite moment is at once Catholic and Pentecostal: when the celebrant raises the host and chalice and says the words of institution, all those present who are ordained lift their hands; it is a glimpse of an undivided, sacramental and Pentecostal form of worship! Even the various prayers about and to Mary, on which Protestants occasionally must swallow hard, eventually wear down opposition by their beauty. One can see, even if fleetingly, how liturgy can suffice in place of worldly ambition, money, sex, and family.
These monks were also not dissimilar to the Anabaptist communities of nonviolence about which Yoder and Hauerwas write.8 They’re committed to nonviolence themselves, as all Catholic vowed priests and religious are. Mepkin’s prayers echo this commitment. On August 6 one year (the Feast of the Transfiguration), one brother prayed “for those transfigured this day in 1944 at Hiroshima,” in a startling overlay of images— one of angelic peace, one of demonic violence. Perhaps more important, the monks’ physical bearing exudes peace and reconciliation. Some are quite literally bowed slightly at the waste at all times, not just from age but from a constant habit of bowing toward Christ and one another in the liturgy. Worship should always mark us so dramatically. My wife, a Methodist preacher, tells of the monks’ posture in contrast to that of us visitors. During communion, for example, visitors stand in the circle around the altar as we are accustomed—arms crossed, posture slouched. The monks stand ready to bow, as they have countless times before.
These monks hardly live in the desert.9 Moncks Corner sits on the Ashley and Cooper Rivers as these two flow toward the harbor town of Charleston. My wife and I left the immaculate silence of the monastery one afternoon and were feasting on world-class crab cakes that night. Further, the “church” and the “world” are more intertwined in today’s monasticism. Mepkin Abbey seeks to serve scholars like me with a recently opened,
