have their say.
Sure enough, in the Next announcement we find a heading that says:
Chief Executive’s Review
Headlines
Sales up 3.6%
Profit up 8.5%
Earnings per share up 18.6%
Dividend up 2.5p to 27.5p
We have the original bullet points rehashed, this time with figures rather than percentages. So we now know the actual level of the dividend in pence and the increase in pence.
Further clues as to how the company is progressing, and thus the prospects for the final dividend, will be found in this review. So, again, reproducing from the Next announcement, we see:
Overview
Looking ahead to our full-year results, we believe that sales for the year will be between 2.0% and 4.5% ahead of last year, which would result in Group profits being up between +0.4% and +8.7% and EPS [Earnings Per Share] up between +7.5% and +16.4%.
Early indications are that retail headwinds are likely to ease as we move into 2012. We have strong evidence that there will be little or no inflation in our own prices and it seems probable that other inflationary pressures will ease as commodity price rises begin to annualise in the first quarter of 2012.
The overview may contain specific projected figures for the next quarter or, at the other extreme, a few meaningless platitudes. It may, as in this case, contain figures and a brief description of how events are unfolding. In any event the overview is quite likely to be short and we should not worry if it is brief provided it does actually tell us something.
Larger companies, especially those with international operations, may go into greater detail of how things are panning out in different parts of the business. There may also be greater detail if something momentous has happened, such as the scrapping of the dividend or the takeover of another company.
How useful any figures are depends on the company’s visibility of earnings. In the case of Next, it cannot reasonably see too far ahead as sales rely on the public mood and costs are at the mercy of volatile prices of energy and raw materials. Thus we have a wide spread in the forecasts for sales and profits.
The key part of the Next overview is that inflation, which had been running well above the Bank of England target of 2% for more than two years and was around 5% at the time of the statement, was easing off. Thus Next would have one less problem to cope with and would not be faced with trying to pass rising prices onto its customers.
Way, way down the statement, usually well after a series of tables showing the results and other figures, you will find something like this:
Dividend
The interim dividend is being increased by 2.5p to 27.5p. This will be paid on 3 January 2012 to shareholders on the register at 25 November 2011. The shares will trade ex-dividend from 23 November. For the full year we intend to raise the total of dividends payable by a similar percentage to the growth in basic earnings per share from continuing business.
This, as we can see, gives details of the size of the dividend, when it goes ex-dividend and when it will be paid.
In this case, although it does not always happen, we have the bonus of a clear indication of intent regarding the final dividend. Note that Next is clearly expecting to raise the final dividend, although not necessarily by the same percentage as it raised the interim dividend. Much will depend on where earnings per share come in within the 7.5% to 16.4% range indicated in the overview.
Within the tables contained in the announcement you will see one that tells you how much the dividend is costing the company:
Statement of changes in total equity
This simply records how much money the company paid out in dividends in the current period, in the comparable period of the previous year, and in the previous year as a whole. The figure appears in brackets because it is a payment made by the company rather than money received, just as, for example, interest payments made by the company are shown in brackets.
This figure will probably be of little interest to you. After all, your main concern is how much dividend per share you are getting. However, the figure can be useful to compare against profits and cash flow so you can be satisfied that the company can afford the dividend.
It is also useful if the company has issued shares in an acquisition, rights issue or placing. You can see if the total amount of the dividend has increased or whether the same amount of cash is being spread more thinly.
Note that, although Next’s final dividend is greater than its interim, it paid out more in dividends in the first half than in the second. This is quite normal. The paradox arises because the (smaller) interim dividend is paid out in the second half of the year while the (larger) final dividend falls into the following first half.
A company may feel moved to spell this out to readers, unfortunately not always in easy-to-understand terms, as this paragraph from the GlaxoSmithKline 2010 annual report demonstrates:
Under IFRS interim dividends are only recognised in the financial statements when paid and not when declared. GSK normally pays a dividend two quarters after the quarter to which it relates and one quarter after it is declared. The 2010 financial statements recognise those dividends paid in 2010, namely the third and fourth interim dividends for 2009 and the first and second interim dividends for 2010.
All Glaxo is saying is that its first two quarterly dividends appear in the accounts for the years in which they are declared, because they are paid before the financial year end, while dividends for the third and fourth quarters are paid after the year end and are therefore included in the following year’s accounts. Thus the accounts for 2010 show the amounts paid for the last two dividends of 2009 and only the first two for 2010. The two later 2010 dividends will be counted in the 2011 accounts.
On the whole, the annual report will tell you very little about the dividend that was not included in the results announcement. The exception is that the annual report will include a five-year record of dividend payments, something you rarely get in with the results. Thus DIY group Kingfisher included this table in its 2011 annual report:
Group five year financial summary
We can see that Kingfisher was transformed from a group struggling to cover its dividend even once to one with a progressive dividend policy and cover of nearly three times. This was achieved by reducing the dividend to a sustainable level and through a re-organisation in 2008-9 when asset writedowns almost wiped out earnings per share.
Note the importance of adjusted earnings per share in this table as this figure shows underlying earnings before exceptional items and gives a clearer picture of progress over the five years.
It would be useful if
