171
177 172
178 173
179 174
180 175
181 177
182 178
183 179
Series Editor
Marie-Christine Maurel
Mathematics in the Visual Arts
Edited by
Ruth Scheps
Marie-Christine Maurel
First published 2020 in Great Britain and the United States by ISTE Ltd and John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, this publication may only be reproduced, stored or transmitted, in any form or by any means, with the prior permission in writing of the publishers, or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms and licenses issued by the CLA. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside these terms should be sent to the publishers at the undermentioned address:
ISTE Ltd
27-37 St George’s Road
London SW19 4EU
UK
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
111 River Street
Hoboken, NJ 07030
USA
© ISTE Ltd 2020
The rights of Ruth Scheps and Marie-Christine Maurel to be identified as the authors of this work have been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
Library of Congress Control Number: 2020942150
British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data
A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library
ISBN 978-1-78630-681-4
Introduction
The presence of mathematics in the arts has been plain since at least Pythagoras’ time. This applies as much to music (rhythm, scales and chords) as to all the visual arts, which are addressed in this book. The visual arts are also related – more and more closely – to other sciences (material, life and cultural). However, in order to get to the very roots of the connections between art and science, we felt it appropriate to choose “the queen of sciences”.
Within the mathematical sciences themselves, geometry, born from the vision of space (geometry: “measuring the Earth”), is, in this respect, the first. In the words of Max Bill: “The primary element of any plastic work is geometry, in terms of relationships between positions in the plane or the space”1. Confronted with the forms they saw in nature, the early geometrists tried to understand them by drawing them in an idealized way, that is, by modeling them. In the artists’ hands, these basic forms became the means of expression with universal scope.
Before characterizing this unquestionable presence of mathematics in the works of art in more detail, we should first note that mathematics, by its very nature, has a tendency towards plastic representations: mathematical objects, created for the purpose of translating scientific abstractions into visual terms.
Visual artists of modernity have often taken their inspiration from mathematical models, as if to delegate to them the task of speaking the unspeakable of art. Think of M.C. Escher, who exploited the riches of tiles from the hyperbolic plane, or Salvador Dali, who represented the crucified Jesus on a hypercube2, or the constructivist sculptors Henry Moore, Naum Gabo and Barbara Hepworth.
A certain parallelism between mathematical and artistic approaches has often been argued – and equally often rebutted. Let us therefore say at the outset what, in our view, should be excluded, and that is the quest for beauty for its own sake. If mathematics happens to be “beautiful”, this is actually a consequence of its elegance, in other words, its simplicity. As for art, it renounced beauty as a determining criterion long ago.
What seems of greater interest in this respect is the search for truth. This is, without question, the ambition of mathematics, which is wholly intellectual in nature and based on axioms that are posited as true or on accepted assumptions. This ambition is more intuitive in art: in a picture, truth is not expressed in a “thinking way”; it can be simultaneously striking and inaccessible.
The best established point of convergence between the artistic and mathematical approaches (as with other sciences) is that they turn the subject, whatever it may be, into a heuristic form; that is, they make it thoughtprovoking. Moving away from a materialistic concept of painting, can mathematics help us to discover the “spiritual software” of a work of art?
Let us turn to the contemporary aspects of the “marriage” between mathematics and the visual arts.
Since the emergence of non-Euclidean geometries and new branches of physics (quantum and relativistic) that point to the importance of chance, or even uncertainty, in the material world, we have seen a gradual erasure of the boundaries between the logical understanding of phenomena and the intuitive approach. Max Bill’s Mathematical Art represents a culmination of this convergence.
In the wake of conceptual art, digital art has driven the dematerialization of artwork still further. Now that a painting is nothing but a signal, devoid of any meaning of its own, the work’s significance has shifted upstream, in other words, to its production processes, the algorithms or the thought processes that generated it.
But there is more: having gradually freed itself from the material (in favor of light, or other forms of energy or information and communication), the work of art tends nowadays to emancipate itself from its creator, with their assent, and win its autonomy. Randomness thus plays a role, not only in the decision-making processes of
