a claim by the Contractor to any additional payment from the Employer and/or to an extension of time.9 9 See Section 15.2.5.
10 10 See Section 15.2.13.
11 11 See Section 16.2.
12 12 See Sections 15.2.10 and 16.2.1.
13 13 Although no time within which he should do so is indicated, clause 1.3 in the 2017 editions provides that all notices and other types of communication (referred to in the clause) are not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed.
14 14 See Section 15.2.9.
15 15 It might be possible to challenge the determination itself on the basis, for example, that the process was flawed in that the Engineer, in the Red and Yellow Books, was not acting neutrally, and then argue that this vitiated the determination so that the failure to give a NOD in time was not fatal to the claim since only a valid determination could be the subject of a NOD. An argument of that kind might succeed in some jurisdictions but there is no procedural mechanism under the contracts for disturbing a determination if no NOD is given in time.
16 16 See Section 16.2.6.
Конец ознакомительного фрагмента.
Текст предоставлен ООО «ЛитРес».
Прочитайте эту книгу целиком, купив полную легальную версию на ЛитРес.
Безопасно оплатить книгу можно банковской картой Visa, MasterCard, Maestro, со счета мобильного телефона, с платежного терминала, в салоне МТС или Связной, через PayPal, WebMoney, Яндекс.Деньги, QIWI Кошелек, бонусными картами или другим удобным Вам способом.
