.

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу - страница 22

Автор:
Жанр:
Серия:
Издательство:
 -

Скачать книгу

potentially pathogenic due to their diversion of host nutrients, many of the characteristic symptoms of disease cannot be explained on the basis of nutritional stress alone. The growth and development of a pathogen in its host, along with the response of the host to the presence of an alien organism, involve other interactions which have little to do with nutrition. Many of the more injurious effects of pathogens may be traced to toxic chemicals whose production may be incidental to their parasitic way of life (see Chapter 8). Looked at in this way, the statement “a good parasite is a poor pathogen” may appear to be justified. Any organism which is dependent upon another organism for its supply of nutrients might be expected to restrict its pathogenic effects to a minimum.

Diagram displaying a bar at the top labeled Symbiosis with arrows connecting to 2 boxes to the bottom labeled Antagonistic and Parasitism + - and Mutualistic and Mutualism + +.

      Biotrophs and Necrotrophs

      Although there is an enormous variety of pathogens, an important distinction can be made between those which rapidly kill all or part of their host and others which co‐exist with host tissues for an extended period without inflicting severe damage. The former category, referred to as necrotrophs, are often opportunist pathogens which invade wounds and juvenile or debilitated plant tissues. They grow intercellularly, producing cytolytic factors and then utilize the dead host tissues as a resource. The ability to attack a living host distinguishes these organisms from the saprotrophs which subsist exclusively on organic debris. In contrast, biotrophs do not kill their host immediately. They are, in fact, dependent upon viable host tissue to complete their development. Extreme biotrophy resembles mutualism in that it is difficult to discern any marked pathogenic effects.

Necrotrophs Biotrophs
Morphological and biochemical features
Host penetration via wounds or natural openings Host penetration direct or via natural openings
Few special parasitic structures formed Special parasitic structures, e.g., haustoria, typically formed
Host cells rapidly killed Living host–pathogen interface
Toxins and cytolytic enzymes produced Few or no toxins or cytolytic enzymes produced
Nutrients obtained from breakdown of host substrates Nutrients diverted from host cells
Destruction of host resistance Suppression or evasion of host resistance
Ecological features
Wide host range Narrow host range
Able to grow saprophytically away from host Unable to grow away from host
Attack juvenile, debilitated or senescing tissues Attack healthy hosts at all stages of development

      An alternative view of these different lifestyles is that necrotrophs may have evolved from biotrophs through an increasing ability to produce enzymes capable of degrading complex substrates. This theory proposes that the first fungi were dependent on living plants, but gradually evolved independence by developing enzyme systems able to deal with polymeric carbon sources in plant litter. Such schemes can therefore be extended to include free‐living saprotrophs but in the absence of any adequate fossil record, both versions are speculative. The advent of techniques for analyzing genome structure and molecular phylogeny may, however, provide fresh evidence to support or refute such evolutionary models.

      A human analogy for these contrasting types of parasite has been proposed, as follows: necrotrophs are “thugs” while biotrophs are “con artists,” reflecting their more devious way of obtaining resources from the host plant. However, the original idea that necrotrophs are unsophisticated pathogens is now being revised as we learn more about their strategies for invading plants and overcoming host defense. It turns out that some have the capacity to hijack host pathways, leading to programmed cell death, thereby releasing nutrients for their own use.

Скачать книгу