developed for gastrointestinal stapling by lot of different companies. The author is mostly familiar with the stapling from Medtronics therefore will refer to their product for the remaining of the chapter.
Surgical staplers are classified as “skin” staplers, linear staplers, and circular or end‐to‐end staplers. Skin staplers have been successfully used in single‐layer, noncrushing appositional small intestinal anastomosis, enterotomy closure, and gastropexy techniques (Coolman et al. 2000). For intestinal use, regular‐size disposable skin staplers using stainless steel staples (4.7 mm H × 3.5 mm W) (Autosuture Premium 35, Medtronics, Minneapolis, MN) (Figure 2.2) have been reported. For gastropexy, a wide skin stapler has been recommended (Royal 12 W 6.5 mm × 4.1 H) (Coolman et al. 1999).
Linear stapling devices come in a variety of lengths and staple rows. Most linear staplers for veterinary medicine have staple height that is predetermined based on cartridge selection. Some are disposable while others come with reloadable handles with disposable cartridges. In veterinary medicine linear staplers are used most frequently for liver lobectomy, gastrotomy, gastrectomy, and bowel closure. Thoraco‐abdominal staplers (TA stapler, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) are common linear staplers supplied with double or triple staple rows (Figure 2.3). Non‐cutting linear staplers are used for partial hilar lobectomy and pancreatectomy, for gastrotomies, or to staple off intestinal ends during functional end‐to‐end stapled intestinal anastomoses. TA stapler 30 V3 fires three rows of fine staples (2.5 mm open to 1 mm closed) for secure hemostatic vascular closures at the hilus of organs (lobectomies). The double‐row TA 55 and 90 mm long (3.5 mm open to 1.5 mm closed) cartridge linear staplers are most used for intestinal surgery and partial liver or partial lung lobectomy. Double‐row TA 55 or 90 (4.8 mm open to 2.0 mm closed) staplers are used nearly exclusively for partial gastrectomies or Billroth 1 procedures. Newer DST TA linear staplers use reloadable linear cartridges with directional staple technology titanium staples. This technology uses a cross‐sectional rectangular staple wire that bends more reliably into a fully formed “B”‐shaped secure staple (http://www.medtronic.com/covidien/en‐us/products/surgical‐stapling/open‐staplers.html).
Cutting linear staplers have a cutting blade that divides the tissue after two rows of staggered staples are fired on either side of line. The gastrointestinal staplers (GIA, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) are commonly used in veterinary surgery and they are 60, 80, or 100 mm long (Figure 2.4).
Linear cutting and stapling devices are often used for pulmonary, cardiac, gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary, or reproductive applications. The staplers allow occlusion and division of tissue in a single surgical maneuver. GIA 4.8 mm staplers (4.8 mm open to 2.0 mm closed) are often used for partial gastrectomy during GDV surgery, and GIA 3.8 mm staplers (3.8 mm open to 1.5 mm closed) are used for intestinal anastomosis. Gastrointestinal staplers (Endo GIA, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) are used during endoscopic procedures. These cutting linear staplers have staples that continue past the cutting blade limit to ensure that incomplete incisions into vessels or hollow organs do not leak.
Circular stapling devices are used to perform end‐to‐end, end‐to‐side, or side‐to‐side anastomoses in the gastrointestinal tract. It fires a circular staggered double‐row staple line, and an inner circular cutting device creates a stoma within the circular staple line (Figure 2.5). Circular staplers create an inverted anastomosis. Circular staplers need to be sized correctly according to the diameter of the organ, and should not be used when the combined tissue thickness is less than 1 mm or more than 2.5 mm. In small animal surgery, the 21 and 25 mm EEA devices with 3.5 or 4.8 mm staples are used most often in gastrointestinal surgeries. The device diameter must fit inside the lumen of the organ to be stapled without tension. Patient size is a limiting factor for circular staplers in small animal surgery. Generally EEAs can be used in large bowel of most small animals and only medium‐ to large‐breed dogs for the small bowel. A Furniss device is used to place a purse‐string of monofilament sutures on either side of the tubular organ ends to be anastomosed. A detachable anvil is secured with one purse‐string suture. The other end is secured in a similar fashion to the stapler head. The anvil is connected to the head and the ends are firmly brought together. After the stapler is fired a circular cutting blade cuts a donut of tissue within the circular staple line (Figure 2.6). Always inspect the donut to be sure all layers of the bowel have been cut and there is a patent lumen.
References
1 Arbaugh, M. et al. (2013). Biomechanical comparison of glycomer 631 and glycomer 631 knotless for use in canine incisional gastropexy. Vet. Surg. 42 (2): 205–209.
2 Booth, H.W. (2003). Suture materials, tissue adhesives, staplers, and ligating clips. In: Textbook of Small Animal Surgery, 3e (ed. D. Slatter), 234–244. Philadelphia: Saunders.
3 Capperauld, I. (1989). Suture materials: a review. Clin. Mater. 4 (1): 3–12.
4 Chih‐Chang, C. and Williams, D.F. (1984). Effects of physical configuration and chemical structure of suture materials on bacterial adhesion: A possible link to wound infection. Am. J. Surg. 147 (2): 147–204.
5 Chu, C.C., Von Franhofer, J.A., Greisler, H.P. et al. (eds.) (1997). Wound Closure Biomaterials and Devices. New York: CRC Press.
6 Chu, C.C. and Williams, D.F. (1984). Effects of physical configuration and chemical structure of suture materials on bacterial adhesion. A possible link to wound infection. Am. J. Surg. 147 (2): 197–204.
7 Coolman, B.R. et al. (1999). Evaluation of a skin stapler for belt‐loop gastropexy in dogs. J. Am Anim. Hosp. Assoc. 35 (5): 440–444.
8 Coolman, B.R. et al. (2000). Comparison of skin staples with sutures for anastomosis of the small intestine in dogs. Vet. Surg. 29 (4): 293–302.
9 Corman, M.L. et al. (1989). Comparison of the valtrac biofragmentable anastomosis ring with
