and social work.
An Overview of the Theory Chapters
The Early Pioneers
The first modern psychologist to adopt a systemic orientation and actually conduct family therapy sessions was Alfred Adler. The American pioneers included Murray Bowen; Virginia Satir; Carl Whitaker; Salvador Minuchin; and the strategic therapists, especially Jay Haley. Later, David and Jill Scharff would apply object relations to couples and family work. Each of these models adopted a modernist perspective in which there was a search for the essence of what made up a functional family. Some found that essence in communication, some found it in structure and hierarchy, and some focused on the development of the person within the system. Each of these founding models is unique in its perspectives and interventions, but all of them are systemic in nature.
Object Relations Family Counseling
Key figures: David and Jill Scharff, Nathan Ackerman, Ivan Boszormenyi-Nagy, Mary-Joan Gerson, Peggy Papp, Samuel SlippThe theory chapters start with the systemic approach of object relations therapists. Beginning with Sigmund Freud’s original drive/structure psychology, multiple scientist-practitioners began in the late 1920s and 1930s to investigate actual children and the nature of their relationships with significant caregivers. Many of these investigations were initiated in England, and the theorists came to be known as object relations practitioners. David and Jill Scharff developed object relations family therapy more fully using emotional tracking and an analysis of transference and countertransference to uncover unconscious processes within the family.
Adlerian Family Counseling
Key figures: Alfred Adler, Rudolf Dreikurs, Oscar Christensen, Len Sperry, Jon Carlson, Paul Peluso, Bill Nicoll, Jim BitterAdler was the first practitioner-theorist to speak of social embeddedness, family atmosphere, family interactions, the family constellation, and birth order, and he was the first psychologist to engage in family practice and interventions. His initial work with families and communities was systematized and expanded by Rudolf Dreikurs, who was, during his lifetime, the most prominent of Adlerian practitioners in the United States. Adler’s focus represented a huge paradigm shift in the development of psychodynamic theories, just as the general field of family counseling and practice would be another paradigm shift away from a focus on private, individual work.
Bowen and Multigenerational Family Counseling
Key figures: Murray Bowen, Betty Carter, Thomas Fogarty, Phillip Guerin, Michael Kerr, Monica McGoldrickSixty years ago, the models that would become the foundation for the field of marriage and family therapy began to emerge. These models included the multigenerational approach taken by Murray Bowen with his emphasis on differentiation of self, the problems of triangulation, and the passing of problems from one generation to the next. Murray Bowen also emphasized that the personal development and the professional development of the therapist were linked and were essential to the practice of family therapy.
Satir and the Human Validation Process Model
Key figures: Virginia Satir, John Banmen, Jean McLendon, Maria Gomori, Jane Gerber, Sharon LoeschenPerhaps no family practitioner emphasized the use of self in therapy more than Virginia Satir. A pioneer in the field of family therapy, Satir brought her background as a clinical social worker to her understanding of family process. She emphasized self-esteem and communication as avenues for understanding and intervening in family dynamics, and she provided us with a process for change that included human contact, touch, caring, and nurturance.
Whitaker and Symbolic-Experiential Family Counseling
Key figures: Carl Whitaker, David Keith, Thomas Malone, Gus NapierAlthough Satir was highly experiential in her approach, it was really Carl Whitaker who introduced the symbolic (with all of its existential meaning) to experiential counseling with families. Whitaker gave a whole new meaning to the process of coaching in family counseling. He stretched the boundaries of creativity and innovation when he danced with families. Whitaker often provoked anxiety in an effort to promote change. He also demonstrated the value of working with cotherapists in family sessions. A chapter on this method is available at www.jamesrobertbitter.com.
Minuchin and Structural Family Counseling
Key figures: Salvador Minuchin, Harry Aponte, Jorge Colapinto, Charles Fishman, Patricia MinuchinOne of the family practitioners who both influenced and was influenced by Carl Whitaker was the great master of structural family therapy Salvador Minuchin. Minuchin helped the field of family counseling understand the organization of families through the sequences of interactions and the boundaries (or lack of them) that existed between subsystems. Using joining, reframing, and enactment, Minuchin and his followers provided the early foundation for systemic work with families, especially poor families.
Strategic Family Counseling
Key figures: Jay Haley, Cloe Madanes, Mara Selvini Palazzoli, Paul Watzlawick, John WeaklandBy the 1980s, Minuchin’s work was often integrated with the problem-solution focus of the strategic therapists. Strategic therapists focused on the possibilities for change in systems that they understood to be hierarchies of power and function. Many of these practitioners were influenced by the theories and systemic thinking of Gregory Bateson as well as the indirect messages and trance work of Milton H. Erickson. This was especially true of Jay Haley and the practitioners at the Mental Research Institute in Palo Alto, California, where a focus on brief family therapy was first introduced. In turn, strategic therapists in the United States would also influence the strategic model in Milan, Italy, where Mara Selvini Palazzoli and her associates would focus on paradox, counterparadox, and circular (or relational) questioning.
The Postmodern Transition
By the 1990s, the field of family counseling itself had begun to experience a paradigm shift. Most of the approaches mentioned earlier fell into what we would now call a modernist perspective, in that they all searched for the essence of what makes up family process and sought to change the family in more functional and useful ways. The postmodern perspective challenged the idea of essences and a true knowing of the family system, suggesting that knowing a family depends as much on the perspective of the knower as the family. Thus, if we were to replace any family practitioner with any other family practitioner, a whole new understanding of the family would emerge. If there are multiple therapists working with a family, there are multiple perspectives on both understanding and helping the family. In this sense, most postmodern practitioners adopt a collaborative, social constructionist approach to family counseling. They believe that families are literally coconstructed in the language, stories, and processes that make up their lives and even in the process of counseling itself. Today the heart of social constructionist approaches to family counseling comes in the form of challenging dominant cultural and social positions and taking a stand against the ways in which such dominance constricts and restricts individuals, couples, and families.
