spectrum."/>
Figure 1.1 The electromagnetic spectrum.
Figure 1.2 Relationship between rays and wavefronts.
At any point in space in an optical field, a ray may be defined as the unit vector perpendicular to the surface of constant phase at that point with its sense lying in the same direction as that of the energy propagation.
1.2 Fermat's Principle and the Eikonal Equation
Intuition tells us that light ‘travels in straight lines’. That is to say, light propagates between two points in such a way as to minimise the distance travelled. More generally, in fact, all geometric optics is governed by a very simple principle along similar lines. Light always propagates between two points in space in such a way as to minimise the time taken. If we consider two points, A and B, and a ray propagating between them within a medium whose refractive index is some arbitrary function, n(r), of position then the time taken is given by:
(1.3)
c is the speed of light in vacuo and ds is an element of path between A and B
This is illustrated in Figure 1.3.
Figure 1.3 Arbitrary ray path between two points.
Fermat's principle may then be stated as follows:
Light will travel between two points A and B such that the path taken represents a local minimum in the total optical path between these points.
Fermat's principle underlies all ray optics. All laws governing refraction and reflection of rays may be derived from Fermat's principle. Most importantly, to demonstrate the theoretical foundation of ray optics and its connection with physical or wave optics, Fermat's principle may be directly derived from the wave equation. This proof demonstrates that the path taken represents, in fact, a stationary solution with respect to other possible paths. That is to say, technically, the optical path taken could represent a local maximum or inflexion point rather than a minimum. However, for most practical purposes it is correct to say that the path taken represents the minimum possible optical path.
Fermat's principle is more formally set out in the Eikonal equation. Referring to Figure 1.2, if instead of describing the light in terms of rays it is described by the wavefront surfaces themselves. The function S(r) describes the phase of the wave at any point and the Eikonal equation, which is derived from the wave equation, is set out thus:
(1.4)
The important point about the Eikonal equation is not the equation itself, but the assumptions underlying it. Derivation of the Eikonal equation assumes that the rate of change in phase is small compared to the wavelength of light. That is to say, the radius of curvature of the wavefronts should be significantly larger than the wavelength of light. Outside this regime the assumptions underlying ray optics are not justified. This is where the effects of the wave nature of light (i.e. diffraction) must be considered and we enter the realm of physical optics. But for the time being, in the succeeding chapters we may consider that all optical systems are adequately described by geometrical optics.
So, for the purposes of this discussion, it is one simple principle, Fermat's principle, that provides the foundation for all ray optics. For the time being, we will leave behind specific consideration of the detailed behaviour of individual optical surfaces. In the meantime, we will develop a very generalised description of an idealised optical system that does not attribute specific behaviours to individual components. Later on, this ‘black box model’ will be used, in conjunction with Gaussian optics to provide a complete first order description of complex optical systems.
1.3 Sequential Geometrical Optics – A Generalised Description
In applying geometrical optics to a real system, we are attempting to determine the path of a ray(s) through the system. There are a few underlying characteristics that underpin most optical systems and help to simplify analysis. First, most optical systems are sequential. An optical system might comprise a number of different elements or surfaces, e.g. lenses, mirrors, or prisms. In a sequential optical system, the order in which light propagates through these components is unique and pre-determined. Second, in most practical systems, light is constrained with respect to a mechanical or optical axis of symmetry, the optical axis, as illustrated in Figure 1.4. In real optical systems, light is constrained by the use of physical apertures or ‘stops’; this will be discussed in more detail later.
Of course, in practice, the optical axis need not be a continuous, straight line through an optical system. It may be bent, or folded by mirrors or prisms. Nevertheless, there exists an axis throughout the system with respect to which the rays are constrained.
Figure 1.4 Constraint of rays with respect to optical axis.
Figure 1.5 Generalised optical system and conjugate points.
1.3.1 Conjugate Points and Perfect Image Formation
We consider an ideal optical system which consists of a point source of light, the object, and an optical system that collects the light and re-directs all rays emanating from this point source or object, such that the rays converge onto a single point, the image point. At this stage, the interior workings of the optical system are undefined; the system behaves as a ‘black box’. The object is said to be located in object space and the image in image space and the pair of points are said to be conjugate points. This is illustrated in Figure 1.5.
In Figure 1.5, the two points P1 and P2 are conjugate. The optical system can be simple, for example a single lens, or it can be complex, containing many optical elements. The description above is entirely generalised. Where the object point lies on the optical axis, its image or conjugate point also lies on the optical axis. In
