Ecology. Michael Begon
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу Ecology - Michael Begon страница 42
Source: (a) After Marzusch (1952). (b, c) Data compiled from various sources by Clarke (2017).
effectively linear effects on rates of growth and development
For an ecologist, however, effects on individual chemical reactions are likely to be less important than effects on rates of growth (increases in mass), on rates of development (progression through lifecycle stages) and on final body size, since, as we shall discuss much more fully in Chapter 4, these tend to drive the core ecological activities of survival, reproduction and movement. And when rates of growth and development of whole organisms are plotted against temperature, there is quite commonly an extended range over which there are, at most, only slight deviations from linearity (Figure 2.9).
Figure 2.9 Effectively linear relationships between rates of growth and development and temperature. (a) Growth of the protist Strombidinopsis multiauris. (b) Egg development in the beetle Oulema duftschmidi. (c) Egg to adult development in the mite Amblyseius californicus. The vertical scales in (b) and (c) represent the proportion of total development achieved in one day at the temperature concerned.
Source: (a) After Montagnes et al. (2003). (b) After Severini et al. (2003). (c) After Hart et al. (2002).
day‐degree concept
When the relationship between growth or development is effectively linear, the temperatures experienced by an organism can be summarised in a single very useful value, the number of ‘day‐degrees’. For instance, Figure 2.9c shows that at 15°C (5.1°C above a development threshold of 9.9°C) the predatory mite, Amblyseius californicus, took 24.22 days to develop (i.e. the proportion of its total development achieved each day was 0.041 (= 1/24.22)), but it took only 8.18 days to develop at 25°C (15.1°C above the same threshold). At both temperatures, therefore, development required 123.5 day‐degrees (or, more properly, ‘day‐degrees above threshold’), i.e. 24.22 × 5.1 = 123.5, and 8.18 × 15.1 = 123.5. This is also the requirement for development in the mite at other temperatures within the non‐lethal range. Such organisms cannot be said to require a certain length of time for development. What they require is a combination of time and temperature, often referred to as ‘physiological time’.
temperature–size rule
Together, the rates of growth and development determine the final size of an organism. For instance, for a given rate of growth, a faster rate of development will lead to smaller final size. Hence, if the responses of growth and development to variations in temperature are not the same, temperature will also affect final size. In fact, development usually increases more rapidly with temperature than does growth, such that, for a very wide range of organisms, final size tends to decrease with increasing temperature: the ‘temperature–size rule’ (see Atkinson et al., 2003). An example for single‐celled protists (72 datasets from marine, brackish and freshwater habitats) is shown in Figure 2.10a: for each 1°C increase in temperature, final cell volume decreased by roughly 2.5%.
Figure 2.10 The temperature–size rule (final size decreases with increasing temperature). (a) Reduction in protist cell volume (65 datasets combined) with increasing rearing temperature. The vertical scale measures the proportional change from cell volume at 15°C. (b) Maximal size of 74 fish species generally declines across a steep temperature gradient in the Mediterranean Sea. The figure presents the best model based on the whole dataset, plotting percent of maximum size observed with an increase in maximum sea surface temperature (SST) of up to 5°C. The species vary in their activity levels: lighter shading corresponds to more active pelagic species and darker shading to more sedentary benthic species. The active species show a steeper decline in maximum size with increasing temperature.
Source: (a) After Atkinson et al. (2003). (b) After van Rijn et al. (2017).
These links can equally be seen from the viewpoint of how metabolism co‐varies with temperature and size. We pick this up again in Section 3.9 when we look at the so‐called metabolic theory of ecology.
APPLICATION 2.3 Getting predictions right in the face of climate change
The effects of temperature on growth, development and size may be of practical rather than simply scientific importance. Increasingly, ecologists are called upon to predict. We may wish to know what the consequences would be, say, of a 2°C rise in temperature resulting from global warming (Section 2.9.2), or to understand the role of temperature in seasonal, interannual and geographic variations in the productivity of, for example, marine ecosystems. We cannot afford to assume exponential relationships with temperature if they are really linear, nor to ignore the effects of changes in organism size on their role in ecological communities. Figure 2.10b shows for 74 fish species how maximum size varies across a steep sea surface temperature gradient in the Mediterranean Sea. If the reason for this pattern is the temperature–size rule (rather than genetic differences between locations) there could be important implications for fishery yields in a warmer climate. Van Rijn et al. (2017) suggest that the most pronounced size reductions will occur in large, active, non‐migratory species that are often the major source of economic revenue, while elevated temperatures may have smaller effects on benthic, less active, and often less valuable, species. To optimise their catch, fishers may have to adapt their fishing strategies.
2.3.3 Ectotherms and endotherms
Many organisms have a body temperature that differs little, if at all, from their environment. A parasitic