he was a figure of the city and the office, commemorated for work as Washington’s right hand and the behind-the-scenes orchestration of the Constitutional Convention. For Federalists, he was the very force of visionary energy itself, while for Republicans, he was the manipulative schemer. And we can see here how the Jefferson-Hamilton pair, generated from the reconfigured Washington-Franklin pair, fed back into the revision of the latter. From the Federalist perspective, Hamilton combined the intellect of Franklin with the achievements of Washington; from the Republican perspective, Jefferson combined the enlightened democratic commitments of Franklin with the careful restraint of Washington. And so too the reverse: for Federalists, Jefferson combined Washingtonian passivity and delay with Franklinian heterodoxy and immorality, while for Republicans, Hamilton pursued a conniving Franklinian system-building with a combination of Washington’s Anglophilia and militaristic aggression.
In the Revolutionary moment, the Washington-Franklin pair emerged from a royalist cultic system to address and explore the question of political resistance, the affective combinatorics of republicanism. In the 1790s situation, still defined by the sense of republican intellectual hegemony, the problem was governance, not the challenge to government, and the consequent parsing of the problem took different shape. Because this symbolic system was not first and foremost about political positions but about affective fantasy, it matured in ways that paralleled other imaginative media of the time. We might note that the constellation of the ’70s
had more in common with the characterological portraits of heroic historiography (from which it drew and which it fed), whereas the configuration of the ’90s inevitably drew more on the novel, in which women were often, if not always, central figures. Thus, the ’90s witnessed a dual gendering and sexualization of the Founders, already prefigured in Judith Sargent Murray’s portrait of the republican mother as commonwealth president—a female Washington. Again we may draw on our seemingly trivial and nonacademic knowledge of the Founders to sketch out their respective positions. Washington could emerge as the Father of the Nation not despite his apparent sterility and childlessness46 but precisely because of it, a position affirmed by the complementarily vague status of Martha Washington: cautious and reluctant action found its sexual manifestation in surrogate parenting. By contrast, the “knowing” Franklin emerged as a figure of sexual activity, with his wife receding into the shadows, obscured by the more prominent William, the bastard son who became the royalist governor as a marker of sexual excess. The Jefferson and Hamilton positions played out these masculine variants—the Jeffersonian scandals of the day stressed his widower status but also his illicit sexual relationships (first the assault on Elizabeth Walker, his neighbor’s wife; later the liaison with Sally Hemings). He was not quite masculine in a solid sense but still sexually active, and his nonpromotable heirs (slaves) signaled a variant of the childless Washington and Franklin’s bastard. Meanwhile, Hamilton was himself the bastard son, and his tremendous intellect could not prevent him from entanglement with Maria Reynolds and her husband. In each instance, the gendered and sexual characterization rounded out the political portrait: Washington’s restraint meant that his citizens (or, in some variants, his slaves) were his “children”; Franklin’s ideological tendencies became manifest in excessive sexuality; Jefferson’s focus on reflexive theorization meant that he produced not a solid republican family but property to be analytically assessed; and Hamilton’s focus on aggressive masculine enactment led to a spectacularly self-destructive affair.
Конец ознакомительного фрагмента.
Текст предоставлен ООО «ЛитРес».
Прочитайте эту книгу целиком, купив полную легальную версию на ЛитРес.
Безопасно оплатить книгу можно банковской картой Visa, MasterCard, Maestro, со счета мобильного телефона, с платежного терминала, в салоне МТС или Связной, через PayPal, WebMoney, Яндекс.Деньги, QIWI Кошелек, бонусными картами или другим удобным Вам способом.
