So Great a Salvation. Группа авторов
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу So Great a Salvation - Группа авторов страница 3
“Liberation” (eleutheria) is a cognate of “salvation.” Liberation from what is often the debate. Three New Testament verses seem to indicate liberation is on the personal, sociopolitical, and even cosmic levels: “If the Son has liberated you, you will be liberated indeed” (John 8:36); “the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has set you free from the law of sin and death” (Rom. 8:2); “creation itself will be liberated from the bondage of decay and will enter upon the glorious liberty of the children of God” (Rom. 8:21). Both Latin American scholars in this volume, Jules Martínez-Olivieri and Milton Acosta, as well as First Nations Canadian scholar Ray Aldred, work with this aspect of salvation in their chapters. But their perspectives on the “materiality of salvation” have particular nuances because their contexts are not the same.
A similar question could be asked about the next cognate, “redemption” (apolytrōsis; Rom. 3:24): redemption from what? Romans 3:24 is silent, but it does mention redemption as God’s gift. Other scriptural verses mention redemption from the wrath of God (Rom. 5:9); the power of sin (Eph. 1:7, 14; Romans 5) and the power of death (Rom. 6:23); the curse of the law (Gal. 3:13); and the devil (Heb. 2:14; 1 John 3:8). It is interesting that in the Old Testament God is called the gō’ēl (Redeemer; Ps. 19:14), but never in the New Testament is God or Jesus called Redeemer (lytrōtēs). The redemption metaphor comes from the context of the slave market (such as Exod. 21:8, Egyptian slavery; Isa. 51:11; 59:20, Babylonian captivity; Rom. 6:13–14, first-century Roman society). But the point is always about the new status of freedom. Thus the Bible speaks of the redeemed people as God’s own possession (Exod. 15:16; 1 Peter 2:9), ransomed with a price (Isa. 35:10; 51:11; 62:12; 1 Cor. 6:20; 7:23; 1 Tim. 2:6). Elaine Goh’s chapter seems to use this category well as she examines how Ecclesiastes can be used to speak to the redemption needed for Chinese who possess the mentality of fearing death, overconfidence, and workaholic tendencies.
Another favorite biblical word for salvation is “reconciliation” (katallagē; Rom. 5:10–11; 2 Cor. 5:18–20), translated by William Tyndale as “atonement” and thus focusing on overcoming the enmity between God and humanity (at-one-ment) rather than the broken relationships among people. Paul here is probably not using the Old Testament or Hebraic idea of atonement sacrifice (Leviticus 16), but the Greco-Roman background of transforming hostility into friendship or love. Such a relational and interpersonal connotation appeals to Majority World Christians, such as Sung Wook Chung, who examines the painful tension between North Korea and South Korea.
The last two terms are controversial, depending on the interpretive frame one uses to understand the concepts. “Being set right” (dikaioumenoi; Rom. 3:24) is often used to mean “vindicating” in the context of justice where God stands with the weak or the oppressed, thus justifying them (Ps. 82:1–3). But the second meaning is also used in the Bible: reversing the lowly from shame to honor (Ps. 31:1–2);[6] thus the shameful cross in the New Testament sets right the distorted value system of glory (aesthetic) and obscenity (shame). Unfortunately, the second meaning has often been ignored, especially in legal Western societies, and is picked up by Elaine Goh, Ray Aldred, and Emily Choge Kerama in the Asian, Native North American, and African chapters, respectively, in this volume.
The most controversial cognate word for salvation is hilastērion, translated as either “propitiation” or “expiation.” “Propitiation” refers to the salvific work of Christ in placating divine justice or appeasing the wrath of God (Rom. 3:25; Heb. 9:5; cf. hilasmos, 1 John 2:2; 4:10).[7] My preferred translation, “expiation,” traces its theological roots to the Hebrew word kappōret, that is, “mercy seat” on the ark of covenant in the Holy of Holies,[8] thus indicating that “God loved us and sent his Son to be the expiation [hilasmos] of our sins” (1 John 4:10). Jesus Christ is “the expiation [hilasmos] not only for our sins but also for the sins of the whole world” (1 John 2:2). Gerald O’Collins writes of hilastērion in this regard as “wiping away”:
The LXX never introduces this verb or related words (e.g. exilaskomai) to speak of sinners appeasing or rendering favorable an offended God [propitiation]. It is rather God who expiates, purifies, and deals with sin (e.g., Ezek. 16:13). Likewise in the NT it is God who is the agent or subject of expiator activity, lovingly providing the “hilastērion,” his only Son, who is the means and the place for wiping away the stain of sin.[9]
Soteriology is not simply about atoning sacrifice but also about offering love. Salvation is not simply “saved from,” but also “saved to”; not simply delivery from sin and death, but also restoration to fullness of life; not simply suffering servant but also reigning king; not simply death and crucifixion, but also resurrection and consummation; not simply forgiveness, but also regeneration; not simply wrong and sin overcome, but also love and life abundant.[10] In short, salvation in the biblical understanding means God’s creative deliverance of people in their situation of need from that which threatens wholeness of life, impedes the order of creation, and disrupts God’s redemption in the world.
God so loves the Majority World. God’s expansive love is expressed indigenously in global contexts through the back-roads and alleys of African villages, the new trails of Latin American valleys, and the highways of Asian cities. From the perspective of “saved from” to “saved to,” here the language of the contributors to this volume varies, reflecting the myriad soteriological expressions in the New Testament: from sin to God (Acts 3:19), from death to life (1 John 3:14), from bondage to freedom (Philemon), from brokenness to wholeness (2 Cor. 12:9), from enmity to reconciliation (Eph. 2:16), from evil to goodness (Rom. 12:21), from despair to hope (1 Thessalonians). Just as these metaphors are multiple throughout Scripture, then, so also are the interpretations of soteriology in church history and even today: from guilt to judicial justification (John Calvin), from chaos to order (Gregory of Nazianzus), and from obscenity to beauty (Hans Urs von Balthasar).
Sin and Salvation: Toward a Soteriology of Truth, Goodness, and Beauty
Soteriology presupposes hamartiology (the doctrine of sin), but “sin” (or the “power of sin”) is understood as all that impedes God’s creation of superabundant life.[11] Yet salvation is not simply sin being broken, evil overcome, wrong forgiven. Salvation is also the broken image of God restored, God’s presence and love and justice fully realized, and paradise regained—encompassing the past and present to the end of time (eschaton). The problems of humanity and the world we live in are real: the morbid