Our final chapter, Be Your Own Peer! Principles and Policies for the Commons situates the participatory and democratic qualities of peer production in the wider context of current political, health, and ecological crises, and outlines strategic principles and policy proposals aiming to increase sustainability and fairness.
Creating the first Handbook of Peer Production has been a privilege. We hope it is of use.
References
1 Aaltonen, A., & Lanzara, G. F. (2015). Building governance capability in online social production: Insights from Wikipedia. Organization Studies, 36(12), 1649–1673.
2 Alderman, J. (2001). Sonic boom: Napster, mp3, and the new pioneers of music. New York, NY: Basic Books.
3 Arazy, O., Lifshitz‐Assaf, H., & Balila, A. (2019). Neither a bazaar nor a cathedral: The interplay between structure and agency in Wikipedia’s role system. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(1), 3–15.
4 Auray, N. (2005). Le sens du juste dans un noyau d’experts: Debian et le puritanisme civique. In B. Conein, F. Massit‐Folléa, & S. Proulx (Eds), Internet, une utopie limitée: Nouvelles régulations, nouvelles solidarités (pp. 71–94). Laval, QC: Presses de l’Université Laval.
5 Baran, P. (1964). On distributed communication. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
6 Barbrook, R., & Cameron, A. (1996). The Californian ideology. Science as Culture, 6(1), 44–72.
7 Barron, A. (2013). Free software production as critical social practice. Economy and Society, 42(4), 597–625.
8 Bastani, A. (2018). Fully automated luxury communism: A manifesto. New York, NY: Verso.
9 Bauwens, M., Kostakis, V., & Pazaitis, A. (2019). Peer to peer: The commons manifesto. London: University of Westminster Press.
10 Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim Code. Cambridge: Polity.
11 Benkler, Y. (2002). Coase’s penguin, or, Linux and “The nature of the firm.” The Yale Law Journal, 112(3), 369–446.
12 Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13 Birkinbine, B. (2020). Incorporating the digital commons. Corporate involvement in free and open source software. London: University of Westminster Press.
14 Bollier, D., & Helfrich, S. (2019). Free, fair, and alive: The insurgent power of the commons. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society.
15 Boltanski, L., Chiapello, E., & Elliott, G. (trans.) (2005). The new spirit of capitalism. London: Verso.
16 Bonaccorsi, A., & Rossi, C. (2004). Altruistic individuals, selfish firms? The structure of motivation in open source software. First Monday 9 (1). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v9i1.1113
17 Bowker, G., Baker, K., Millerand, F., & Ribes, D. (2010). Toward information infrastructure studies: Ways of knowing in a networked environment. In J. Hunsinger et al. (Eds.), International handbook of internet research (pp. 97–117). Dordrecht: Springer.
18 Broca, S. (2013). Utopie du logiciel libre: du bricolage informatique à la réinvention sociale. Lyon: Le passager clandestin.
19 Burrell, J. (2012). Invisible users: Youth in the Internet cafés of urban Ghana (Acting with technology). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20 Bruns, A. (2008). Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and beyond: From production to produsage. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
21 Cohen, J. (2019). Between truth and power: The legal constructions of informational capitalism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
22 Coleman, E. (2012). Coding freedom: The ethics and aesthetics of hacking. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23 Coriat, B. (2011). From Natural‐Resource Commons to Knowledge Commons: Common Traits and Differences, LEM Papers Series 2011/16, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant’ Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
24 Dafermos, G. (2012). Authority in peer production: The emergence of governance in the FreeBSD project. Journal of Peer Production, 1, 1–22. Retrieved from http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue‐1/peer‐reviewed‐papers/
25 Dalla Costa, M., & James, S. (1972). The power of women and the subversion of the community. Bristol: Falling Wall Press.
26 De Angelis, M., & Harvie, D. (2014). The commons. In M. Parker, G. Cheney, V. Fournier, & C. Land (Eds.), The Routledge companion to alternative organizations (pp. 280–294). Abingdon: Routledge.
27 Delfanti, A., & Söderberg, J. (2018). Repurposing the hacker: Three cycles of recuperation in the evolution of hacking and capitalism. Ephemera, 18(3), 457–476.
28 Descy, D. (2006). The wiki: True web democracy, TechTrends, 50(1), 4–5.
29 Eghbal, N. (2016). Roads and bridges: The unseen labor behind our digital infrastructure. New York, NY: Ford Foundation.
30 Euler, J. (2016). Commons‐creating society: On the radical German commons discourse. Review of Radical Political Economics, 48(1), 93–110.
31 Fisher, E. (2010). Contemporary technology discourse and the legitimation of capitalism. European Journal of Social Theory, 13, 229–252.
32 Frayssé, O., & O’Neil, M. (2015). Hacked in the USA: Prosumption in the digital age. In M. Frayssé & M. O’Neil (Eds.), Digital labour and prosumer capitalism (pp. 1–20). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
33 Freeman, J. (1972). The tyranny of structurelessness. The Second Wave. Retrieved from http://struggle.ws/hist_texts/structurelessness.html
34 González‐Barahona, J. M., & Robles, G. (2013). Trends in free, libre, open source software communities: From volunteers to companies. Information Technology, 55(5), 179–180.
35 Haruvy, E., Prasad, A., & Sethi, S. P. (2003). Harvesting altruism in open‐source software development. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 118, 381–416.
36 Hoffman, P., & S. Harris. (2009). The Tao of the IETF: a novice’s guide to the Internet Engineering Task Force, RFC 4677, 30 November 2009. Retrieved from www.ietf.org/tao.html
37 Holloway, T., Bozicevic, M., & Börner, K. (2007). Analyzing and visualizing the semantic coverage of Wikipedia and its authors. Complexity, 12(3), 30–40.
38 James, C. L. R. ([1938]1989). The Black Jacobins: Toussaint l’Ouverture and the San Domingo revolution. New York: Vintage.
39 Jarrett, K. (2016). Feminism, labour and digital media: The digital housewife. New York: Routledge.
40 Jarrett, K. (2019). Through the reproductive lens: Labour and struggle at the intersection of culture and economy.
