accumulation schemes – certainly as it pertains to rapid growth and the attraction of speculative financial capital, if not proven formulas for profitability. On the other hand, peer production enables the creation of digital commons that can be shared with an increasingly large online community. The production, maintenance, and reproduction of the commons over time also carries the possibility of ushering in an era where mutual aid, care, trust, conviviality, and the commonwealth are valued more than competition, exploitation, and the maximization of individual or corporate profit.
References
1 Abbate, J. (1999). Inventing the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2 Andrejevic, M. (2007). ISpy: Surveillance and power in the interactive era. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
3 Andrejevic, M. (2012). Exploitation in the data mine. In C. Fuchs, K. Boersma, A. Albrechtslund, & M. Sandoval (Eds.), Internet and surveillance: The challenges of web 2.0 and social media (pp. 71–88). New York, NY: Routledge.
4 Bauwens, M., & Niaros, V. (2017). Value in the commons economy: Developments in open and contributory value accounting [PDF file]. Retrieved from www.boell.de/sites/default/files/value_in_the_commons_economy.pdf
5 Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
6 Birkinbine, B. J. (2017). From the commons to capital: Red Hat, Inc. and the business of free software. Journal of Peer Production, 10. Retrieved from http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue‐10‐peer‐production‐and‐work/from‐the‐commons‐to‐capital/
7 Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2005). The new spirit of capitalism. London: Verso.
8 Brenner, R. (2006). The economics of global turbulence. London: Verso.
9 Cassidy, J. (2002). Dot.con: How America lost its mind and money in the Internet era. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
10 Cohen, N. (2016). Writer’s rights: Freelance journalism in a digital age. Montreal: McGill‐Queen’s University Press.
11 Coleman, E. G. (2013). Coding freedom: The ethics and aesthetics of hacking. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12 Colley, J. (2019, January 11). Why 2019 could be the year of another tech bubble crash. The Conversation. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/why‐2019‐could‐be‐the‐year‐of‐another‐tech‐bubble‐crash‐109468
13 Dalla Costa, M., & James, S. (1975). The power of women and the subversion of the community. Bristol: Falling Wall Press.
14 DeAngelis, M. (2017). Omnia sunt communia: On the commons and the transformation to post‐capitalism. London: Zed Books.
15 Deuze, M. (2007). Media work. Cambridge: Polity.
16 Drucker, P. F. (1994). Post‐capitalist society. New York, NY: HarperBusiness.
17 Dyer‐Witheford, N. (2006). The Circulation of the Common. Paper presented at Immaterial Labour, Multitudes and New Social Subjects: Class Composition in Cognitive Capitalism conference. University of Cambridge.
18 Federici, S. (2012). Revolution at point zero: Housework, reproduction, and feminist struggle. Oakland, CA: PM Press.
19 Fuchs, C. (2011, February 1). New media, web 2.0 and surveillance. Sociology Compass, 5(2), 134–147.
20 Fuchs, C. (2012). Critique of the political economy of web 2.0 surveillance. In C. Fuchs, K. Boersma, A. Albrechtslund, and M. Sandoval (Eds.), Internet and surveillance: The challenges of web 2.0 and social media (pp. 31–70). New York, NY: Routledge.
21 Gaither, C., & Chmielewski, D. C. (2006, July 16). Fears of dot‐com crash, version 2.0. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from http://articles.latimes.com/2006/jul/16/business/fi‐overheat16
22 Gutiérrez‐Aguilar, R. (2014). Beyond the “capacity to veto”: Reflections from Latin America on the production and reproduction of the common. South Atlantic Quarterly, 113(2), 259–270.
23 Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24 Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2004). Multitude: War and democracy in the age of empire. New York, NY: Penguin.
25 Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2009). Commonwealth. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
26 Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity: An enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Oxford: Blackwell.
27 Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28 Harvey, D. (2010). A companion to Marx’s capital. New York, NY: Verso.
29 Hitlin, P., & Rainie, L. (2019, January 16). Facebook algorithms and personal data. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from www.pewinternet.org/2019/01/16/facebook‐algorithms‐and‐personal‐data/
30 Huws, U. (2014). Labor in the global digital economy: The cyberteriat comes of age. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
31 Jarrett, K. (2016). Feminism, labour and digital media: The digital housewife. New York, NY: Routledge.
32 Lazzarato, M. (1996). Immaterial labor. In P. Virno and M. Hardt (Eds.), Radical thought in Italy: A Potential Politics (pp. 133–150). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
33 Levy, S. (2010). Hackers: Heroes of the computer revolution. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.
34 Linebaugh, P. (2008). The magna carta manifesto. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
35 Marx, K. (1906). Capital: A critique of political economy, Vol. 1. New York, NY: Modern Library.
36 Mason, P. (2015). Postcapitalism: A guide to our future. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
37 McGuigan, L., & Manzerolle, V. (Eds.) (2013). The audience commodity in the digital age: Revisiting a critical theory of commercial media. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
38 McRobbie, A. (2016). Be creative: Making a living in the new culture industries. Cambridge: Polity.
39 O’Mahony, S., & Bechky, B. A. (2008). Boundary organizations: Enabling collaboration among unexpected allies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(3), 422–459.
40 O’Reilly, T. (2005, September 30). What is web 2.0. O’Reilly.com. Retrieved from www.oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/archive/what‐is‐web‐20.html
41 Prashad, V. (2007). The darker nations: A people’s history of the third world. New
