ECLIPSE OF MAN
NEW ATLANTIS BOOKS
Adam Keiper, Series Editor
PREVIOUS VOLUMES:
Why Place Matters:
Geography, Identity, and Civic Life in Modern America
Edited by Wilfred M. McClay and Ted V. McAllister
Merchants of Despair:
Radical Environmentalists, Criminal Pseudo-Scientists, and the Fatal Cult of Antihumanism
Robert Zubrin
Neither Beast nor God:
The Dignity of the Human Person
Gilbert Meilaender
Imagining the Future:
Science and American Democracy
Yuval Levin
In the Shadow of Progress:
Being Human in the Age of Technology
Eric Cohen
www.newatlantisbooks.com
© 2014 by Charles T. Rubin
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of Encounter Books, 900 Broadway, Suite 601, New York, New York 10003.
First American edition published in 2014 by Encounter Books, an activity of Encounter for Culture and Education, Inc., a nonprofit, tax exempt corporation.
Encounter Books website address: www.encounterbooks.com
The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of ANSI / NISO Z39.48-1992 (R 1997) (Permanence of Paper).
FIRST AMERICAN EDITION
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGING-IN-PUBLICATION DATA
Rubin, Charles T.
Eclipse of man : human extinction and the meaning of progress / by Charles T. Rubin.
pages cm
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-1-59403-741-2 (ebook)
1. Philosophical anthropology. 2. Human beings—Forecasting. 3. Human evolution. 4. Human body—Technological innovations. 5. Cyborgs. 6. Biotechnology—Moral and ethical aspects. 7. Humanity. 8. Progress. I. Title.
BD450.R73 2014
128—dc23
2014022022
CONTENTS
CHAPTER ONE: The Future in the Past
CHAPTER TWO: Discovering Inhumanity
CHAPTER THREE: Enabling Inhumanity
CHAPTER FOUR: Perfecting Inhumanity
CHAPTER FIVE: The Real Meaning of Progress
Acknowledgments
Notes
Index
FOR MY PARENTS
I know that it is a hopeless undertaking to debate about fundamental value judgments. For instance, if someone approves, as a goal, the extirpation of the human race from the earth, one cannot refute such a viewpoint on rational grounds. But if there is agreement on certain goals and values, one can argue rationally about the means by which these objectives may be attained.
ALBERT EINSTEIN, 1940
“MANKIND WILL surely destroy itself.” Whether predicted in a thunderous denunciation of our flaws or with mild worldly regret, an apocalyptic future has become a cliché. Will it be global warming or global cooling? Nuclear winter or radiation poisoning? Famine due to overpopulation, or pollution-induced sterility? These are some of the possibilities I grew up with. But today, it is becoming increasingly common to hear of another route to the demise of humanity: we will improve ourselves, becoming something new and better, and in doing so we will destroy what we are now. We have this opportunity because science and technology are giving us the power to control human evolution, turning it from a natural process based on chance to one guided by our own intelligence and will.
This idea—that human progress points toward human extinction—is held by people who go by a variety of names: transhumanists, posthumanists, extropians, advocates of H+, or singularitarians. It can be difficult to keep these terms straight, as they each represent schools of thought whose agreements and disagreements can be complex and ingrown. For the purposes of this book, all these schools of thought will be given the generic label transhumanism.1 The essential insight that defines transhumanism is, to borrow a phrase, that “We are as gods and might as well get good at it.”2 Transhumanists argue not only that modern science and technology are giving human beings the power to take evolution into our own hands to improve the human species, and then to create some new species entirely, but also the ability to improve on all of nature. Much like the older apocalyptic visions, the transhumanists believe that mankind as we know it and nature as we know it are on their way out; but for most transhumanists, that is the deliberate goal sought, not a consequence of our hubris to be avoided. Indeed, the transhumanists believe that if we are to prevent some of the more common apocalyptic visions from becoming reality, we must redesign humanity so that our ruinous flaws can be eliminated. To avoid mere destruction, we must embrace creative destruction.3
Hence, the end of man can be the beginning of . . . who knows what, exactly? But, we are told, it will doubtless be some wondrous new home for intelligence,
