EIB Investment Report 2020/2021. Группа авторов

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу EIB Investment Report 2020/2021 - Группа авторов страница 20

EIB Investment Report 2020/2021 - Группа авторов

Скачать книгу

section draws conclusions about the implications for policy.

      Aggregate investment dynamics

      Investment growth continued until the end of 2019, but the pace slowed

      Aggregate investment rates continued to rise throughout 2019 in most EU members as investment growth outpaced growth in real gross domestic product (GDP) (Figure 1).[1, 2] The investment rate in the European Union rose above its long-term average at the end of 2019. This rise was also seen in Western and Northern Europe and in Central and Eastern Europe. The aggregate investment rate in Southern Europe, however, was 1.5 percentage points below the average of the past 25 years.

      In 2019, aggregate investment in the European Union grew about 3% relative to 2018. Half of this pace of growth resulted from higher investment in buildings and structures, including dwellings (Figure 2a). Investment in other buildings and structures, which includes infrastructure investment (discussed separately in this chapter), expanded at faster rates in Central and Eastern Europe. The investment in buildings and structures was supported by higher government capital expenditure and investment grants from the European Structural and Investment Funds (Figure 3c). Austria, France, Germany and Portugal also saw significant investment increases in buildings and structures.

      These positive developments notwithstanding, aggregate investment growth slowed down in the European Union in the second half of 2019 (Figure 2a). The slowdown was due to weakening international trade amid intensifying disputes between the United States and its main trading partners (EIB, 2019). In 2019 and early 2020, before the coronavirus pandemic drew all the attention of analysts and commentators, European economic discourse focused mostly on the weakening of the German economy as a result of falling exports.

       Figure 1

      Gross fixed capital formation (GFCF) in the European Union and the United States (% of real GDP)

image

      Source: Eurostat, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) national accounts and EIB staff calculations.

      Note: Real investment and GDP are in euro 2015 chain-linked volumes and US dollar 2014 chain-linked volumes for the European Union and the United States, respectively. The aggregate for Western and Northern Europe does not include Ireland, due to the high volatility of Irish data that obscures group-wide developments.

      Real GFCF and contribution by asset type (% change from a year earlier)

image

      Source: Eurostat and OECD national accounts; EIB staff calculations.

      Note: Panel a shows data for the European Union without Ireland, due to high volatility of Irish investment data that obscures EU-wide developments.

      Part of the slowdown came from investment in machinery and equipment and in buildings and structures, including dwellings. Investment ran out of steam first in Southern Europe in early 2019 (Figure 3b), mostly due to a pronounced slowdown in Italy. By the third quarter of 2019, the phenomenon had spread to Western and Northern Europe, as investment growth waned in Austria, the Nordic countries and Germany (Figure 3a).

      Unlike the European Union, investment in the United States was driven almost entirely by acquisitions of equipment and intellectual property and did not slow down in 2019 (Figure 2b). The United States has outperformed the European Union on investment in these two asset types throughout the past ten years, increasing the gap between the two economies. These types of investment are particularly important as they are likely to contribute to firm productivity and competitiveness and, as a consequence, aggregate economic productivity (EIB, 2018 and EIB, 2019).

      Real GFCF and contribution by asset type, European Union (% change from a year earlier)

image

      Source: Eurostat and EIB staff calculations.

      Investment in the European Union fell precipitously with the arrival of the global pandemic

      The large decline in investment in the first half of 2020 was commensurate with the contraction in GDP. Investment in the European Union dropped 19% relative to the second quarter of 2019, while GDP fell 14%.[3] This movement follows the usual business cycle pattern where investment declines more than overall GDP in recessions and bounces back more vigorously in expansions. By way of comparison, GDP in the first quarter of 2009 declined by 5.3% relative to the first quarter of 2008, whereas investment fell 11%. What was extraordinary about the decline in 2020 is that it all happened in just two quarters. This speed of events is a clear consequence of the government measures to tame the spread of the pandemic.

      Economic activity collapsed around mid-March, as most European governments began implementing drastic measures to curtail the pandemic. Investment might have already started to decline three weeks earlier, at the end of February when financial-market volatility jumped sharply in Europe. The decline in confidence indicators in February, reversing the gains of the previous three months, also supports this hypothesis. As a result, gross fixed capital formation (GFCF) in the European Union slid nearly 4% compared with the first quarter of 2019, with countries in Western and Northern Europe showing the same trend. As previously stated, the contraction was mostly due to falling investment in machinery and equipment (Figure 2a and Figure 3a). In Southern Europe, the downtrend in machinery and equipment investment was reinforced by a similar decline in investment in buildings and structures, including dwellings (Figure 3b). In Central and Eastern Europe, an increase in investment in other buildings and structures offset the decrease in equipment investment (Figure 3c).

      Investment declined far less in the United States than in the European Union. This was despite a much smaller difference in the decline in GDP between the two economies. The US deterioration was consistently much smaller across asset types, but followed a very similar pattern to Europe. On both sides of the Atlantic, investment in machinery and equipment declined the most, followed by investment in other buildings and structures and investment in dwellings. Investment in intellectual property increased in the United States in the second quarter of 2020 compared with the same period a year earlier, while in the European Union it declined and helped push down total investment by an additional 0.5 percentage points.

      Restrictions imposed across EU Member States acted as a major barrier to investment in the second quarter of 2020. A significant part of the precipitous decline is most likely due to these severe restrictions. The drop in investment in EU countries in the second quarter is clearly associated with the governmental or self-imposed curbs on movement

Скачать книгу