The Essential G. B. Shaw: Celebrated Plays, Novels, Personal Letters, Essays & Articles. GEORGE BERNARD SHAW
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу The Essential G. B. Shaw: Celebrated Plays, Novels, Personal Letters, Essays & Articles - GEORGE BERNARD SHAW страница 2
Skit For The Tiptaft Revue (1917)
Annajanska, The Bolshevik Empress (1917)
Back To Methuselah: A Metabiological Pentateuch (1921)
The Gospel of the Brothers Barnabas
Tragedy of an Elderly Gentleman
The War Indemnities (unfinished) (1921)
Miscellaneous Works of G. B. Shaw:
What do Men of Letters Say? - The New York Times Articles on War (1915)
"Common Sense About the War" by G. B. Shaw
"Shaw's Nonsense About Belgium" By Arnold Bennett
"Bennett States the German Case" by G. B. Shaw
Flaws in Shaw's Logic By Cunninghame Graham
Editorial Comment on Shaw By The New York World
Shaw Empty of Good Sense By Christabel Pankhurst
Comment by Readers of Shaw To the Editor of The New York Times
Open Letter to President Wilson by G. B. Shaw
A German Letter to G. Bernard Shaw By Herbert Eulenberg
Quintessence Of Ibsenism (1891)
The Impossibilities Of Anarchism (1895)
The Perfect Wagnerite, Commentary on the Niblung’s Ring (1898)
Letter to Beatrice Webb (1898)
The Revolutionist’s Handbook And Pocket Companion (1903)
Maxims For Revolutionists (1903)
How to Write A Popular Play: An Essay (1909)
Memories of Oscar Wilde (1916)
Essays on Bernard Shaw:
George Bernard Shaw by G. K. Chesterton
The Quintessence of Shaw by James Huneker
Old and New Masters: Bernard Shaw by Robert Lynd
George Bernard Shaw: A Poem by Oliver Herford
Introduction by G. K. Chesterton
In the glad old days, before the rise of modern morbidities, when genial old Ibsen filled the world with wholesome joy, and the kindly tales of the forgotten Emile Zola kept our firesides merry and pure, it used to be thought a disadvantage to be misunderstood. It may be doubted whether it is always or even generally a disadvantage. The man who is misunderstood has always this advantage over his enemies, that they do not know his weak point or his plan of campaign. They go out against a bird with nets and against a fish with arrows. There are several modern examples of this situation. Mr. Chamberlain, for instance, is a very good one. He constantly eludes or vanquishes his opponents because his real powers and deficiencies are quite different to those with which he is credited, both by friends and foes. His friends depict him as a strenuous man of action; his opponents depict him as a coarse man of business; when, as a fact, he is neither one nor the other, but an admirable romantic orator and romantic actor. He has one power which is the soul of melodrama—the power of pretending, even when backed by a huge majority, that he has his back to the wall. For all mobs are so far chivalrous that their heroes must make some show of misfortune—that sort of hypocrisy is the homage that strength pays to weakness. He talks foolishly and yet very finely about his own city that has never deserted him. He wears a flaming and fantastic flower, like a decadent minor poet. As for his bluffness and toughness and appeals to common sense, all that is, of course, simply the first trick of rhetoric. He fronts his audiences with the venerable affectation of Mark Antony—
"I am no orator, as Brutus is;
But as you know me all, a plain blunt man."
It is the whole difference between the aim of the orator and the aim of any other artist, such as the poet or the sculptor. The aim of the sculptor is to