potential for wisdom and virtue, ‘a great mind and great gentleness’, but that he already possesses these gifts. Moreover, Seneca's claim that not even ‘one single drop of blood’ had ever been spilled at Nero's behest, probably came across to some as a twisted joke. Yet it may be that, in private, Seneca was troubled by the death of Britannicus. After all, the brutal murder of children is a theme that recurs in his plays, most notably Thyestes.
SUPER-RICH SENECA
In 56 CE, shortly after these events, Seneca was appointed consul, the most senior political office in the Roman senate. Men who had attained consular rank were esteemed as nobles alongside the hereditary patrician class. Moreover, as soon as Britannicus had been killed off, Nero ‘loaded his best friends with gifts', according to Tacitus, presumably dividing up his dead brother's property among his closest advisors. This has been taken by some historians to explain, at least in part, how Seneca rose from moderately well-off provincial origins to become, under Nero, one of the richest men in the empire. Cassius Dio makes the extraordinary claim that Seneca was worth over 300 million sesterces, which would make him the Roman equivalent of a Warren Buffet or Jeff Bezos. Typically, only the Roman emperor himself or his closest associates might command such wealth. Hence another ancient source, the poet Martial, dubbed him ‘Super-rich Seneca’.
Unsurprisingly, Seneca also seems to have owned many properties and a great deal of land throughout Italy, and possibly also in Egypt. We don't know how many slaves he owned, but given his considerable wealth and property, at a rough estimate, they may have numbered over a thousand. As an example of his extravagance, we're told that Seneca owned 500 identical citrus-wood tables with legs of ivory, used for hosting massive banquets. That may sound implausible to modern readers, but it was not unusual for Rome's elite to pride themselves on holding vast banquets, akin to festivals, where hundreds of guests would be entertained. One such banquet, hosted by Lucius Verus, the brother of Marcus Aurelius, reputedly cost 6 million sesterces to put on. Expensive furniture and tableware were highly prized status symbols in elite Roman society.
In 58 CE, a Roman senator called Publius Suillius, who was indicted by Seneca and others for judicial corruption, brought the counter-charge of financial corruption against Seneca. He accused Seneca, perhaps owing to lingering resentment over his exile, of having a vendetta against anyone who had aligned themselves with the Emperor Claudius. However, he also accused Seneca of having enriched himself at the public expense in the short space of four years, i.e. since Nero became emperor. ‘In Rome, he spread his nets to catch the wills of childless men’, alleged Suillius, while ‘Italy and the provinces were sucked dry by his insatiable usury’.
This latter allegation is supported by Cassius Dio's claim that Seneca, wishing suddenly to call in a 40 million sesterce loan made to native Britons under Roman rule, ‘resorted to severe means’ in demanding repayment. Some historians believe this was one of several events that provoked the famous 61 CE uprising against Roman rule in Britain, led by Queen Boudica.
Suillius was found guilty of corruption and sent into exile, forfeiting half his estate. According to Tacitus, Seneca then attempted to go after the man's son in court as well, but ‘the emperor interposed his veto, on the ground that vengeance was satisfied’. In this instance, ironically, his wayward student Nero actually showed more clemency than Seneca. However, worryingly for Seneca, it demonstrated that Nero was now willing to publicly question the wisdom of his teacher's actions.
MURDER OF AGRIPPINA
By 59 CE, Seneca's influence over Nero was waning. The emperor sidelined his powerful mother and plotted to have her murdered. He employed the bizarrely elaborate method of having Agrippina set sail in a boat rigged to collapse, with the intention of crushing and/or drowning her. However, she narrowly escaped and swam back to shore. Seneca and Burrus may have known of this entire scheme. In any case, Nero was forced to seek their help when it failed. Tacitus reports that ‘Seneca took the initiative. He looked at Burrus and asked if the military should be ordered to carry out the killing’ (Annals, 14.7). Burrus agreed and sent a group of praetorians to clean up Nero's mess by completing the assassination.
Tacitus adds that when the soldiers cornered Agrippina, in her bedroom, she pointed at her womb and yelled ‘Strike here!’, knowing that they had been sent to kill her by her own child. Cassius Dio, on the other hand, claims that her last words were the power-crazed ‘Let him kill me, as long as he rules!’ Nero was now infamous as the murderer not only of his own brother, but also his mother – and Seneca and Burrus were both thoroughly entangled in his crimes. Nero's tyranny only grew worse from this point on.
Seneca composed a letter to be read before the senate, which claimed that Agrippina, having been discovered plotting against her son, had voluntarily taken her own life. Upon hearing it, Thrasea Pateus, the leader of a faction of scholars and senators referred to as the ‘Stoic Opposition’, stood up and silently walked out in protest, thereby risking his own life. Nero became increasingly suspicious that those Stoics who saw him as a tyrant were planning to overthrow him. The following year, Nero sent Rubellius Plautus, a relative of his and perceived as a rival to the throne, into exile. Plautus was accompanied by his mentor, the famous Stoic teacher, Musonius Rufus. However, Nero was still too afraid to lift a finger against Thrasea, his staunchest opponent in the senate.
Around this time, Nero instigated a festival called Juvenalia, or Games of Youth, in commemoration of the day he reached manhood and began shaving his beard. It was an enormous, grossly extravagant festival, sinister insofar as Nero used the opportunity to humiliate his political opponents by forcing them to engage in indecent performances on stage before huge audiences. ‘Now, more than ever’, says Tacitus, ‘not only these performers but the rest as well regarded the dead as fortunate.’ At the climax, we're told that Gallio, Seneca's elder brother, would introduce Nero himself, who craved celebrity, as the headline act. He would sing, accompanying himself on the lyre, although apparently his vocals weren't very good and he ‘moved his whole audience to laughter and tears at once’.
Nero created a special corps of 5000 soldiers, the size of an entire legion, called ‘Augustans’, who surrounded the crowd and led the cheering and applause, forcing compliance under threat of execution. Tacitus says that while Nero sang, Seneca and Burrus, the latter presumably in command of the guards, were on the stage beside him, continually prompting the audience to wave their arms and togas in appreciation of their emperor's performance. The crowd were forced to call out: ‘Glorious Caesar! Our Apollo, our Augustus, another Pythian! By thyself we swear, O Caesar, none surpasses thee.’ One man in the audience refused to participate, though – Thrasea Pateus, the leader of the Stoic Opposition.
LEAVING NERO
In 62 CE, Burrus, who had been a restraining influence on the emperor, died mysteriously. Suetonius mentions the rumour that Nero had him poisoned. Two new praetorian prefects were appointed, Faenius Rufus and Ofonius Tigellinus. Rufus did little to discourage Nero's excesses. Tigellinus actively encouraged them by, among other things, convincing Nero that his exiled relative Plautus and other Stoics were plotting a coup. Nero finally snapped and had Plautus assassinated.
Seneca, now in desperation, responded by trying to distance himself from his former student. He even asked to turn over his wealth to Nero so that he could retire in peace. Seneca was probably afraid that Nero might eventually have him killed in order to recover his wealth. This was a common threat hanging, like the Sword of Damocles, over the heads of conspicuously wealthy men in the ancient world.
In 64 CE, the Great Fire consumed much of Rome. Nero was suspected of starting it, or at least allowing it to burn unstopped, so that he might rebuild the city in accord with his own designs. The Christians were ultimately blamed for starting the fire and many were rounded up and executed, including St Paul.
Following the death of Burrus, Seneca
