and engineers of plants of the South, the Centre, the Urals were present at the Congress as guests and delegates. The decisions of the Congress had a huge impact on the development of steelmaking throughout the country. The resolution on the reporting report noted the need to develop the Urals industry in terms of quality – production of high quality products.
This dictated the development of smelting not only pure pig iron, but also highquality iron and steel. Therefore the nearest tasks of the Southern Urals were:
development of production of dynamical and transformer iron, installation of production of solid drawn pipes for responsible purpose, acceleration of organization of special steel production in Zlatoust, expansion of open-hearth production, organization of production of steel rolled wire. It was noted that the development of the production of quality products in the South Urals is a natural and correct way to revive the Urals metallurgy and guarantee its further development.
January 14, 1927 was issued a resolution of the SNK (Council of People’s Commissars) of the RSFSR on the report of the regional executive committee.
The resolution instructed the All-Union National Economy Council (SNK) – the State Planning Commission of the RSFSR – to pay special attention to the expansion of wood-coal fuel production and the development of high-quality metal products in the Urals, as well as the production of tool steel and highquality metal products.
The interests of the revival and growth of agriculture and the development of trade between town and village have led to the recovery of light industry in the South Urals earlier than heavy industry. The reconstruction of mines, factories, power plants and other enterprises was much harder.
The biggest investments were directed by the state to electrification – the energy base of the whole economy. During the recovery period, new enterprises were created only in the power industry and electrical industry.
In 1921 – 1926 the program-minimum of the GOELRO plan was fulfilled: restoration and unification by high-voltage lines, electric bushing-up of old power plants. The construction of new powerful district power plants in the South Urals was also launched.
In order to switch to self-accounting, three most important issues should have been resolved: the concentration of industrial production, changes in industrial management and in tariff policy.
The concentration of industry in the South Urals was carried out between 1921 and 1924. It was unusual, and meant not creating new powerful enterprises, but concentrating production on those factories and plants that were provided with raw material, material and financial resources. Only these enterprises were included in the state economic plan and fully or partially supplied by the state.
All other enterprises were either conserved, leased, conceded, or liquidated.
Such concentration made it possible to obtain surplus product from a certain part of industry.
The South Urals had great difficulties with food, there was a lack of industrial goods. Gradually, factories and factories were engaged in a persistent struggle to increase productivity, to save fuel, to use equipment better, and trade was developing. New economic policy has intensified the work of public and private enterprises, and industrial recovery has been rapid. A movement has begun at
enterprises for a voluntary increase in production rates. Workers made a commitment to work more, without additional pay. Strike brigades and groups of exemplary work were created, where high discipline and productivity were displayed.
Simultaneously with the quantitative growth of the working class, its activity and creative energy increased. By the end of the recovery period, labor productivity in the Orenburg Province reached 75% of the prewar level. On their own initiative, workers increased their production rates. In the railway workshops of E. S. Egorov, V. N. Kotov, F. I. Proshkin, I. E. Korzhemanov and others were performing a shift and a half or two standards. The ranks of inventors were growing. Railwayman FP Kazantsev invented a cast-iron body of air distributor to a new system of railway brakes.
New economis policy was aimed, first of all, at getting the region out of the deep social and economic crisis, restoring the economy and raising the national welfare. In order to achieve these goals during the new economic policy, the most important means were used, such as:
– to restore the equivalent exchange between town and village;
– introduction of commercial settlement in the sphere of industry and trade;
– creation of a hard currency and a developed credit and banking system;
– Wide use of various methods to stimulate workers and peasants.
More broadly, new economic policy was understood as the path to socialism through state capitalism while maintaining the firm and monopolistic political power of the Bolshevik Party. At the same time, the state apparatus was thought of as a tool to keep commodity-money relations within certain limits.
In 1926, 3.5 times more coal was extracted in the mines of the South Urals than in 1913. During the New economic policy period, a radical reform of industrial management was carried out. The scheme of management of the industry has acquired such kind: The Supreme Council of National Economy (VSNKh) – syndicate – trust.
Being relieved of the operational management of the enterprises, the All-Union Agricultural Exhibition began to develop only plans for the development of industry as a whole, to monitor their implementation, to conduct a single technical policy.
Syndicates (self-accounting trade unions of trusts created on shares) carried out functions of sales of production, by means of orders regulated work of trusts.
The main production unit of steel (until the end of 30-s) self-supporting associations – trusts. They were given the rights of planning, distribution of funds, personnel placement. The trusts were fully responsible for the break-even performance of their enterprises (the decree of April 10, 1923 established that the state treasury was not responsible for the debts of the trusts).
In the end it meant that from a passive object of management from above the state enterprise turned into an active subject of social and economic policy.
The logical consequence of the denaturalization of economic relations in the South Urals was the restoration of commodity and monetary and financial credit subsystems. As a result of the 1922—1924 monetary reform, the transition to hard currency was made. The work of banks was resumed. By placing production activities of the trusts under strict control, banks stimulated more efficient work.
Prombank introduced the procedure for granting long-term loans to trusts for new construction on a competitive basis.
The granting of significant economic independence to the trusts was organically connected, further, with the development of planned initiatives in the national economy. Thus, in 1921 the central planning body of the country (Gosplan) was created. In this case, the new economic policy did not change the single state economic plan and did not go out of its scope, and changed the approach to its implementation.
In other words, the problem of combining plan and commodity-money relations, plan and market, development of state, cooperative (industrial cooperation) and handicraft industry became important in the South Urals.
However, it should be stressed that the process described
