Pet-Specific Care for the Veterinary Team. Группа авторов

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Pet-Specific Care for the Veterinary Team - Группа авторов страница 126

Pet-Specific Care for the Veterinary Team - Группа авторов

Скачать книгу

Phosphatase Deficiency Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency Raine Syndrome Dental Hypomineralization Renal Cystadenocarcinoma and Nodular Dermatofibrosis Renal Dysplasia Retinal Degeneration Rickets Rod‐Cone Dysplasia 1, 1a, 3 Sanfilippo Syndrome Type A / Mucopolysaccharidosis IIIA (Dachshund Type) Scott Syndrome Sensory Ataxic Neuropathy Sensory Neuropathy Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (Autosomal) Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (X‐linked) Shaking Puppy Shar‐Pei Inflammatory Disease Short Tail (Brachyury) Skeletal Dysplasia Spinal Dysraphism Spinal Muscular Atrophy Spinocerebellar Ataxia Spondylocostal Dysostosis Spongiform Leukoencephalomyelopathy Spongy Degeneration with Cerebellar Ataxia (1 & 2) Stargardt Disease Startle Disease Subacute Necrotizing Encephalopathy Thrombopathia Trapped Neutrophil Syndrome van den Ende‐Gupta Syndrome von Willebrand Disease Types I, II, and III Xanthuria Type 1a, 2a, 2b X‐Linked Ectodermal Dysplasia X‐Linked Generalized Tremor Syndrome X‐Linked Hereditary Nephropathy X‐Linked Myotubular Myopathy

      Because the body has so many redundancies built into the system, it is also possible that an individual might have a genotypically determined risk but never develop phenotypic disease. It is also possible that a pet has a genotypically determined risk but the phenotypic presentation does not really compromise the animal's health. For example, a Labrador retriever might have a determined risk for exercise‐induced collapse (EIC) but in its typical environment and with its typical exercise regimen, it never becomes problematic.

      For some conditions, even though they may be predicted with a genotypic test, phenotypic tests are needed to determine when the condition becomes clinically relevant and treatment is needed, and then for monitoring. For example, the risk for some forms of glaucoma can be predicted based on genotypic testing, but it is still necessary to use intraocular pressure to diagnose clinical disease and as a way of monitoring treatment.

      The best use of genotypic tests is as a health screen rather than a disease screen. Pets are typically first examined around 8 weeks of age, and during this period the veterinary healthcare team will search for evident congenital issues, such as malocclusion, umbilical hernia, and luxating patellas. On the basis of this initial physical evaluation, vaccination and parasite control typically begin, and this is also the optimal time for starting pet health insurance, before anything gets identified that would be considered a preexisting condition (see 10.16 Pet Health Insurance).

      Phenotypic tests are more commonly done in practice, including blood tests, urinalysis, imaging, electrocardiography, etc. (Table 3.11.2). By 16 weeks of age, phenotypic testing regimens usually begin. This might involve early evaluation for hip dysplasia, urinalysis and tests looking for evidence of “stone” or “crystal formation” in the urine, or even following up on early suspicions of potential congenital heart disease. Further phenotypic testing will likely be predicated on the results of risk assessment (see 2.7 Risk Assessment), but might include definitive screening for hip dysplasia in the mature pet, glaucoma screening based on breed or genetic susceptibility, baseline evaluation of hemograms and biochemistries, and even specialist evaluation of breeding animals by ophthalmologists and/or cardiologists. All of this can be conducted seamlessly within a personalized care plan (see 1.3 Personalized Care Plans).

      Of course, phenotypic tests also have their limitations. In some cases, the disease process has to progress considerably before disease will be detected. For example, with diabetes mellitus, a diagnosis might not be confirmed until the patient is clinical and the blood glucose and urine glucose levels rise about a standard point. Prior to that, though, testing may indicate a trend toward that possible outcome. In other cases, such as with prepatent period, a pet may have a parasite, but it is not detectable until it reaches a life stage that is detectable on testing. In other situations, there may not be a single phenotypic test that can render a diagnostic result, so a panel of different tests might be needed to support a diagnosis.

      One other feature of some phenotypic tests is that a particular animal (or breed) may not reflect what is considered a “normal range” for the species. For example, there is a DNA test for congenital hypothyroidism with goiter in the toy fox terrier, but no such test for the adult‐onset hypothyroidism more commonly seen in practice. That requires testing with a panel of tests that might include free and total levels of thyroid hormones, thyroid‐stimulating hormone and even autoantibody levels to thyroid hormones. A diagnosis can sometimes still be elusive, especially in breeds that tend not to conform to the reference interval established by the testing laboratory (see 4.8 Pet‐Specific Relevance of Reference Intervals). In these cases, a better approach may be to establish a “normal range” for the individual, by assessing 3–5 tests of thyroid

Скачать книгу