181
187 182
188 183
189 184
190 185
191 186
192 187
193 188
194 189
195 190
196 191
197 192
198 193
199 194
200 195
Modern Finance, Management Innovation and Economic Growth Set
coordinated by
Faten Ben Bouheni
Volume 4
Performance of Valuation Methods in Financial Transactions
David Heller
First published 2021 in Great Britain and the United States by ISTE Ltd and John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, this publication may only be reproduced, stored or transmitted, in any form or by any means, with the prior permission in writing of the publishers, or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms and licenses issued by the CLA. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside these terms should be sent to the publishers at the undermentioned address:
ISTE Ltd
27-37 St George’s Road
London SW19 4EU
UK
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
111 River Street
Hoboken, NJ 07030
USA
© ISTE Ltd 2021
The rights of David Heller to be identified as the author of this work have been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
Library of Congress Control Number: 2020951018
British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data
A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library
ISBN 978-1-78630-636-4
Introduction
In France, public tender offers, public exchange offers and combined offers are all processes of acquisition. The governing regulations of the Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) guide how these public offers are carried out. Before they are launched, the initiator, with the help of their advisory bank, undertakes a process of analysis, with the main objective of determining the financial capacity of the business, in order to reach an offer price that will be proposed to the security holders of the company under evaluation. As underlined by Bellalah (1998), the shareholder will only divest their shares to the initiator of the offer if they consider the price proposed to be satisfactory. Therefore, the market capitalization of the target company is not enough to constitute the benchmark for the offer price; the evaluation must always follow an approach informed by multiple criteria.
The direct link between the profit reaped from a company’s investments and the profit demanded by the company’s investors will determine the quality of the investment policy pursued. By generating cash flows such that they maximize the amount of value created by the economic asset, a well-conducted investment policy will result in a higher return on investment than that demanded by investors. The economic value of shareholder equity will then increase. However, if the investment policy fails, the shareholder may sanction the company in question by selling its securities. They will then face financial difficulties, insofar as their economic assets have been devalued. And so, the shareholder has the power to grant funds to the company, and must, in this scenario, understand how to properly evaluate the company’s assets from an economic perspective, as well as their shareholder equity.
Beyond a sufficiently profitable investment policy, maximizing the value of economic assets comes from an optimal financial structure. Indeed, in order to determine the value of the economic asset, the cash flows that result from the investment policy are brought in line with the cost of capital. In this instance, it would be possible to have the ability to maximize this rate by using an appropriate financial policy. Evaluation regarding the structure of liabilities must include considerations that go well beyond the simple cost of different sources of financial gain. There are three major elements to take into account when looking to evaluate the feasibility of an optimal financial policy: these are taxation, both at the level of the company and of the individual, consideration of the costs of dysfunction and bankruptcy that an additional amount of debt would incur, and the behavioral phenomena in theories created by organizations. Indeed, beyond the framework of the theory of market equilibrium which considers the company to be a single player, conflicts between the various stakeholders, who do not always share the same interests nor make the same choices when it comes to the correct financial policy to be adopted, inevitably impact the nature and distribution of the funds that are granted to the company.
The traditional valuation of equity can be undertaken indirectly by first estimating the economic asset, and then subtracting the value of net debt after adjustment, or directly by adopting an average industry multiple. Within the acquisition market and in view of the sums involved, the valuation of the target company is essential to be able to come to a target buyback price for which a control premium is calculated, and before embarking on any negotiations with potential buyers. In short, valuation helps to make decisions about an opportunity for merger or partnership. More generally, this exercise is designed to help position the company within its particular market in terms of performance, as well as to improve the way it is managed and run, with a view to generate value by working on the areas that have been identified as weaknesses. In addition to this, valuation constitutes a tool that facilitates the development of a company that is seeking out opportunities for new financial support and entering new markets, for example. Finally, valuing the securities of the company allows us to comply with tax legislation and potentially reap the rewards that it offers.
The target price of a company can be fixed according to its assets, its competitors or even how it is predicted
