The Urban Planning Imagination. Nicholas A. Phelps

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу The Urban Planning Imagination - Nicholas A. Phelps страница 14

The Urban Planning Imagination - Nicholas A. Phelps

Скачать книгу

and politicians (Tarazona Vento, 2015). US architect-planners Andrés Duany and Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk have promulgated new urbanist formulations with the same sense of mission as Ebenezer Howard and Patrick Geddes. A global diaspora of expert consultants (Larner and Laurie, 2010; Prince, 2012) specializes in the substantive concerns discussed in the next chapter. These individuals operate within and draw sustenance from a now vast, globalized bureaucratic urban planning apparatus.

      Citizens emerge as powerful vectors of transformation in the urban planning imagination in the case of neighbourhoods subject to major immigration flows and resultant ethnic concentration or ‘superdiversity’. Here, planning impacts on the urban form can range from immediate needs for religious, ethnic or culturally specific facilities to the injection of broader, longer-term imaginations centred on place making and the remaking of nature (Gottlieb, 2007).

      Macro-, meso- and micro-level histories imply that multiple temporalities are present in the practice of urban planning. Indeed, it is this that demands the comparative look at urban planning: ‘If town-making, and urban life, are not a steady state of existence but surge and lapse in irregular cycles across the continents, alternative orders of human settlement should be given due attention’ (Kostof, 1991: 31).

      There are several different temporalities within any given planning system. There are the near instantaneous planning and urban service delivery decisions that are being made as a result of real-time data and visualization of it. But is this planning? Is it simply crisis management? Visualizations of real-time data convey nothing of urban planning’s normative glance to a more just or sustainable future. There is a danger of being stuck in a permanent planning present of resolving day-to-day hassles rather than the envisioning of alternative urban futures.

      There is the time frame on which plan making ought to take place if it is to command widespread support. There are separate political or bureaucratic cycles over which the preparing, making and adopting of planning documents must take place, and the time frames over which plans are monitored, evaluated and revised. It is clear that these different temporalities of planning themselves conflict, and this alone should alert us to the fundamental importance of the political and institutional support that urban planning needs to draw upon if it is to be anything at all.

      To be effective, planners need to be able to contribute on a given issue for a period of time (Krumholz, 1982). The problem is that churn is a feature of the careers of trained urban planners regardless of which citizen, club or state actors they work in the service of. Even the lesser time frames discussed above may exceed the tenure of individual planners. The meso-historical time frames needed to resolve some urban planning challenges far exceed those of particular institutional configurations of statutory planning, let alone the lives of individual citizens or trained urban planners. For example, ‘even though the science and use of scenarios in climate change projections might suggest the need for a long-term view, UK planners and planning authorities have … been inhibited in taking a long-term perspective or in engaging with futures thinking’ (Wilson, 2009: 223). In macro-historical terms, the urban planning imagination is revealed as seeking for resilience and gradual adjustment to climate change and events, but it is questionable whether and how it can respond in the short term to the increasing frequency and greater severity of climate events (Halsnæs and Laursen, 2009: 83).

      Across the global south, time is a resource that citizens know how to exploit. Inaction by states, or their inabilities to fully enforce regulations, become opportunities for income generation in tactical adjustments by street vendors (Recio, 2021). Waiting for the state to act opens the way to the autoconstruction of housing (Oldfield and Greyling, 2015). In both instances the citizen–state relationship is reconstituted. The temporal interstices of urban planning are essential to understanding some of the creative energies of global south citizens in resisting some of the institutionalized divisiveness of statutory planning.

      Statutory planners are adept at making adjustments across increments of time in trying to solve the complexities of urban development (Hoch, 2019: 51) and have become more adept at utilizing the interstices of planning processes when sanctioning temporary uses of spaces (Madanipour, 2017). Across the global north, temporary uses of urban space can introduce experiences that rub up against the fixtures of statutory urban planning practices and in which difference is affirmed (chapter 4).

      Source: Thrift and Olds (1996)

      The

Скачать книгу