Handbook of Enology, Volume 2. Pascal Ribéreau-Gayon

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Handbook of Enology, Volume 2 - Pascal Ribéreau-Gayon страница 25

Handbook of Enology, Volume 2 - Pascal Ribéreau-Gayon

Скачать книгу

50.3 ND 42.4

      An in‐depth study of the interactions between amino acids and tartaric and malic acids focused on alanine, arginine, and proline, present in the highest concentrations in wine, as well as on amino acids with alcohol functions, i.e. serine and threonine (Dartiguenave et al., 2000a).

Schematic illustration of diagram of interactions between amino acids and organic acids that result in the buffer effect.

      The impact of amino acids with alcohol functions was even more spectacular in dilute alcohol solutions (11% by volume). With only 200 mg/l serine, there was a 1.8 mEq/l increase in buffer capacity compared with only 0.8 mEq/l in water. It was also observed that adding 400 mg/l of each of the five amino acids led to a 10.4 mEq/l (36.8%) increase in the buffer capacity of a dilute alcohol solution containing 40 mM tartaric acid.

      It is surprising to note that amino acids have no significant effect on the buffer capacity of a 40 mM malic acid solution (Figure 1.7).

      All these observations highlight the role of the alcohol function, both in the solvent and in the amino acids, in interactions with organic acids, particularly tartaric acid with its two alcohol functions.

      1.4.4 Applying Buffer Capacity to the Acidification and Deacidification of Wine

Schematic illustration of variations in the buffer capacity of an aqueous solution of tartaric acid (40 mM) in the presence of several amino acids. Schematic illustration of variations in the buffer capacity of an aqueous solution of malic acid.

      Whenever tartrate addition is carried out, the effect on the pH of the medium must also be taken into account in calculating the desired increase in total acidity of the must or wine. Unfortunately, however, there is no simple relationship between total acidity and pH.

Schematic illustration of hypothetical structure of interactions between tartaric acid and amino acids

      The major difficulty in tartrate addition is predicting the decrease in pH of the must or wine. Indeed, it is important that this decrease in pH should not be incompatible with the wine's organoleptic qualities, or with a second alcoholic fermentation in the case of sparkling wines. To our knowledge, there is currently no reliable model capable of accurately predicting the drop in pH for a given level of tartrate addition. The problem is not simple, as it depends on a number of parameters. To achieve the required acidification of a wine, it is necessary to know the ratio of the initial concentrations of tartaric acid and potassium, i.e. crystallizable potassium bitartrate.

      It is also necessary to know the wine's acid–base buffer capacity. Thus, in the case of wines from cool‐climate regions, initially containing 6 g/l of malic acid and having gone through malolactic fermentation, tartrate addition may be necessary to correct an impression of “flatness” on the palate. Great care must be taken in acidifying this type of wine; otherwise it may have a final pH lower than 2.9, which certainly cures the “flatness” but produces excessive dryness or even greenness. White wines made from red grape varieties may even take on some red color.

      Examination of the results shows that adding 100 g/l to a cuvée must or wine only results in 10–15% acidification, corresponding to an increase in total acidity of approximately 0.5 g/l (H2SO4). Evaluating the acidification

Скачать книгу