Anthropology For Dummies. Cameron M. Smith

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Anthropology For Dummies - Cameron M. Smith страница 23

Anthropology For Dummies - Cameron M. Smith

Скачать книгу

to describe that world. For me, the lesson is to increase your vocabulary, and to learn other languages or at least words from other languages — you never know what new things you may find in the world.

      Gesture and body language

      In addition to spoken human language, we also use gesture, or what Adam Kendon, editor of the scholarly journal Gesture, has called “visible action as utterance.” Gesture isn’t exactly the same as a word; it’s more of a reinforcement of what you’re saying aloud. And it’s very important. You can imagine how using the wrong gestures in the wrong circumstances could cost you heavily!

      Gestures vary widely worldwide, but some common patterns occur; gestures are used globally to point, indicate a state of mind, reinforce a verbal statement, negate a verbal statement (for example, to indicate sarcasm, maybe by using “air quotes”), or to mark beginning or ending points in a conversation.

Schematic illustration of Author’s rendering of drawings in John Bulwer’s work on gesture in European society.

      © John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

      FIGURE 3-3: Author’s rendering of drawings in John Bulwer’s work on gesture in European society.

      Whereas archaeology studies ancient cultures, cultural anthropology focuses on living societies. Some reasons include

       An attempt to identify cultural similarities worldwide: Such similarities may offer very important insights into what it is to be human.

       An attempt to identify cultural differences worldwide: Such differences can illustrate the diverse ways humans have found to survive across the globe and, in some cases, through time.

       An attempt to correct supposedly common-sense ideas about humanity: This process is important because most cultures worldwide believe their own way of living is the most appropriate and right for all of humanity.

      CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY: AN EQUAL-OPPORTUNITY WHISTLE-BLOWER

      Attempting to rectify common-sense evaluations of the rest of the world is a sort of corrective for human perception of itself. The idea that one’s own culture is the best and most appropriate way to live is called ethnocentrism, and it’s been used to justify discrimination against people outside ones’ own culture for centuries and worldwide. Keep in mind that just because a cultural practice exists doesn’t necessarily mean that it’s good for the culture at large; like slavery, it may benefit a relative few at the expense of many. Robert G. Edgerton’s book Sick Societies demonstrates that many human cultural adaptations are actually maladaptations, adaptations that are actually bad for the society rather than beneficial. For example, some agricultural practices provide high yields in the short run but may burn out the soil in the long run.

      Western civilization isn’t shy about pointing out obvious problems of its own — such as racial discrimination or the fact that women make significantly less money than men at the same jobs — and should remain open to the possibility that such problems are possible in other cultures. In this way, cultural anthropology isn’t a discipline focused on bashing Western civilization; it’s an objective science that doesn’t idealize any society over another.

      Putting the culture in cultural anthropology

      Whatever end you hope to achieve through cultural anthropology, the means are going to be a study of culture. Culture has been defined in many ways; I give you a definition in the section “The biocultural animal” earlier in this chapter, and you can take entire graduate-level courses just to grapple with culture theory. Generally speaking, culture encompasses everything from attitudes toward material objects to philosophical, political, and religious concepts.

      Important features of culture include the following:

       Culture isn’t genetic; it’s learned. Each new generation doesn’t receive it in genes but from parents, siblings, and anyone else in the culture (largely through language).

       Culture is shared among a population, but it allows variation within it. Individuals of a culture may have their own interpretations of the culture’s set of descriptions of the universe and instructions for how to live properly in it. This discrepancy is important because it recognizes a major characteristic of humanity: individuality, the fact that humans aren’t typically of one mind but rather are individuals with a great deal of individual personality (humans are messy in this way!).

       Cultural information is often symbolic. Symbols — which are linguistic, visual, and gestural metaphors that stand for something else — are heavily influential in the communication of culture from one generation to the next.

      Although cultural information rides in the brain, humans can also express it physically. Material objects — for example, seagoing canoes, totem poles, or sports cars — are also expressions of certain cultural ideas. Even the most apparently utilitarian artifacts, like writing pens, can and often do carry cultural information. A glitter-spangled, bubblegum-pink pen is more likely to belong to an adolescent girl than to a public official; the official probably requires a fancier pen to project a certain image in public ceremonies. Material objects, then, constitute culture; some call the study of such items the study of material culture. Because archaeologists study ancient cultures through their artifacts — which are material culture — they’ve made the most thorough studies of material culture.

      Attempting to explain why humans do what they do

      Cultural anthropologists have devised many fascinating and complex bodies of theory to explain humanity and the diversity and commonalities of human cultures. Among them:

       Evolutionary approaches (including materialist approaches) that seek explanations by looking for the adaptive advantages of various cultural practices — such as cannibalism or social ranking — worldwide. These theories seem to explain some things, but critics argue that they ignore the significance of individual action, which is sometimes known as agency.

       Functionalist approaches that understand elements of culture as each working in an integrated way to promote the culture’s welfare. Critics claim that these approaches ignore the importance of conflict, which is always present in culture (particularly those with social rank or class differences).

       Postmodern approaches that focus on conflicts, individual agency, and other nonstandard aspects of culture. Critics argue that such approaches,

Скачать книгу