Algebra and Applications 1. Abdenacer Makhlouf

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Algebra and Applications 1 - Abdenacer Makhlouf страница 20

Algebra and Applications 1 - Abdenacer Makhlouf

Скачать книгу

alt="image"/> on a vector space V over a field image is said to be non-degenerate if its polar form

image

      is so, that is, if its radical V := {vV : n(v, V) = 0} is trivial. Moreover, n is said to be non-singular either if it is non-degenerate or if it satisfies that the dimension of V is 1 and n(V) ≠ 0. The last possibility only occurs over fields of characteristic 2.

      DEFINITION 2.1.– A composition algebra over a field image is a triple (image, ∙, n) where

       – (, ∙) is a non-associative algebra;

       – is a non-singular quadratic form that is multiplicative, that is,

      for any x, image.

      The unital composition algebras are called Hurwitz algebras.

      For simplicity, we will usually refer to the composition algebra image.

      Our goal in this section is to prove that Hurwitz algebras are quite close to ℝ, ℂ, ℍ and image.

      for any x, y, z, image.

      PROPOSITION 2.2.– Let (image, ∙, n) be a Hurwitz algebra:

       – either n is non-degenerate or char and is isomorphic to the ground field (with norm α ↦ α2);

       – the map is an involution. That is, and for any x, . This involution is referred to as the standard conjugation;

       – if ∗ denotes the conjugation of a linear endomorphism relative to n (i.e. n(f(x), y) = n(x, f∗(y)) for any x, y), then for the left and right multiplications by elements we have and ;

       – any satisfies the Cayley–Hamilton equation:

       – (, ∙) is an alternative algebra: x ∙ (x ∙ y) = x∙2 ∙ y and (y ∙ x) ∙ x = y ∙ x∙2 for any x, .

image

      and symmetrically we get image.

      Now, if char image and image, with n(a) ≠ 0, then for any x, image, image, so image and ax = f (x)a for a linear map image. But n(a)n(x) = n(ax) = f (x)2n(a). Hence n(x) = f (x)2 for any x and, by linearization, n(x, y) = 2f (x) f (y) = 0 for any x, y. We conclude that image. In this case, all the assertions are trivial.

      Assuming hence that image (n is non-degenerate), since image is an isometry of order 2 (reflection relative to image) we get

image

      for any x, y, z, whence image.

      Finally, for any x, y, z, using again [2.5],

image

      so that, using left-right symmetry:

      With y = 1, this gives image and hence the Cayley–Hamilton equation. However, image and this shows x ∙ (xy) = x∙2y. Symmetrically we get (yx) ∙ x = yx∙2. □

      2.3.1. The Cayley–Dickson doubling process and the generalized Hurwitz theorem

      Let (image, ∙, n) be a Hurwitz algebra, and assume that image is a proper unital subalgebra of image such that the restriction of n to image is non-degenerate. Our goal is to show that in this case

Скачать книгу