Hope Under Neoliberal Austerity. Группа авторов
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу Hope Under Neoliberal Austerity - Группа авторов страница 16
![Hope Under Neoliberal Austerity - Группа авторов Hope Under Neoliberal Austerity - Группа авторов](/cover_pre940925.jpg)
McCann, P. (2016) The UK Regional-National Economic Problem, London: Routledge.
McCord, N. (1979) North East England: The Region’s Development 1760–1960, London: Batsford.
Midgley, J., Ward, N. and Atterton, J. (2005) ‘City regions and rural areas in the North East of England’, Centre for Rural Economy research report, University of Newcastle upon Tyne. Available at: www.ncl.ac.uk/media/wwwnclacuk/centreforruraleconomy/files/city-regions-full.pdf
Olsover, L. (1981) The Jewish Communities of North East England, 1755–1980, Gateshead: Ashley Mark Publishing Company.
ONS (Office for National Statistics) (2013) ‘2011 Census analysis: comparing rural and urban areas of England and Wales’. Available at: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20160105224826/http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/census/2011-census-analysis/rural-urban-analysis/comparing-rural-and-urban-areas-of-england-and-wales.html
ONS (Office for National Statistics) (2017) ‘RPUB1 regional labour market: regional public and private employment dataset’. Available at: www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/employmentandemployeetypes/datasets/regionalpublicandprivateemployment
ONS (Office for National Statistics) (2018) ‘Regional economic activity by gross value added 1998–2017’, Statistical Bulletin. Available at: www.ons.gov.uk/economy/grossvalueaddedgva/bulletins/regionalgrossvalueaddedbalanceduk/1998to2017
ONS (Office for National Statistics) (2019) ‘Regional labour market statistics in the UK: January 2020’. Available at: www.nomisweb.co.uk/
Pike, A. (1999) ‘The politics of factory closures and task forces in the north east region of England’, Regional Studies, 33(6): 567–75.
Raikes, L., Giovannini, A. and Getzel, B. (2019) ‘Divided and connected: regional inequalities in the North, the UK and the developed world, state of the North 2019’, IPPR. Available at: www.ippr.org/files/2019-11/sotn-2019.pdf
Rallings, C. and Thrasher, M. (2006) ‘“Just another expensive talking shop”: public attitudes and the 2004 regional assembly referendum in the North East of England’, Regional Studies, 40(8): 927–36.
Renton, D. (2008) Colour Blind? Race and Migration in North East England since 1945, Sunderland: University of Sunderland Press.
Scott, G. (2019) ‘Leading centre for technology modelled on MIT could be coming to Leeds’, Yorkshire Post, 22 December.
Shaw, K. and Robinson, F. (2018) ‘Whatever happened to the North East? Reflections on the end of regionalism in England’, Local Economy, 33(8): 842–61.
South Tyneside Council (2017) ‘Brexploration: charting a course for our post-Brexit future by engaging public and private sector community stakeholders in collaborative discussion’. Available at: https://northeastca.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/BREXploration-Commission-Report-circulated-at-the-meeting.pdf
UK2070 Commission (2019) ‘Fairer and stronger: rebalancing the UK economy’. Available at: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1DaPlONpLXwxS1lE2kLu3aQVkOQEmFLwB/view
Vall, N. (2011) North-East England Cultural Region: 1945–2000, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Ward, M. (2018) ‘City deals’, House of Commons Briefing Paper 7158. Available at: https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn07158/
Wilson, J. and Paun, A. (2019) ‘English devolution: combined authorities and metro mayors’, Institute for Government, 15 July. Available at: www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/explainers/english-devolution-combined-authorities-and-metro-mayors
The public sector and civil society
The public sector and civil society: introduction
Mel Steer, Simin Davoudi, Liz Todd and Mark Shucksmith
There is no definitive, universally agreed definition of what social welfare is (Lowe, 1993), and in the UK, ‘social welfare’, ‘social security’ and the ‘welfare state’ are terms that are often used interchangeably to refer to the provision of a lifeline, a safety net, to help people cope during periods of disruption or crisis. While welfare provision is often associated with the post-war social-democratic states and, in Britain, the introduction of the NHS in 1945, Alcock’s (2016) historical account demonstrates that charitable forms of welfare provision existed before, for example, the Poor Law of 1601 in England, where parishes administered relief to the destitute, and measures introduced in the 19th century that applied to large sections of the population regarding access to education, hospitals and sanitation. However, social infrastructures such as schools and hospitals were typically owned by churches and voluntary organisations, or funded by private individuals, rather than the state (Alcock, 2016). This tradition of charitable and voluntary welfare provision has continued to date, leading to the involvement of multiple actors and creating diversity in terms of the manner of service delivery, staff ethos and the purpose and accountability of the organisations.
Across the public, voluntary, community and private sectors, increased prominence is given to collectively produced welfare services through co-production and collaboration. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD, 2011) simply defines co-production in terms of a model incorporating diverse organisations operating in distinct ways and with differing levels of engagement from and involvement of civil society organisations, service users and citizens. The case studies included in Part I of this book draw on co-production in its various forms and incorporate a number of different providers, addressing issues that affect different aspects of people’s lives in interlocking ways that impact life chances and outcomes. All case-study chapters are co-written by university researchers and those working for organisations outside the university. Some of the case studies are well established and others represent relatively new initiatives or ways of working. A common thread running through the case-study practices is their aim to provide more than a lifeline through a crisis. Instead, they aim to deliver sustainable, transformative change that reshapes people’s social and