(accessed 2 August 2019).49 Midwifery (2020). Programme (2010) in Association with Department of Health & Social Care Midwifery 2020: Delivering Expectations. Cambridge: Jill Rogers Associates.
50 Moloney, S. and Gair, S. (2015). Empathy and spiritual carein midwifery practice: contributing to women's enhanced birth experiences. Women & Birth 28 (4): 323–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2015.04.009.
51 Morad, S., Parry‐Smith, W., and McSherry, W. (2013). Dignity in maternity care. Evidence Based Midwifery 11 (2): 67–70.
52 Newnham, E. and Kirkham, M. (2019). Beyond autonomy: care ethics for midwifery and the humanisation of birth. Nursing Ethics 26 (7–8): 2147–2157.
53 Newnham, E., McKellar, L., and Pincombe, J. (2017). “It's your body, but …” Mixed messages to childbirth education: findings from a hospital ethnography. Midwifery 55: 53–59.
54 NHS England (2016). Better Births: Improving Outcomes of Maternity Services in England: A Five Year Forward for Better Maternity Care. NHS England.
55 NHS England (2017). Implementing Better Births: Continuity of carer. https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp‐content/uploads/2017/12/implementing‐better‐births.pdf (accessed 23 January 2019).
56 Nicholls, L. and Webb, C. (2006). What makes a good miwife? An integrative reviw of methodologically‐diverse research. Journal of Advanced Nursing 56 (4): 414–429.
57 Nieuwenhuijze, M.J., Korstjens, I., de Jonge, A. et al. (2014). On speaking terms: a Delphi study on shared decision‐making in maternity care. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 14: 223.
58 NMC (2018). Code of Professional Conduct. London: The Nursing and Midwifery Council Publications.
59 Noseworthy, D.A., Phibbs, R.A., and Benn, C.A. (2013). Towards a relational model of decision‐making in midwifery care. Midwifery 29 (7): e42–e48.
60 Overgaard, C., Fenger‐Gron, M., and Sandall, J. (2014). The impact of birthplace on women's birth experiences and perceptions of care. Social Science & Medicine 74 (7): 973–981.
61 Pembroke, N.F. and Pembroke, J.J. (2008). The spirituality of presence in midwifery care. Midwifery 24: 321–327.
62 Prainsack, B. and Buyx, A. (2011). Solodarity: Reflections on an Emerging Concept in Bioethics. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics.
63 Raynor, M. and England, C. (2010). Psychology for Midwives: Pregnancy, Birth and Puerperium. London: Open University press.
64 Reed, R., Rowe, J., and Barnes, M. (2016). Midwifery practice during birth: ritual companionship. Women and Birth 29: 269–278.
65 Renfew, M.J., Dyson, L., Herbet, G. et al. (2008). Developing evidence based recommendations in public health: incorporating the views of practitioners, service users and user representatives. Health Expectations 11 (1): 3–15.
66 Rodgers, B.L. (1989). Concepts, analysis and the development of nursing knowledge: the evolutionary cycle. Journal of Advanced Nursing 14: 330–335.
67 Ross‐Davie, M. and Cheyne, H. (2014). Intrapartum support: what do women want? A literature review. Evidence Based Midwifery 12 (2): 52–58.
68 Royal College of Midwives (2017). Can continuity work for us? A resource for midwives. London: Royal College of Midwives Publication.
69 Sandall, J. (2017). The Contribution of Continuity of Midwifery Care to High Quality Maternity Care. London: Royal College of Midwives.
70 Sandall, J., Soltani, H., Gate, S. et al. (2015). Midwife‐led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (8). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub5 (Accessed 14 September 2019).
71 Smith, J. (2016). Decision making in midwifery: a tripartite clinical decision. British Journal of Midwifery 24 (8): 574–580.
72 Smith, E., Ross, F., Donovan, S. et al. (2008). Service user involvement in nursing, midwifery and health visiting research: a review of the evidence and practice. International Journal of Nursing Studies 45 (2): 298–315.
73 Taylor, B., Cross‐Sudworth, F., and MacArthur, C. (2018). Better Births and Continuity: Midwife Survey Results. Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham.
74 Thompson, F.E. (2005). The emotional impact on mothers and midwives of conflict between workplace and personal/professional ethics. Australian Midwifery 18 (3): 17–21.
75 Thompson, A. (2013). Midwives' experiences of caring fro women whose requests are not within policies and guidelines. British Journal of Midwifery 21 (8): 564–570.
76 Thompson, S.M., Nieuwenhuize, M.J., Kane Low, L., and de Vries, R. (2016). Exploring Dutch midwives' attitudes to promoting physiological childbirth: a qualitative study. Midwifery 42: 67–73.
77 Walsh, D. and Devane, D. (2012). A metasynthesis of midwife‐led care. Qualitative Health Research 22 (7): 897.
78 Weltens, M., de Nooijer, J., and Nieuwenhuijze, M. (2019). Influencing factors in midwives' decision making during childbirth: a qualitiative study in the Netherlands. Women & Birth 32 (2): e197–e203.
79 Whitburn, L.Y., Jones, L.E., Davey, M.A., and McDonald, S. (2019). The nature of labour pain: an updated review of the literature. Women & Birth 32: 28–38.
80 Yoshida, Y. and Sandall, J. (2013). Occupational burnout and work factors in community and hospital midwives: a survey analysis. Midwifery 29 (8): 921–926.
Конец ознакомительного фрагмента.
Текст предоставлен ООО «ЛитРес».
Прочитайте эту книгу целиком, купив полную легальную версию на ЛитРес.
Безопасно оплатить книгу можно банковской картой Visa, MasterCard, Maestro, со счета мобильного телефона, с платежного терминала, в салоне МТС или Связной, через PayPal, WebMoney, Яндекс.Деньги, QIWI Кошелек, бонусными картами или другим удобным Вам способом.
