307–314.65 Erikson, K. T. (1966). Wayward puritans. New York, NY: Wiley.
66 Fairbanks, C. M. (1992). Labels, literacy, and enabling learning: Glenn’s story. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 475–493.
67 Fine, M. (1991). Framing dropouts: Notes on the politics of an urban public high school. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
68 Flower, R. M. (1984). Delivery of speech‐language and audiology services. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
69 Fombonne, E. (2003). Epidemiological surveys of autism and other pervasive developmental disorders: An update. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 33, 365–382.
70 Forness, S. R. (1976). Behavioristic orientation to categorical labels. Journal of School Psychology, 14, 90–95.
71 Fox, P. (1989). From senility to Alzheimer’s disease: The rise of the Alzheimer’s movement. Milbank Quarterly, 67, 58–102.
72 Fraser, L., & Christopher, B. (2007). Is the use of labels in special education helpful? Support for Learning, 22, 36–42.
73 Frattura, E., & Capper, C. A. (2006). Segregated programs versus integrated comprehensive service delivery for all learners: Assessing the differences. Remedial and Special Education, 27(6), 355–364.
74 Gelb, S. A., & Mizokawa, D. T. (1986). Special education and social structure: The commonality of “exceptionality”. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 543–557.
75 Gergen, K. J., & Davis, K. E. (Eds.) (1985). The social construction of the person. New York, NY: Springer.
76 Gernsbacher, M. A., Dawson, M., & Goldsmith, H. H. (2005). Three reasons not to believe in an autism epidemic. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(2), 55–58.
77 Gibbs, S., & Elliott, J. (2015). The differential effects of labelling: How do ‘dyslexia’ and ‘reading difficulties’ affect teachers’ beliefs. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 30, 323–337.
78 Gill, V. T., & Maynard, D. W. (1995). On “Labeling” in actual interaction: Delivering and receiving diagnoses of developmental disabilities. Social Problems, 42(1), 11–37.
79 Gillman, M., Heyman, B., & Swain, J. (2000). What's in a name? The implications of diagnosis for people with learning difficulties and their family carers. Disability and Society, 15(3), 389–409.
80 Gipps, C. (1999). Socio‐cultural aspects of assessment. Review of Research in Education, 24, 355–392.
81 Glaser, R., & Silver, E. (1994). Assessment, testing, and instruction: Retrospect and prospect. In L. Darling‐Hammond (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 20, pp. 393–421). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
82 Goffman, E. (1964). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster, Inc.
83 Goldstein, H. (1996). Statistical and psychometric models for assessment. In H. Goldstein & T. Lewis (Eds.), Assessment: Problems, developments and statistical issues (pp. 41–54). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
84 Goodman, N. (1978). Ways of world making. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.
85 Goodwin, C. (2014). Foreword. In M. J. Ball, N. Müller, & R. L. Nelson (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research in communication disorders (pp. xi–xv). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
86 Gould, S. J. (1996). The mismeasure of man (Revised and expanded ed.). New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
87 Grigorenko, E. L. (2009). Dynamic assessment and response to intervention. Two sides of one coin. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 111–132.
88 Gross, J. (1994). Asperger syndrome: A label worth having? Educational Psychology in Practice, 10(2), 104–110.
89 Guendouzi, J., & Müller, N. (2006). Approaches to discourse in dementia. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
90 Gus, L. (2000). Autism: Promoting peer understanding. Educational Psychology in Practice, 16(4), 461–468.
91 Gutkin, T. B., & Nemeth, C. (1997). Selected factors impacting decision in prereferral intervention and other school‐based teams: Exploring the intersection between school and social psychology. Journal of School Psychology, 35, 195–216.
92 Halpern, S. A. (1990). Medicalization as a professional process: Postward trends in pediatrics. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 31, 28–42.
93 Hamayan, E., Marler, B., Sanchez‐Lopez, C., & Damico, J. (2013). Special education considerations for English language learners: A handbook for intervention teams (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Caslon Publishing.
94 Heise, D. R. (2007). Expressive order: Confirming sentiments in social actions. New York, NY: Springer.
95 Hood, L., McDermott, R., & Cole, M. (1980). “Let’s try to make it a good day”—some not so simple ways. Discourse Processes, 3, 155–168.
96 Iran‐Nejad, A. (1995). Constructivism as substitute for memorization in learning: Meaning is created by learner. Education, 116, 16–31.
97 Jensen, P. S., Mrazek, M. D., & Knapp, P. K. (1997). Evolution and revolution in child psychiatry: ADHD as a disorder of adaptation. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 36, 1672–1679.
98 Kamhi, A. G. (2014). Improving clinical practices for children with language and learning disorders. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 45, 92–103.
99 Kaufmann, J. M., Hallahan, D. P., & Lloyd, J. W. (1998). Politics, science, and the future of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 21, 276–270.
100 Kavale, K. A., & Forness, S. R. (1998). The politics of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 21, 245–273.
101 Kavale, K. A., & Forness, S. R. (2000). Policy decisions in special education: The role of meta‐analysis. In R. Gersten, E. P. Schiller, & S. Vaughn (Eds.), Contemporary special education research: Synthesis of the knowledge base on critical instructional issues (pp. 281–326). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
102 Kelly, N., & Norwich, B. (2004). Pupils’ perceptions of self and of labels: Moderate learning difficulties in mainstream and special schools. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(3), 411–435.
103 Kirk, S. A., & Kutchins, H. (1992). The selling of DSM: The rhetoric of science in psychiatry. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
104 Klasen, H. (2000). A name, what’s in a name? The medicalization of hyperactivity revisited. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 7, 334–344.
105 Klassen, R., Tze, V., Betts, S., & Gordon, K. (2011). Teacher efficacy research 1998–2009: Signs of progress or unfulfilled promise? Educational Psychology Review, 23, 21–43.
106 Kliewer, C., Biklen, D., & Kasa‐Hendrickson, C. (2006). Who may be literate? Disability and resistance to the cultural denial of competence. American Educational Research Journal, 43(2), 163–192.
107 Kretschmer, R. E. (1991). Exceptionality and the limited English proficient student: Historical and practical
