Genetic Disorders and the Fetus. Группа авторов

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Genetic Disorders and the Fetus - Группа авторов страница 168

Genetic Disorders and the Fetus - Группа авторов

Скачать книгу

Moll R, Franke WW, Schiller DL, et al. The catalog of human cytokeratins: patterns of expression in normal epithelia, tumors and cultured cells. Cell 1982; 31:11.

      587 587. Ochs BA, Franke WW, Moll R, et al. Epithelial character and morphologic diversity of cell cultures from human amniotic fluids examined by immunofluorescence microscopy and gel electrophoresis of cytoskeletal proteins. Differentiation 1983; 24:153.

      588 588. Hoehn H, Bryant EM, Karp LE, et al. Cultivated cells from diagnostic amniocentesis in second trimester pregnancies. II. Cytogenetic parameters as functions of clonal type and preparative technique. Clin Genet 1975; 7:29.

      589 589. Regauer S, Franke WW, Virtanen I. Intermediate filament cytoskeleton of amnion epithelium and cultured amnion epithelial cells: expression of epidermal cytokeratins in cells of a simple epithelium. J Cell Biol 1985; 100:997.

      590 590. Hsu LY, Kaffe S, Perlis TE. A revisit of trisomy 20 mosaicism in prenatal diagnosis – an overview of 103 cases. Prenat Diagn 1991; 11:7.

      591 591. Van Dyke DL, Roberson JR, Babu VR, et al. Trisomy 20 mosaicism identified prenatally and confirmed in foreskin fibroblasts. Prenat Diagn 1989; 9:601.

      592 592. Bell JE, Barron L, Raab G. Antenatal detection of neural tube defects: comparison of biochemical and immunofluorescence methods. Prenat Diagn 1994; 14:615.

      593 593. Melancon SB, Lee SY, Nadler HL. Histidase activity in cultivated human amniotic fluid cells. Science 1971; 173:627.

      594 594. Gerbie AB, Melancon SB, Ryan C, et al. Cultivated epithelial‐like cells and fibroblasts from amniotic fluid: their relationship to enzymatic and cytologic analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1972; 114:314.

      595 595. Van der Veer E, Kleijer WJ, de Josselin de Jong JE, Galjaard H. Lysosomal enzyme activities in different types of amniotic fluid cells measured by microchemical methods, combined with interference microscopy. Hum Genet 1978; 40:285.

      596 596. Burton BK, Gerbie AB, Nadler HL. Biochemical and biological problems and pitfalls of cell culture for prenatal diagnosis. In: Milunsky A, ed. Genetic disorders and the fetus: diagnosis prevention, and treatment. New York: Plenum Press, 1979:369.

      597 597. Hoehn H, Bryant EM, Fantel AG, et al. Cultivated cells from diagnostic amniocentesis in second trimester pregnancies. III. The fetal urine as a potential source of clonable cells. Humangenetik 1975; 29:285.

      598 598. Chang HC, Jones OW. Amniocentesis: cell culture of human amniotic fluid in a hormone supplement. In: Sirbasku DA, Pardee AB, Sato GH, eds. Growth of cells in hormonally defined media (Cold Spring Harbor Conferences on Cell Proliferation). Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1982:1187.

      599 599. Medina‐Gomez P, Bard JB. Analysis of normal and abnormal amniotic fluid cells in vitro by cinemicrography. Prenat Diagn 1983; 3:311.

      600 600. Harris A. Glycoproteins that distinguish different cell types found in amniotic fluid. Hum Genet 1982; 62:188.

      601 601. Felix JS, Sun TT, Littlefield JW. Human epithelial cells cultured from urine: growth properties and keratin staining. In Vitro 1980; 16:866.

      602 602. von Koskull H, Aula P, Trejdosiewicz LK, et al. Identification of cells from fetal bladder epithelium in human amniotic fluid. Hum Genet 1984; 65:262.

      603 603. Richkind KE, Risch NJ. Sensitivity of chromosomal mosaicism detection by different tissue culture methods. Prenat Diagn 1990; 10:519.

      604 604. Hoehn HW. Fluid cell culture. In: Milunsky A, ed. Genetic disorders and the fetus, 4th edn. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998: 128.

      605 605. Kennerknecht I, Baur‐Aubele S, Grab D, et al. First trimester amniocentesis between the seventh and 13th weeks: evaluation of the earliest possible genetic diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 1992; 12:595.

      606 606. Casey ML, Word RA, MacDonald PC. Endothelin‐1 gene expression and regulation of endothelin mRNA and protein biosynthesis in avascular human amnion. Potential source of amniotic fluid endothelin. J Biol Chem 1991; 266:5762.

      607 607. Chang HC, Jones OW. Reduction of sera requirements in amniotic fluid cell culture. Prenat Diagn 1985; 5:305.

      608 608. Liu L, Brinkman A, Blat C, et al. IGFBP‐1, an insulin like growth factor binding protein, is a cell growth inhibitor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1991; 174:673.

      609 609. Priest JH, Rao KW. Prenatal chromosome diagnosis. In: Barch MJ, ed. The AGT cytogenetics laboratory manual, 3rd edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1997:199.

      610 610. Schmid W. A technique for in situ karyotyping of primary amniotic fluid cell cultures. Humangenetik 1975; 30:325.

      611 611. Hoehn H, Rodriguez ML, Norwood TH, et al. Mosaicism in amniotic fluid cell cultures: classification and significance. Am J Med Genet 1978; 2:253.

      612 612. Boué J, Nicolas H, Barichard F, et al. Le clonage des cellules du liquide amniotique, aide dans l'interpretation des mosaiques chromosomiques en diagnostic prenatal. Ann Genet 1979; 22:3.

      613 613. Hecht F, Peakman DC, Kaiser‐McCaw B, et al. Amniocyte clones for prenatal cytogenetics. Am J Med Genet 1981; 10:51.

      614 614. Tabor A, Lind AM, Andersen AM, et al. A culture vessel for amniotic fluid cells allowing faster preparation of chromosome slides. Prenat Diagn 1984; 4:451.

      615 615. Benn PA, Hsu LY. Maternal cell contamination of amniotic fluid cell cultures: results of a U.S. nationwide survey. Am J Med Genet 1983; 15:297.

      616 616. Bui TH, Iselius L, Lindsten J. European collaborative study on prenatal diagnosis: mosaicism, pseudomosaicism and single abnormal cells in amniotic fluid cell cultures. Prenat Diagn 1984; 4 Spec No:145.

      617 617. Worton RG, Stern R. A Canadian collaborative study of mosaicism in amniotic fluid cell cultures. Prenat Diagn 1984; 4 Spec No:131.

      618 618. Batanian JR, Ledbetter DH, Fenwick RG. A simple VNTR‐PCR method for detecting maternal cell contamination in prenatal diagnosis. Genet Test 1998; 2:347.

      619 619. Frederickson RM, Wang HS, Surh LC. Some caveats in PCR‐based prenatal diagnosis on direct amniotic fluid versus cultured amniocytes. Prenat Diagn 1999; 19:113.

      620 620. Smith GW, Graham CA, Nevin J, et al. Detection of maternal cell contamination in amniotic fluid cell cultures using fluorescent labelled microsatellites. J Med Genet 1995; 32:61.

      621 621. Claussen U, Schafer H, Trampisch HJ. Exclusion of chromosomal mosaicism in prenatal diagnosis. Hum Genet 1984; 67:23.

      622 622. Sikkema‐Raddatz B, Castedo S, TeMeerman GJ. Probability tables for exclusion of mosaicism in prenatal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 1997; 17:115.

      623 623. American College of Medical Genetics. Standards and guidelines for clinical genetics laboratories, 2nd edn. Bethesda, MD: American College of Medical Genetics, 1999.

      624 624. American College of Medical Genetics. Standards and guidelines for clinical genetics laboratories, 2008. https://www.acmg.net/ACMG/Medical-Genetics-Practice-Resources/Technical_Standards_and_Guidelines.aspx (accessed July 8, 2020).

      625 625. Spurbeck JL, Zinsmeister AR, Meyer KJ, et al. Dynamics of chromosome spreading. Am J Med Genet 1996; 61:387.

      626 626. Henegariu O, Heerema NA, Lowe Wright L, et al. Improvements

Скачать книгу