fabrication of new hybrid natural FRP composites. Other properties of hybrid natural FRP composites, such as thermal, acoustic, electrical, water absorption, among others, are directly dependent on the mechanical behaviors.
The prospect for FRP composite materials is very high and bright. It is presumed that in the next decade, application of various hybrid natural FRP composite materials would have penetrated all facets of life. This will be made possible through enhanced mechanical behaviors of a new set of composites as fiber selection, extraction, treatment, interfacial adhesion with matrix, and processing of natural FRP composite are improved [6].
In addition, there have been significant developments in natural FRP hybrid composites in the past few decades, due to established advantages in terms of processing, low cost, biodegradability, renewability, high specific strength, sustainability, as well as low relative density. Various natural fiber types have been and are being studied, with the findings forming the basis for replacing synthetic fibers, including both carbon and glass. Primarily, the idea of biocomposites development centers around the generation of novel FRP composites that are environmentally friendly with respect to how they are produced, used, and discarded. Hence, natural FRP composites could be a valid replacement and even superior alternative to synthetic fiber composites. Their biodegradable nature offers a good solution to the problem of waste disposal often experienced with synthetic fiber, petroleum, or non‐renewable polymer‐based materials. The application of biocomposites is widening continually and is projected to expand more, with more effects in Europe, due to mounting legislative and public pressures.
Till now, adhesion between the natural reinforcements/fiber and matrix interface, as hybridization increases, remains a major object of concern in terms of overall performance of natural FRP hybrid composites. This is a major factor in the ultimate properties, especially mechanical responses of the biocomposites. Further cutting‐edge research is therefore necessary in order to overcome this challenge. Also, there is a requirement for more research work in order to get over other challenges such as inadequate toughness, moisture absorption, and stability reduction in long‐term outdoor applications. Particularly, various weather conditions, humidity, temperature, and ultraviolet radiation, have significant influence on the product service life of natural FRP hybrid composites. For example, ultraviolet exposure results in discoloring, property deterioration, and deformation.
c Lastly, identifying better extraction of raw materials, sustaining crop growth, product design, and manufacture are activities that will help to reach the goal of better natural FRP hybrid composites. Hence, further research is ongoing across the globe to overcome the aforementioned challenges of biocomposites. Their respective properties should form the basis for generating new applications and create more opportunities for these biocomposites in the present‐day green environment and secured future.
1.7 Conclusions
Owing to the sustainability, environmental friendliness, low cost of production, biodegradability, as well as enhanced mechanical behaviors of natural FRP composites through hybridization techniques, natural FRP composites are competing with and replacing some synthetic or conventional FRP composites, including both glass and carbon FRP composites. From the studies reported in this chapter, it is evident that mechanical behaviors of some natural FRP hybrid composites, especially impact, tensile, and flexural strengths and moduli, were higher than those of their non‐hybrid or single FRP counterparts. Also, the degree of mechanical responses of the natural FRP hybrid composites depends on various areas of their engineering applications, as structural, semi, and/or non‐structural composite systems.
References
1 1 Elsner, P., Henning, F., and Weidenmann, K.A. (2009). Composite materials. In: Technology Guide (ed. H.‐J. Bullinger), 24–29. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer‐Verlag.
2 2 Bispoa, S.J.L., Freire, R.C.S., and De Aquinoa, E.M.F. (2015). Mechanical properties analysis of polypropylene biocomposites reinforced with curaua fibre. Mater. Res. 18 (4): 833–837.
3 3 Zuccarello, B. and Marannano, G. (2018). Random short sisal fibre biocomposites: optimal manufacturing process and reliable theoretical models. Mater. Des. 149: 87–100.
4 4 Nguyen, H., Zatar, W., and Mutsuyoshi, H. (2017). Mechanical Properties of Hybrid Polymer Composite. Elsevier Ltd.
5 5 Pickering, K.L., Efendy, M.G.A., and Le, T.M. (2016). A review of recent developments in natural fibre composites and their mechanical performance. Composites Part A 83: 98–112.
6 6 Faruk, O., Bledzki, A.K., Fink, H.P., and Sain, M. (2012). Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibres: 2000–2010. Prog. Polym. Sci. 37: 1552–1596.
7 7 Bergstrom, J.S. (2015). Mechanics of Solid Polymers: Theory and Computational Modeling. William Andrew.
8 8 Sathishkumar, T.P., Naveen, J., and Satheeshkumar, S. (2014). Hybrid fibre reinforced polymer composites – a review. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 33 (5): 454–471.
9 9 Kuma, T.S.M., Senthilkumar, K., Chandrasekar, M. et al. (2019). Investigation into mechanical, absorption and swelling behaviour of hemp/sisal fibre reinforced bioepoxy hybrid composites: effects of stacking sequences. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 140: 637–646.
10 10 Fragassa, C. (2016). Effect of natural fibres and bio‐resins on mechanical properties in hybrid and non‐hybrid composites. AIP Conference Proceedings, Volume 1736.
11 11 Saw, S.K., Sarkhel, G., and Choudhury, A. (2012). Effect of layering pattern on the physical, mechanical and thermal properties of Jute/Bagasse hybrid fibre‐reinforced epoxy novolac composites. Soc. Polym. Eng. 33 (10): 1824–1831.
12 12 Wambua, P., Ivens, J., and Verpoest, I. (2003). Natural fibres: can they replace glass in fibre reinforced plastics? Compos. Sci. Technol. 63 (9): 1259–1264.
13 13 Santulli, C., Janssen, M., and Jeronimidis, G. (2005). Partial replacement of E‐glass fibres with flax fibres in composites and effect on falling weight impact performance. J. Mater. Sci. 40 (13): 3581–3585.
14 14 Almeida Júnior, J.H.S., Ornaghi Júnior, H.L., Amico, S.C., and Amado, F.D.R. (2012). Study of hybrid intralaminate curaua/glass composites. Mater. Des. 42: 111–117.
15 15 Santulli, C. (2007). Impact properties of glass/plant fibre hybrid laminates. J. Mater. Sci. 42 (11): 3699–3707.
16 16 Fukuda, H. (1984). An advanced theory of the strength of hybrid composites. J. Mater. Sci. 19 (3): 974–982.
17 17 Wang, X., Hu, B., Feng, Y. et al. (2008). Low velocity impact properties of 3D woven basalt/aramid hybrid composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 68 (2): 444–450.
18 18 Fiore, V., Scalici, T., Calabrese, L. et al. (2016). Effect of external basalt layers on durability behaviour of flax reinforced composites. Composites Part B 84: 258–265.
19 19 Pandey, A., Soccol, C.R., Nigam, P., and Soccol, V.T. (2000). Biotechnological potential of agro‐industrial residues. I: Sugarcane bagasse. Bioresour. Technol. 74 (1): 69–80.
20 20 Saw, S.K. and Datta, C. (2009). Thermomechanical properties of jute/bagasse hybrid fibre reinforced epoxy thermoset composites. BioResources 4 (4): 1455–1476.
21 21 Han, G., Lei, Y., Wu, Q. et al. (2008). Bamboo‐fibre filled high density polyethylene composites: effect of coupling treatment and nanoclay. J. Polym. Environ. 16 (2): 123–130.
22 22 Takagi, H. and Ichihara, Y. (2004). Effect of fibre length on mechanical properties of ‘green’ composites using a starch‐based resin and short bamboo fibres. JSME Int. J. Series A Solid Mech.
