homeless and vulnerable people, were all suddenly more socially and economically isolated by virtue of their digital disconnection. Soon after cities began to shut down, reports appeared of people working from their cars in library parking lots, attempting to use the Wi-Fi from outside.
Why Wi-Fi?
The short-range wireless networking capabilities we commonly call Wi-Fi first became part of everyday digital experience (and everyday digital folklore) two decades prior to the pandemic, when then-Apple CEO Steve Jobs famously showed off his company’s new notebook computer, the iBook. The iBook of 1999 was a colourful, translucently plastic device. As a millennial design object, it broke with the blocky, grey, corporate-looking laptops of the time. The iBook invited us to see through its translucent case into the machine’s internals, and its organic form and integrated handle suggested an easy portability. The built-in Wi-Fi promised a seamlessly connected future, signalling the end of the era when communication was constrained by the messy physicality of cables, plugs, and sockets.
The iBook was new, but it popularized a technology that had been in development for well over a decade, building on ideas and applications with a considerably longer history. We discuss some of these below and in the chapters that follow. From today’s vantage point, Wi-Fi is no longer an emerging technology, but it is an extraordinarily successful one, now deeply embedded in everyday social and economic life. It has successively moved beyond the laptop into phones, games consoles, music players, televisions, and a suite of ‘smart home’ devices, from speakers to security cameras.
Like television, Wi-Fi has changed public and private spaces, from households to cafés, hospitals, and libraries. It has changed the way people work, travel, and entertain themselves, enabling the creation of new markets, new spin-off technologies, and new cultural practices. The Wi-Fi Alliance, the industry certifying body which controls the Wi-Fi trademark, estimates that, as of 2020, over 13 billion Wi-Fi devices are in use, and that 4 billion Wi-Fi devices were shipped in 2019 (Wi-Fi Alliance, 2020b). So, in the space of a few decades, the global population of Wi-Fi devices has grown to comfortably exceed the number of humans. The Alliance claims that Wi-Fi is the single most-used medium for global internet traffic, and contributes substantially to the world’s 3 trillion dollar mobile internet economy (2020b). One database of publicly accessible open access networks reports that there are now over 40 million free Wi-Fi hotspots globally, with almost half a million of these descendants of the public phone booth in Indonesia alone (Wiman, 2020). Growth at the global scale has also been spectacular at a domestic level. According to one market analysis, broadband-connected households in the United States in 2018 had an average of 9.1 Wi-Fi connected devices (Parks Associates, 2018).
Wi-Fi indeed seems to be everywhere, as those big numbers suggest. But if wireless broadband once appeared magical, there is a risk that for many of us it may now seem mundane. Wi-Fi predated the take-up of 3G mobile networks in the first decade of the new millennium: it offered the first accessible form of mobile broadband. Most people’s computing experiences are now both mobile and connected. We are familiar with both the convenience of Wi-Fi and its irritations: the glitchy slow-downs, the password problems, the scams, the patchy coverage, the surveillance, the highly restricted public networks, and the consequences of constant connection for work and social life. Cellular wireless services are now often faster – and sometimes much faster – than Wi-Fi. In many ways, Wi-Fi has both exceeded the expectations of its early advocates and disappointed them.
Figure 1.2 Internet everywhere: public Wi-Fi, Talinn, Estonia. Source: authors’ own.
Wi-Fi’s fundamental capability is that it enables shared, flexible, and relatively low-cost access to the internet, a valuable resource. This gives rise to a set of distinctive attributes, and these are at the heart of both the extraordinary successes of Wi-Fi and its failures. As we describe, Wi-Fi is an unusual form of network infrastructure, which augments and sometimes substitutes for other networks, while proving resistant to the power of both internet platforms and large service providers. In households, communities, and cities, Wi-Fi can work as a gap filler and a network extender. It does not rely on cutting-edge technologies or high-end processors, and Wi-Fi chips are produced in huge numbers, so the hardware is cheap. Its transmissions use the shared, publicly available spectrum, so users do not bear the costs of exclusive commercial spectrum licences. It is usually deployed on the edges of communication networks, within households and public spaces, by both end users and internet access companies. In telecommunications-speak, Wi-Fi is a ‘last mile’ technology, which can be provided, managed, and adapted by internet users themselves, whether these are families, institutions, or local communities. By the same token, the deployment of Wi-Fi doesn’t directly change underlying network infrastructures, such as the distribution or ownership of high-speed cables and switches. Nor does it change market structures, policies, or pricing models which substantially determine where and how people can connect. This means that Wi-Fi on its own is unlikely to bridge the digital divide or equalize the social distribution of digital resources. Despite the hopes of some its early advocates, Wi-Fi has not displaced commercial mobile networks. Nor has it created an open, internet commons.
For most users, Wi-Fi remains a cheap consumer ‘add-on’, with base stations often built into inexpensive internet access points provided by internet service providers. The low-cost model, a key reason for Wi-Fi’s success, probably also explains relative underinvestment in Wi-Fi compared to other wireless technologies. Newer modes of wireless connection, including the higher-speed cellular broadband services marketed as 5G, now promise higher speeds and greater security, alongside more lucrative returns for telecommunications firms, and a new upgrade cycle for smartphone manufacturers.
So why a book about Wi-Fi at this time? The experiences of 2020 underline some of the reasons why Wi-Fi matters, and is likely to matter more in the future, and why we need to understand it better than we do. When we think about how Wi-Fi has been used in the two emergencies, the bushfires and the pandemic, we can readily compare the responsive problem-solving demonstrated in the aftermath of the Australian fires with the adaptability of connected people and organizations during the pandemic. In both cases, Wi-Fi appears as a means for restoring capabilities which had been swept away, a means for managing exceptionally difficult circumstances. For those sheltering from the fires in remote townships, Wi-Fi was deployed in new ways to provide emergency support and relief for everyone with a device to connect. Reconnection was critically important for both stranded urban holiday-makers and the residents of small coastal towns, regardless of the considerable social and economic differences between these populations. Wi-Fi services in the wake of the bushfires were usually offered by telecommunications companies, which used Wi-Fi to stand in for damaged infrastructure. For those sheltering from the pandemic at home, Wi-Fi was also an essential digital resource – a means for continuity in work, education, entertainment, and social links. In the case of the pandemic, Wi-Fi was usually self-provided, in order to extend networks within households. In these circumstances, we have also seen sharply differentiated social consequences, a magnification of digital inequalities. For those without vital digital connections at home, the risk of exposure to the virus also increased, just as the absence of connectivity increased the risk of the fires.
This book shows how, in ways and circumstances other than catastrophes, Wi-Fi continues to provide vital connections. At the same time, Wi-Fi changes the way people connect with each other, media, and digital services. Internet scholars have written about how the internet ‘reconfigures access’ to resources (Dutton, 2005). Online news services, for example, may reinforce people’s interest in the news, by making news content more readily accessible; they can also change the kind of news people encounter, by presenting alternative sources of news. Wi-Fi invites us to consider how a flexible and affordable wireless medium may reconfigure access to the internet itself, both by making the internet more accessible across diverse physical and social locations, and by changing the ways in which people use it. The fact that Wi-Fi augments and extends networks
