Western Philosophy. Группа авторов
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу Western Philosophy - Группа авторов страница 89
But the question what ontology actually to adopt still stands open, and the obvious counsel is tolerance and an experimental spirit. Let us by all means see how much of the physicalistic conceptual scheme can be reduced to a phenomenalistic one; still, physics also naturally demands pursuing, irreducible in toto though it be. Let us see how, or to what degree, natural science may be rendered independent of platonistic mathematics; but let us also pursue mathematics and delve into its platonistic foundations.
From among the various conceptual schemes best suited to these various pursuits, one – the phenomenalistic – claims epistemological priority. Viewed from within the phenomenalistic conceptual scheme, the ontologies of physical objects and mathematical objects are myths. The quality of myth, however, is relative; relative, in this case, to the epistemological point of view. This point of view is one among various, corresponding to one among our various interests and purposes.
Specimen Questions
1 How does Quine propose to solve the ‘riddle of non-being’? How does his solution reflect a ‘taste for desert landscapes’?
2 How does Quine respond to the argument that fictional entities (like Pegasus the winged horse) must exist in some sense, or else we could not talk about them?
3 ‘Our ontology is determined once we have fixed upon the over-all conceptual scheme which is to accommodate science in the broadest sense’ (Quine). Explain and critically discuss.
Suggestions for Further Reading (Including Internet Resources)
1 Several of Quine’s most important philosophical papers are contained in his From a Logical Point of View (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1953; rev. edn 1961).
2 For an excellent study of Quine’s philosophy, see C. Hookway’s Quine: Language, Experience and Reality (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1988). Amongst the more recent publications is G. Kemp, Quine: A Guide for the Perplexed (New York: Continuum, 2006), which gives a clear explication of Quine’s central ideas. P. Hylton provides an excellent exposition of Quine’s views and the arguments supporting them in his Quine (London and New York: Routledge, 2007). See also P. Gregory, Quine’s Naturalism: Language, Knowledge and the Subject (New York: Continuum Press, 2008) for another illuminating account of Quine.
3 Two useful collections of critical essays are R. Barrett and R. Gibson (eds.), Perspectives on Quine (Oxford: Blackwell, 1990), and G. Harman and E. Lepore (eds.), A Companion to W.V.O. Quine (Wiley-Blackwell, 2014).
4 For online resources, the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy has a useful entry at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/quine/ (by P. Hylton and G. Kemp). On Quine’s philosophy of science, see the entry in The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy at https://www.iep.utm.edu/quine-sc/ (by R. Sinclair). Douglas Quine, son of W. V. O. Quine, also maintains a site at http://www.wvquine.org/ dedicated to the work of his father. It includes bibliographical information, lists of books on Quine, and much else.
Notes
* First published as an article in the Review of Metaphysics (1948), repr. in W. V. O. Quine, From a Logical Point of View (New York: Harper & Row, 1953; 2nd edn 1961); excerpts from pp. 1–2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19.
1 1 See introduction to Part III, extract 3, below.
2 2 See Part III, extract 9, below.
Конец ознакомительного фрагмента.
Текст предоставлен ООО «ЛитРес».
Прочитайте эту книгу целиком, купив полную легальную версию на ЛитРес.
Безопасно оплатить книгу можно банковской картой Visa, MasterCard, Maestro, со счета мобильного телефона, с платежного терминала, в салоне МТС или Связной, через PayPal, WebMoney, Яндекс.Деньги, QIWI Кошелек, бонусными картами или другим удобным Вам способом.