Forest Ecology. Dan Binkley

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Forest Ecology - Dan Binkley страница 18

Автор:
Жанр:
Серия:
Издательство:
Forest Ecology - Dan Binkley

Скачать книгу

      Over the course of the growing season, the tulip poplar may produce 50 kg of sugar. Respiration would consume half, and the growth of short‐lived roots and leaves might consume another quarter. Less than 25% of the annual production from the tree's leaves would be found in new stem wood, increasing the diameter and height of the tree. The annual growth of the tree might use more than 8000 liters of water.

      Dry periods during the summer lower the rate of photosynthesis in two ways. Low supplies of water in the soil lead to closure of leaf stomata, restricting both the gain of CO2 and the loss of water. The tulip poplar might also respond directly to the dryness of the atmosphere, and days with very high vapor pressure deficits may have low rates of photosynthesis, even if the soil is moist.

Schematic illustration of seasonal trends in incoming sunlight (A) lead to almost twofold differences between summer and winter. The difference might be larger if not for the frequent cloud cover in summer. Patterns in incoming light lead to both daily and seasonal patterns in air temperatures (B). These environmental driving forces combine with the biology of the tulip poplar to determine the seasonal course of water use by the tree (C).

      Source: Data from Chelcy Miniat.

Graph depicts the growth of yellow poplar trees is low in drier summers, and increases with increasing summer moisture.

      Source: Data from Kardol et al. 2010.

      A tulip poplar stem may not be the “first generation” of the “tree.” A tree stem may die (from a wind storm breaking the stem, or a saw harvesting the tree), and a new stem may develop from dormant buds in the stump. The early growth and development of sprouted stems is faster and more assured than the tenuous development of a new seedling.

      The tree is larger than its local neighbors, and this “dominance” provides a twofold advantage. The tree obtains a higher supply of light, water, and nutrients than its neighbors, driving faster growth. Faster growth then leads to a positive feedback that increases the tree's capture of resources, allowing its growth to increase at the expense of neighbors.

Photo depicts the dominant tulip poplar tree in the center of this springtime photo is part of a complex ecological system that includes other tulip poplars, other trees from more than a dozen species, several dozen species of understory plants, hundreds of species of arthropods and other invertebrates, and a soil that is itself a complex system with a level of biodiversity that dwarfs the diversity of the rest of the forest.

      Does the tree benefit from neighbors, or is competition for resources the major effect of neighbors? Competition between trees is very important in all forests, but some possibilities exist for interactions between trees that actually benefit neighbors. One example is having a nitrogen‐fixing black locust tree as a neighbor. The tulip poplar would compete with the locust for light, water, and other nutrients, but it might benefit from the enrichment of the soil N supply by the locust. Dozens of species of plants in the understory also compete with overstory trees for soil water and nutrients.

Schematic illustration of a topographic map of the Coweeta Basin represent the amount of water available for use by trees, and for draining into streams. Higher elevations receive more rainfall (and snow) than lower elevations, but water also flows downslope through soils, enriching lower parts of landscapes.

Скачать книгу