Manual of Laboratory Testing Methods for Dental Restorative Materials. Paromita Mazumdar

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Manual of Laboratory Testing Methods for Dental Restorative Materials - Paromita Mazumdar страница 10

Manual of Laboratory Testing Methods for Dental Restorative Materials - Paromita Mazumdar

Скачать книгу

for small elongated areas (as shown in Figures 1.121.14).

Schematic illustration of brinell hardness testing. Schematic illustration of rockwell hardness testing.

      Source: Vieira [4]. Licensed under CC BY 4.0.

       Good to Know

      All materials require different hardness testing. The specificity of a hardness tester is dependent on the following factors:

      1 Material of the indenter

      2 Shape and size of the indenter and the sample to be tested.

      3 Loading parameter (amount of force it can apply)

      Hardness tests are extremely used and have important applicability on Dentistry. Hardness test can evaluate the degree of mineralization of a dental substrate for example. A specific force applied for a specific time and distance provides important data in studies assessing the ability of enamel and dentin remineralization after different treatments as happens in unbalanced situations of des‐remineralization. Another important use of this test is to evaluate the degree of polymerization of resin composite and resin cements.

Schematic illustration of stress–strain curve for assessment of Young's modulus.

      The modulus of elasticity, or measure of a material's stiffness, is also important in relation to anticipated longevity of a restoration. An elastic material (one with a low elastic modulus) will deform when a load is placed on it but will return to its original shape once the load falls below the elastic limit of the material. As a general rule, restorative materials need to be very stiff (high elastic modulus), so that under load the elastic deformation will be very small. An exception to this is in the Class V situation. Micro‐filled composite materials have a lower modulus of elasticity than hybrid composite materials; this may be why micro‐filled materials show higher retention rates in Class V cavities, given that they deform more readily as the tooth deforms at the cervical area under occlusal loading.

      The fracture toughness was then calculated by:

      (1.2)equation

      The variables are defined as: Kic is the stress intensity factor, P is the load at fracture, L is the span, distance between the supports, w is the width of the specimen, b is the thickness of the specimen, and a is the crack length.

      Good to Know

      Cross‐head speed is also known as deformation rate. It is measured in mm/min. Every material has different average cross‐head speeds recommended by ISO 4049. For e.g. resin‐based composites have a speed of (0.75 ± 0.25 mm/min).

      With nanoscience gaining popularity, nanoindenters have advantages over traditional mechanical testing by providing both elastic modulus and hardness data of the tested samples. Nanoindentation is conducted with a calibrated Berkovich diamond indenter tip. A Berkovich tip is a three‐sided pyramidal indenter.

      During the nanoindentation process, a calibrated indenter tip approaches the surface of the sample. The force–displacement data is used to determine the point of contact. After the sample is contacted, the force is linearly increased and the tip indents into the surface of the sample. A short dwell time occurs at the maximum force and then the sample is unloaded. At the initial point of unloading, the stiffness is measured.

      Longevity of a restoration is predicted to some extent by its adhesive ability, and this in turn can be measured by bond strength testing. An ideal bond strength test should be accurate, clinically reliable and less technique‐sensitive. It should involve the use

Скачать книгу