years old, consider testicular torsion, Henoch‐Schonlein purpura (HSP), intussusception, and appendicitis. Older children between 5 years and adolescence can have inflammatory bowel disease, testicular torsion, HSP, and pharyngitis. This is not an all‐encompassing list, but more of a differential diagnosis with which to start when obtaining the history.
On initial presentation, it may be difficult for EMS clinicians to distinguish a benign condition in children from a true surgical emergency. Up to one third of pediatric patients admitted to the ED fail to have diagnoses at the time of discharge, and a significant number of ED discharge diagnoses may be incorrect [41, 42]. Extrapolating such information to prehospital conditions makes it apparent that there should be a low threshold for transporting pediatric patients with abdominal pain.
Immunocompromised
Many patients are considered relatively immunocompromised due to their underlying medical conditions. Examples include the elderly, cancer patients undergoing treatment, malnourished patients, diabetics, patients with end‐stage renal disease, patients on certain medications (e.g., chronic steroids and many medications for diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and irritable bowel disease), and those with HIV infection but adequate CD4 counts. As a result of their underlying conditions, these patients have depressed inflammatory responses and tend to present later in their illness courses.
Of greater concern are patients who are more profoundly immunocompromised, many times based on treatments they receive for their underlying conditions. Examples include AIDS patients with low CD4 counts, transplant patients on chronic immunosuppressive medications, leukopenic cancer patients on chemotherapy, and patients with other conditions requiring immune modulating medications such as inflammatory bowel disease or rheumatoid arthritis. These patients present with an expanded list of serious conditions that may manifest as abdominal complaints, including neutropenic enterocolitis, graft‐versus‐host disease, cytomegalovirus‐related perforation, and tuberculous peritonitis [43]. Important questions to ask include history of fevers, vomiting and/or diarrhea, recent changes in medication regimen (including noncompliance due to financial or other logistical barriers), and any prior similar episodes. Transplant patients should have the date and location of their surgery noted. EMS protocols or direct medical oversight should provide the option for such patients to be transported to specialty centers capable of managing their potentially complex conditions when feasible. Because immunocompromised patients present late in their courses, their mortality tends to be high.
Obesity and bariatric surgery patients
Statistics from 2018 estimate that 42.4% of U.S. adults are obese, a condition with known links to increased rates of diabetes and heart disease [44]. Obesity may also be linked to an increase in abdominal complaints including dyspepsia, irritable bowel syndrome, and constipation, as well as abdominal wall hernias that predispose patients to bowel obstructions [45]. The care of the obese patient may be hindered by an unreliable physical exam and equipment that is not suited for the patient’s size.
Not surprisingly, the rate of bariatric surgery has increased dramatically in recent years. Two thirds of these patients will seek medical care, with 29% getting hospitalized, representing a 4‐ to 5‐fold increased likelihood of admission in this population [46]. It is important to understand and recognize complications that include ulceration and bleeding, perforation, and mechanical obstruction. It is imperative that EMS clinicians be aware of the increased rate of these conditions in this patient population.
Summary
Patients with abdominal pain can present a significant challenge to EMS clinicians. An approach that emphasizes immediate consideration of life‐threatening abdominal and extra‐abdominal conditions is imperative. The patient’s history and the location of the pain are the primary determinants of the differential diagnosis. Stabilization of ABCs and restoring hemodynamic stability remain the primary focus of patient management. Controversies in the use of pain medication in patients with abdominal pain and appropriate fluid resuscitation in the face of acute hemorrhage exist. Specific attention to high‐risk populations, including the elderly, women of reproductive age, children, immunocompromised, and bariatric patients, must be exercised.
References
1 1 CDC. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2017 Emergency Department Summary Tables. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhamcs/web_tables/2017_ed_web_tables‐508.pdf. Accessed July 16, 2020.
2 2 Pointer JE, Harlan K. Impact of liberalization of protocols for the use of morphine sulfate in an urban emergency medical services system. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2005; 9: 377–1.
3 3 Lewis LM, Banet GA, Blanda M, Hustey FM, Meldon SW, Gerson LW. Etiology and clinical course of abdominal pain in senior patients: a prospective, multicenter study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005; 60:1071–6.
4 4 Zielinski MD, Stubbs JR, Berns KS, et al. Prehospital blood transfusion programs: capabilities and lessons learned. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017; 82(Suppl 1):S70–S78.
5 5 Shand S, Curtis K, Dinh M, Burns B. What is the impact of prehospital blood product administration for patients with catastrophic haemorrhage: an integrative review. Injury. 2019; 50:226–34.
6 6 Nelson BP, Chason K. Use of ultrasound by emergency medical services: a review. Int J Emerg Med. 2008; 1: 253–9.
7 7 Heegaard W, Hildebrandt D, Spear D, Chason K, Nelson B, Ho J. Prehospital ultrasound by paramedics: results of field trial. Acad Emerg Med. 2010; 17:624–30.
8 8 McCallum J, Vu E, Sweet D, Kanji HD. Assessment of paramedic ultrasound curricula: a systematic review. Air Med J. 2015; 34:360–8.
9 9 Jansen TC, van Bommel J, Mulder PG, Rommes JH, Schieveld SJ, Bakker J. The prognostic value of blood lactate levels relative to that of vital signs in the pre‐hospital setting: a pilot study. Crit Care. 2008; 12:R160.
10 10 van Beest PA, Mulder PJ, Oetomo SB, van den Broek B, Kuiper MA, Spronk PE. Measurement of lactate in a prehospital setting is related to outcome. Eur J Emerg Med. 2009; 16:318–22.
11 11 Tobias AZ, Guyette FX, Seymour CW, et al. Pre‐resuscitation lactate and hospital mortality in prehospital patients. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014; 18:321–7.
12 12 Cope Z. The Early Diagnosis of the Acute Abdomen. New York: Oxford University Press, 1921.
13 13 Nissman SA, Kaplan LJ, Mann BD. Critically reappraising the literature driven practice of analgesia administration for acute abdominal pain in the emergency room prior to surgical evaluation. Am J Surg. 2003; 185:291–6.
14 14 Thomas SH, Silen W. Effect on diagnostic efficiency of analgesia for undifferentiated abdominal pain. Br J Surg. 2003; 90:5–9.
15 15 Lee JS, Stiell IG, Wells GA, et al. Adverse outcomes and opioid analgesic administration in acute abdominal pain. Acad Emerg Med. 2008; 7:980–7.
16 16 Rosen MP, Sands DZ, Longmaid HE, et al. Impact of abdominal CT on the management of patients presenting to the emergency department with acute abdominal pain. Am J Roentgenol. 2000; 174:1391–6.
17 17 Gavriilidis P, de’Angelis N, Tobias A. To use or not to use opioid analgesia for acute abdominal pain before definitive surgical diagnosis? A systematic review and network meta‐analysis. J Clin Med Res. 2019; 11:121–6.
18 18
