Emergency Medical Services. Группа авторов

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Emergency Medical Services - Группа авторов страница 98

Emergency Medical Services - Группа авторов

Скачать книгу

JP, et al. Use of emergency medical services in acute myocardial infarction and subsequent quality of care: observations from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2. Circulation. 2002; 106:3018–23.

      4 4 Brainard AH, Raynovich W, Tandberg D, Bedrick EJ. The prehospital 12‐lead electrocardiogram's effect on time to initiation of reperfusion therapy: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of existing literature. Am J Emerg Med. 2005; 23:351–6.

      5 5 Jollis JG, Al‐Khalidi HR, Monk L, et al. Expansion of a regional ST‐segment‐elevation myocardial infarction system to an entire state. Circulation. 2012; 126:189–95.

      6 6 Jollis JG, Al‐Khalidi HR, Roettig ML, et al. Impact of regionalization of ST‐segment‐elevation myocardial infarction care on treatment times and outcomes for emergency medical services‐transported patients presenting to hospitals with percutaneous coronary intervention: mission: lifeline accelerator‐2. Circulation. 2018; 137:376–87.

      7 7 Jollis JG, Roettig ML, Aluko AO, et al. Implementation of a statewide system for coronary reperfusion for ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2007; 298:2371–80.

      8 8 Kohn MA, Kwan E, Gupta M, Tabas JA. Prevalence of acute myocardial infarction and other serious diagnoses in patients presenting to an urban emergency department with chest pain. J Emerg Med. 2005; 29:383–90.

      9 9 Goodacre S, Locker T, Morris F, Campbell S. How useful are clinical features in the diagnosis of acute, undifferentiated chest pain? Acad Emerg Med. 2002; 9:203–8.

      10 10 Goodacre SW, Angelini K, Arnold J, Revill S, Morris F. Clinical predictors of acute coronary syndromes in patients with undifferentiated chest pain. QJM. 2003; 96:893–8.

      11 11 Marsan RJ Jr., Shaver KJ, Sease KL, Shofer FS, Sites FD, Hollander JE. Evaluation of a clinical decision rule for young adult patients with chest pain. Acad Emerg Med. 2005; 12:26–31.

      12 12 Deakin CD, Sherwood DM, Smith A, Cassidy M. Does telephone triage of emergency (999) calls using Advanced Medical Priority Dispatch (AMPDS) with Department of Health (DH) call prioritisation effectively identify patients with an acute coronary syndrome? An audit of 42,657 emergency calls to Hampshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust. Emerg Med J. 2006; 23:232–5.

      13 13 Ramanujam P, Guluma KZ, Castillo EM, et al. Accuracy of stroke recognition by emergency medical dispatchers and paramedics–San Diego experience. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2008; 12:307–13.

      14 14 Clawson JJ, Gardett I, Scott G, et al. Hospital‐confirmed acute myocardial infarction: prehospital identification using the medical priority dispatch system. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018; 33:29–35.

      15 15 O'Connor RE, Brady W, Brooks SC,et al. Part 10: acute coronary syndromes: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2010; 122(Suppl 3):S787–817.

      16 16 O'Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST‐elevation myocardial infarction: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 61:485–510.

      17 17 Eisenberg MJ, Topal EJ. Prehospital administration of aspirin in patients with unstable angina and acute myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med. 1996; 156:1506–10.

      18 18 Kudenchuk PJ, Maynard C, Cobb LA, et al. Utility of the prehospital electrocardiogram in diagnosing acute coronary syndromes: the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention (MITI) Project. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998; 32:17–27.

      19 19 Morrison LJ, Brooks S, Sawadsky B, McDonald A, Verbeek PR. Prehospital 12‐lead electrocardiography impact on acute myocardial infarction treatment times and mortality: a systematic review. Acad Emerg Med. 2006; 13:84–9.

      20 20 Massel D, Dawdy JA, Melendez LJ. Strict reliance on a computer algorithm or measurable ST segment criteria may lead to errors in thrombolytic therapy eligibility. Am Heart J. 2000; 140:221–6.

      21 21 Swor R, Hegerberg S, McHugh‐McNally A, Goldstein M, McEachin CC. Prehospital 12‐lead ECG: efficacy or effectiveness? Prehosp Emerg Care. 2006; 10:374–7.

      22 22 Berger JS, Eisen L, Nozad V, et al. Competency in electrocardiogram interpretation among internal medicine and emergency medicine residents. Am J Med. 2005; 118:873–80.

      23 23 Whitbread M, Leah V, Bell T, Coats TJ. Recognition of ST elevation by paramedics. Emerg Med J. 2002; 19:66–7.

      24 24 Feldman JA, Brinsfield K, Bernard S, White D, Maciejko T. Real‐time paramedic compared with blinded physician identification of ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction: results of an observational study. Am J Emerg Med. 2005; 23:443–8.

      25 25 Davis DP, Graydon C, Stein R, et al. The positive predictive value of paramedic versus emergency physician interpretation of the prehospital 12‐lead electrocardiogram. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2007; 11:399–402.

      26 26 Kontos MC, Gunderson MR, Zegre‐Hemsey JK, et al. Prehospital activation of hospital resources (preact) ST‐segment‐elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI): a standardized approach to prehospital activation and direct to the catheterization laboratory for STEMI recommendations from the American Heart Association's mission: Lifeline Program. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020; 9:e011963.

      27 27 Wang K, Asinger RW, Marriott HJ. ST‐segment elevation in conditions other than acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349:2128–35.

      28 28 Stub D, Smith K, Bernard S, et al. Air versus oxygen in ST‐segment‐elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2015; 131:2143–50.

      29 29 ISIS‐2 investigators. Randomised trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS‐2. ISIS‐2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group. Lancet. 1988; 2:349–60.

      30 30 Quan D, LoVecchio F, Clark B, Gallagher JV, 3rd. Prehospital use of aspirin rarely is associated with adverse events. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2004; 19:362–5.

      31 31 Barbash I, Freimark D, Gottlieb S, et al. Outcome of myocardial infarction in patients treated with aspirin is enhanced by pre‐hospital administration. Cardiology. 2002; 98:141–7.

      32 32 Freimark D, Matetzky S, Leor J, et al. Timing of aspirin administration as a determinant of survival of patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolysis. Am J Cardiol. 2002; 89:381–5.

      33 33 Lewis JF, Zeger SL, Li X, et al. Gender differences in the quality of EMS care nationwide for chest pain and out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest. Womens Health Issues. 2019; 29:116–24.

      34 34 Tataris KL, Mercer MP, Govindarajan P. Prehospital aspirin administration for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the USA: an EMS quality assessment using the NEMSIS 2011 database. Emerg Med J. 2015; 32:876–81.

      35 35 GISSI‐3 Investigators. GISSI‐3: effects of lisinopril and transdermal glyceryl trinitrate singly and together on 6‐week mortality and ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'infarto Miocardico. Lancet. 1994; 343:1115–22.

      36 36 Henrikson CA, Howell EE, Bush DE, et al. Chest pain relief by nitroglycerin does not predict active coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med. 2003; 139:979–86.

      37 37 Robichaud L, Ross D, Proulx MH, et al. Prehospital nitroglycerin safety in inferior ST elevation myocardial infarction. Prehosp

Скачать книгу