Autonomy: The Quest to Build the Driverless Car - And How It Will Reshape Our World. Lawrence Burns

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Autonomy: The Quest to Build the Driverless Car - And How It Will Reshape Our World - Lawrence Burns страница 14

Autonomy: The Quest to Build the Driverless Car - And How It Will Reshape Our World - Lawrence Burns

Скачать книгу

the step was designed to smooth relations between team software lead Kevin Peterson and project manager Chris Urmson, who were apt to butt heads in the latter half of Sandstorm’s development. There was talk of giving each deputy his own vehicle, although years later Whittaker would insist that Peterson and Urmson contributed to both robots in the lead-up to the second race. And partially, the move was pragmatic. After all, thanks to AM General’s donation, Red Team had enough Humvees.

      The second vehicle, which became known as H1ghlander, was a 1999 model year, making it thirteen years younger than Sandstorm. The AM General–donated vehicle came with a 6.5-liter turbocharged engine. One of the challenges of autonomous driving involved controlling acceleration and steering. Most vehicles of the era were mechanically controlled. They relied on a human being twisting steering wheels, pushing accelerators, shifting gears, which complicated matters when a computer was supposed to do the driving. There was a margin of error when a digitally controlled actuator pressed against, say, a gas pedal.

      This new Humvee, H1ghlander, featured drive-by-wire capability embedded in its controls. It had been designed to be controlled by a computer. The throttle, for example, was operated by a factory-installed engine control module. So instead of rigging up an electric motor and lever to actually push against the gas pedal, as with Sandstorm, the H1ghlander crew could hack into the newer Humvee’s computer system and control the throttle electronically. It all meant less margin of error, which made H1ghlander a better driver.

      Another change was that Whittaker and his students had tracked down a different, more accurate location-tracking system. The system used in the first race had a margin of error of about a yard. This new one, from a sponsor named Applanix, featured a margin of error of about twenty-five centimeters, or less than a foot—a big improvement for the second race.

      So the Red Team had a lot going for it. But so, too, did Thrun’s team. In his heart, Whittaker was a hardware guy, who came from an era when making robots work involved the precise interplay between actuators and carburetors, electric motors and solar-powered chargers. This was reflected in Red Team’s approach to the first challenge, which saw his charges spending as much time perfecting the e-box and gimbal mechanisms as writing code for the computers. But as computing power improved, robotics was increasingly becoming a software problem, which computer scientists, rather than mechanical engineers, had to solve. Whittaker was an engineer. Thrun’s team was dominated by computer scientists. Very little of the hardware that Stanford used needed to be custom-designed. In contrast to Sandstorm’s gimbal and e-box, which the Carnegie Mellon team had engineered itself, Thrun simply took sensors he found in the marketplace and bolted them to his team’s vehicle, including five LIDAR units, a color camera to aid road detection and two radar sensors designed to identify large obstacles at long distances. The philosophy of the Stanford team was to “treat autonomous navigation as a software problem.”

      “My perspective was, you take a human out of a car, and replace it with a robot—there’s a bit of a hardware issue,” Thrun observes. “You have to figure out how to crank the steering wheel and press the brake. But that part is trivial. You put a little motor on the steering wheel. There’s no science … It’s all about artificial intelligence. About making the right decision. So we had this complete focus on making the system smart.”

      “Carnegie Mellon was a team—it’s a humongous place, and they have experts in everything,” Montemerlo explains. “We were a much smaller group. We very much were software people. None of us had any mechanical skill whatsoever.”

      That said, Thrun had learned a lot from his experiences working for Whittaker. In September of 2004, fresh off the heels of Montemerlo’s presentation, Thrun used Whittaker’s template to begin work on his own entry in the second DARPA Grand Challenge. Just as Whittaker did, Thrun recruited volunteers by asking them to enroll in a university class. Thrun’s was called “Projects in Artificial Intelligence.” At the first meeting of maybe forty students Thrun gave a Red Whittaker–style inspirational speech. “Look, there’s no syllabus, no course outline, no lectures,” Thrun recalls saying. “All we’re going to do is build a robot. A robot car that can drive on the original course.”

      Thinking of the way Whittaker motivated his students to work hard by providing them with challenges, Thrun set his class a clear and well-defined objective: By the end of the two-month-long session, they were to have built a car that could travel a single mile of the first DARPA Grand Challenge course. “Red and I have very different personalities,” Thrun says. “But I tried to learn from him. And what I learned from Red was, when you give students a goal, no matter how hard it is, because they haven’t learned that these goals are hard to reach, these students think they can reach it. And eventually, they do reach the goal.”

      The class didn’t have a budget to go out and buy a car. Someone contacted Ford to ask the manufacturer to donate one, and the company said yes, but they wanted it back afterward, in the same condition they lent it out. Perhaps thinking of Urmson’s rollover accident, Thrun declined the Ford offer. Luckily, a friend of his named Joseph O’Sullivan, an AI researcher who worked for Google, played soccer with a guy, Cedric Dupont, who worked as an engineer at Volkswagen’s lab in Palo Alto. Dupont arranged to provide Thrun’s team with a 2004 Touareg R5 TDI, as well as the help of VW engineers to access its computer system. “That was like a gift from God,” Thrun says. Like H1ghlander, the Touareg had a drive-by-wire interface, and with VW’s help, Thrun’s team could hack into the computer system relatively easily.

      Thrun ended up with about twenty people committed to joining the Stanford team, which he split into smaller units. One group was charged with configuring hardware—actually attaching the sensors to the Toureg, which, in a nod to their school, they gave the nickname Stanley. Another part of the team was in charge of providing the mapping. A third handled navigation.

      Two months later, at the end of the term, Thrun took his students out to the Mojave Desert and set up Stanley on the course of the first Grand Challenge. Then they activated the robot and watched: Stanley drove past the class’s one-mile goal, thrilling Thrun, who became even more excited when Stanley passed 7.3 miles, which was how far Carnegie Mellon’s Sandstorm had made it. Some minutes later, at 8.4 miles, Stanley found itself stuck in a deep rut, caused by heavy rain.

      Thrun was beside himself. The sort of rut that had stymied his robot would have been smoothed over by DARPA prior to the race. Had this been an official race day, it’s possible Stanley would have proceeded much farther. “That was just unbelievable,” Thrun recalls. “That was the moment it became clear to me, boy, there’s a real possibility it can be done.” If a team of comparative novices could surpass the best Carnegie Mellon team in just two months, Thrun wondered, then what could the same team do in the year leading up to the second race?

      Red Team’s strategy this time around amounted to a bigger and better version of the approach they’d intended to execute in the first race.

      Truth be told, they felt a little cheated by the way the first race went. The communication out of DARPA had led the team to believe that the robots would have to navigate rough territory and brutal off-road conditions. DARPA’s actual route turned out to have some hairy spots, such as tunnels and narrow fence gates. But there was nothing arduous about the road itself. That had been a smoothly graded desert thoroughfare. Your typical subcompact import could have driven off a car lot and navigated it. Looking back, Red Team had wasted countless hours ensuring their robot would be able to handle off-road conditions. And not just handle them—handle them fast. That’s why they’d used shocks and springs to suspend the electronics box and the gimbal, to ensure the computer equipment would be able to withstand the resulting jars and vibrations. Had Red Team forgotten about testing the robot in the most difficult of conditions, and just concentrated on developing a vehicle that would be able to roll from one GPS waypoint to another, then many

Скачать книгу