Score
95. What are the record-keeping requirements of Information technology in healthcare activities?
<--- Score
96. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
97. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
98. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
99. What gets examined?
<--- Score
100. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
101. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
102. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Information technology in healthcare? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
103. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
104. What are the core elements of the Information technology in healthcare business case?
<--- Score
105. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
106. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
107. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
108. Are the Information technology in healthcare requirements testable?
<--- Score
109. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
110. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
111. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
112. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
113. How did the Information technology in healthcare manager receive input to the development of a Information technology in healthcare improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
114. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
115. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
116. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
117. What is the scope of the Information technology in healthcare effort?
<--- Score
118. Has the Information technology in healthcare work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
119. How do you catch Information technology in healthcare definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
120. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
121. Has a Information technology in healthcare requirement not been met?
<--- Score
122. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Information technology in healthcare work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
123. When is/was the Information technology in healthcare start date?
<--- Score
124. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
125. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
126. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
127. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
128. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
129. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
130. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
131. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
132. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
133. Is special Information technology in healthcare user knowledge required?
<--- Score
134. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score
