Executing Process Group: Document Processing215
3.1 Team Member Status Report: Document Processing217
3.2 Change Request: Document Processing219
3.3 Change Log: Document Processing221
3.4 Decision Log: Document Processing223
3.5 Quality Audit: Document Processing225
3.6 Team Directory: Document Processing228
3.7 Team Operating Agreement: Document Processing230
3.8 Team Performance Assessment: Document Processing232
3.9 Team Member Performance Assessment: Document Processing234
3.10 Issue Log: Document Processing236
4.0 Monitoring and Controlling Process Group: Document Processing238
4.1 Project Performance Report: Document Processing240
4.2 Variance Analysis: Document Processing242
4.3 Earned Value Status: Document Processing244
4.4 Risk Audit: Document Processing246
4.5 Contractor Status Report: Document Processing248
4.6 Formal Acceptance: Document Processing250
5.0 Closing Process Group: Document Processing252
5.1 Procurement Audit: Document Processing254
5.2 Contract Close-Out: Document Processing256
5.3 Project or Phase Close-Out: Document Processing258
5.4 Lessons Learned: Document Processing260
Index262
CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE
INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. To what extent would your organization benefit from being recognized as a award recipient?
<--- Score
2. Are employees recognized for desired behaviors?
<--- Score
3. What activities does the governance board need to consider?
<--- Score
4. Are problem definition and motivation clearly presented?
<--- Score
5. Are your goals realistic? Do you need to redefine your problem? Perhaps the problem has changed or maybe you have reached your goal and need to set a new one?
<--- Score
6. Why is this needed?
<--- Score
7. How do you recognize an objection?
<--- Score
8. What is the problem and/or vulnerability?
<--- Score
9. Do you have/need 24-hour access to key personnel?
<--- Score
10. What needs to stay?
<--- Score
11. What vendors make products that address the Document processing needs?
<--- Score
12. What are the minority interests and what amount of minority interests can be recognized?
<--- Score
13. Which information does the Document processing business case need to include?
<--- Score
14. What does Document processing success mean to the stakeholders?
<--- Score
15. How many trainings, in total, are needed?
<--- Score
16. What else needs to be measured?
<--- Score
17. What extra resources will you need?
<--- Score
18. Which issues are too important to ignore?
<--- Score
19. Have you identified your Document processing key performance indicators?
<--- Score
20. Will a response program recognize when a crisis occurs and provide some level of response?
<--- Score
21. Would you recognize a threat from the inside?
<--- Score
22. Are controls defined to recognize and contain problems?
<--- Score
23. As a sponsor, customer or management, how important is it to meet goals, objectives?
<--- Score
24. What Document processing problem should be solved?
<--- Score
25. Is the quality assurance team identified?
<--- Score
26. Do you need to avoid or amend any Document processing activities?
<--- Score
27. What are the timeframes required to resolve each of the issues/problems?
<--- Score
28. How are you going to measure success?
<--- Score
29. Are there recognized Document processing problems?
<---
