What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Automotive Safety Integrity Level brings?
<--- Score
15. What are the Automotive Safety Integrity Level tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
16. Is special Automotive Safety Integrity Level user knowledge required?
<--- Score
17. What happens if Automotive Safety Integrity Level’s scope changes?
<--- Score
18. How to reconcile seemingly conflicting requirements of safety and efficiency?
<--- Score
19. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
20. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
21. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
22. Will a Automotive Safety Integrity Level production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
23. Have all basic functions of Automotive Safety Integrity Level been defined?
<--- Score
24. What would be the goal or target for a Automotive Safety Integrity Level’s improvement team?
<--- Score
25. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
26. Why is the minimum distance (safety distance) required and which factors play a role here?
<--- Score
27. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
28. Who has to be charged as responsible in case of an accident?
<--- Score
29. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
30. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
31. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
32. When is/was the Automotive Safety Integrity Level start date?
<--- Score
33. Is Automotive Safety Integrity Level linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
34. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
35. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Automotive Safety Integrity Level?
<--- Score
36. What are (control) requirements for Automotive Safety Integrity Level Information?
<--- Score
37. How do you manage changes in Automotive Safety Integrity Level requirements?
<--- Score
38. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
39. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
40. Why are you doing Automotive Safety Integrity Level and what is the scope?
<--- Score
41. What are the core elements of the Automotive Safety Integrity Level business case?
<--- Score
42. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
43. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
44. Are accountability and ownership for Automotive Safety Integrity Level clearly defined?
<--- Score
45. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
46. Is it true that the safety case regulatory approach leads to self-regulation by industry?
<--- Score
47. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
48. Is Automotive Safety Integrity Level currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
49. How are consistent Automotive Safety Integrity Level definitions important?
<--- Score
50. Is the scope of Automotive Safety Integrity Level defined?
<--- Score
51. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
52. How do you hand over Automotive Safety Integrity Level context?
<--- Score
53. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
54. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
55. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
56. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
57. How do you gather Automotive
