Score
101. Has the Automotive Safety Integrity Level work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
102. Does system satisfy technical system safety requirements?
<--- Score
103. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
104. Is there a clear Automotive Safety Integrity Level case definition?
<--- Score
105. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Automotive Safety Integrity Level results are met?
<--- Score
106. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
107. Is there a Automotive Safety Integrity Level management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
108. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
109. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
110. How does the Automotive Safety Integrity Level manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
111. What sources do you use to gather information for a Automotive Safety Integrity Level study?
<--- Score
112. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
113. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Automotive Safety Integrity Level? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
114. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
115. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
116. Can the software tool malfunction that it introduces or fails to detect errors of safety requirements?
<--- Score
117. What are the Automotive Safety Integrity Level use cases?
<--- Score
118. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
119. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
120. How will the Automotive Safety Integrity Level team and the group measure complete success of Automotive Safety Integrity Level?
<--- Score
121. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
122. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
123. What are the record-keeping requirements of Automotive Safety Integrity Level activities?
<--- Score
124. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
125. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
126. Are the Automotive Safety Integrity Level requirements testable?
<--- Score
127. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
128. Is Automotive Safety Integrity Level required?
<--- Score
129. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
130. Is there a critical path to deliver Automotive Safety Integrity Level results?
<--- Score
131. Is there any additional Automotive Safety Integrity Level definition of success?
<--- Score
132. What is in scope?
<--- Score
133. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
134. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
135. How can the value of Automotive Safety Integrity Level be defined?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Automotive Safety Integrity Level Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Where can you go to verify the info?
<--- Score
2. How is performance
