members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
95. Are the Virtual reality in healthcare requirements testable?
<--- Score
96. What is in scope?
<--- Score
97. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
98. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
99. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Virtual reality in healthcare leverage and how?
<--- Score
100. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
101. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
102. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
103. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
104. How would you define Virtual reality in healthcare leadership?
<--- Score
105. What are the Virtual reality in healthcare tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
106. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
107. How do you catch Virtual reality in healthcare definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
108. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
109. How does the Virtual reality in healthcare manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
110. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
111. Is there a clear Virtual reality in healthcare case definition?
<--- Score
112. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
113. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
114. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
115. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
116. What sources do you use to gather information for a Virtual reality in healthcare study?
<--- Score
117. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
118. How can the value of Virtual reality in healthcare be defined?
<--- Score
119. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
120. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
121. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
122. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
123. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
124. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
125. How do you gather Virtual reality in healthcare requirements?
<--- Score
126. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
127. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
128. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
129. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
130. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Virtual reality in healthcare Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What are hidden Virtual reality in healthcare quality costs?
<--- Score
2. Do you effectively measure and reward individual and team performance?
<--- Score
3. What causes extra work or rework?
<---
