—George Santayana, The Life of Reason: Human Understanding
“The future is forever a projection of the present.”
—Kōbō Abe, Inter Ice Age 4
“some like to imagine
a cosmic mother watching through a spray of stars”
—Tracy K. Smith, Life on Mars
“To administer the laws of apartheid, the bureaucracy grew enormously. By 1977, about 540,000 Whites were employed in the public sector […] and Afrikaners occupied more than 90 percent of the top positions. The vast majority of the white bureaucrats were ardent supporters of apartheid. Most of the black bureaucrats, numbering around 820,000, were reliable servants of the regime on which they depended for their livelihood.”
—Leonard Thompson, A History of South Africa
FOREWORD
I am a woman acting of her own will and desire. Do not attempt to contact me after this communication. In all likelihood, I am no longer here.
These lines mark the beginning of the note my colleague Dr Joseph Hessler presented me with three years ago, along with the other materials I was tasked to compile into a dossier meant to inform a State Defense Report. I didn’t. Instead, they became the following manuscript, which, with the now late Dr Hessler’s assistance, I have prepared for the public as TRIANGULUM.
At the time of writing, the sender of these materials remains unknown. We have at our disposal the note, as well as a cover letter, detailing further instructions. Then the materials themselves: a written record in the form of a memoir, followed by what appears to be a work of autofiction, as well as a set of digital recordings.
Under all circumstances, these testimonies are to be presented as a single communication. It is not possible to make sense of one without the others. This condition is non-negotiable. For the sake of truthfulness, as well as detail—and at personal risk—I have undergone hypnotic regression therapy in order to recall the information I wish to provide this office, but I am still human, or I was human, and to understand me one must understand the life I’ve lived, and I require that this be an accompaniment to the text.
Herewith, then, in preparation for its tri-continental publication, is an accurate representation of the sender’s findings. It is a document announcing the end of our world in 2050.
My name is Dr Naomi Buthelezi. The date is December 2, 2043. I am of sound mind and constitution and do not compose this account under duress. In a previous life, I worked as an author and writing instructor at the creative writing department of the University of Cape Town, where my career persisted on the strength of my having once been awarded both the Hugo and Nebula. I was a once-known/now-obscure science fiction writer, in other words, and assigned to this case through the office of Dr Hessler—an admirer I didn’t know I had.
The two of us met at the beginning of 2040, at a quiet soiree on campus. The astronomers in the department next to ours had installed a new 16-inch telescope in the observatory north of the grounds, and a few of us in English had been invited to celebrate with them before their doors opened.
Dr Hessler, or Joseph, as I came to know him, was the night’s guest of honor. He served as the chair and director of the South African National Space Agency, and had been asked to prepare a page for the evening’s opening remarks. He was well known. Having contributed to our space project for a decade and a half with committed service, he’d earned a place among the nation’s leaders in the field.
The gathering was modest, owing to the closed invitation. As the night wore on, I drank champagne out of a flute fashioned from a test tube and listened to my colleagues complain about ceaseless departmental meetings. I felt the same, but that didn’t make it less dull. My daughter was spending the weekend at a friend’s and I had a husband who was out of town for work—our relationship now openly at an impasse.
The speech was brief. After a second round of applause, I turned from my colleagues and found him smiling over the stage lights. His photograph was projected onto the walls. Then his hand was shuffled from the Head of Department’s to the Dean’s.
As he dismounted the podium, I realized I hadn’t heard a word the man had said—which made it all the stranger when he tapped me on the shoulder and told me he was an admirer.
“It’s a remarkable oeuvre,” he said, refreshing my test tube.
He asked me join him at his table. Sitting across from him, I took slow sips of champagne and tried to tell him what he wanted to know about the profession—about the novels I’d published and the ones I’d abandoned. The latter seemed to surprise him. The more we spoke, the more I understood that he viewed writers as both admirable and pitiful mammals—cubs that had been separated from the pack too soon and were now frail and prone to neurasthenia; feckless neurotics, to be blunt, ruined for a life among other people, but also, because of their wandering, gifted with more sights and smells and insights than was average.
Not that he was average. From the beginning, Hessler insisted on presenting himself as a sensitive, strong man—an adventurer, able to explore those same sights and smells and insights without the writer’s requisite softness; indeed, with hard science.
He told me he had one last question. “No, this one isn’t about writing,” he smiled. “It’s simpler. I want to know if life exists in other galaxies.”
I was caught off guard by the question and told him as much.
“I suppose that’s fair,” he sighed. He allowed a moment to pass. Then he said, “Two months ago, at our office in Hermanus, we received an unmarked package at our front desk. It was delivered by an anonymous courier, and inside, there was a locked drive containing audio recordings and printed manuscripts.”
“Manuscripts?”
Hessler nodded. “Two of them. In the beginning, we tried to dismiss it, of course. There’s nothing unusual about finding an eccentric in our mail haul. But from the beginning, this felt different. For one, an enormous amount of effort had gone into the materials. That much was clear. That’s why I didn’t mind them making the rounds in our office. Each of us engaged with them at one point or another, swapping the pages for the recordings and vice versa. I indulged it—a harmless morale booster, I thought.
“Then a narrative began to emerge and I paid closer attention. Right from the start, I’d been fascinated with how it presented itself as fact even as it veered into the fantastic.” Hessler paused to drain his test tube. “Until last week, that is, which is when it stopped being an entertainment.”
The room had grown louder. I leaned in. “What happened?”
“It predicted the present,” he said. “Now it might be a threat.”
I asked him what it had predicted and he took a moment to answer. “Last week’s bombing.”
I knew what he meant. An explosion had gone off on the face of Table Mountain, above the city bowl—that wide semi-oval that spread
