dust storm, powdering the streets in Tamboerskloof and Gardens below. So far, the authorities had no leads.
I decided to indulge him, and asked him to explain.
Hessler reached into his jacket pocket for his cell phone and showed me an image of the explosion site—four gouges in the cliff face. “This is a pattern. The explosions were detonated to form an insignia that’s referred to in the text.”
I studied the photograph. “It could be a coincidence.”
“I know, but it goes one better. It describes when and where the explosives were planted.”
I searched his face and he didn’t falter. Which is how I got involved.
Joseph confessed to having insisted on my invitation to the telescope opening, having planned on the two of us meeting. More details followed.
I waited a week as he gathered the pages and the recordings. When he drove up to campus to deliver them to me in person, he looked older, I thought, and more stooped under the merciless sunlight on Jammie Plaza. He declined an offer to cool down in the Arts Block, citing exhaustion, which from the look of him I couldn’t argue with. I took the materials and drove home.
Here, I want to be clear. Joseph was not an unstable man. He was fastidious, almost to a fault. From the beginning, he exercised an extreme amount of caution in dealing with what he knew. In fact, he was still wary, all of eight months later. Despite the mounting evidence on our side, he held off on committing to belief. In his emails to me, he insisted that we still had too much room for error. That was wise, given the implications of the text; if we were right, then the threat was far greater than terrorism—and its reach wider than our continent. We only had one chance to convince the State Security Agency; if our dossier wasn’t foolproof, it would fall into a bureaucratic loop that would block all further inquiries.
My task, then, was to investigate the veracity of the materials in your hands, reader—to extricate narrative allusions that might speak to a fictional grounding in the science fiction genre. In other words, I had to be as skeptical as I could bear to be as a fiction writer—which is a significant amount, most authors will attest. I took the task on, in other words, not knowing that I was hoping against hope.
The two of us worked well together. Even as Joseph’s health began to decline, we never lost our temper with each other—which is rare for me. In our email correspondence, our insights often overlapped, and when his pancreas condition worsened, two years into our work, I visited him in the hospital. After we’d greeted, he’d tell me to pull up a chair and update him on our progress.
It was becoming clear to both of us that we’d have to reconsider what to do with the material. We spent weeks in discussion, before deciding that our reach would have to stretch further than the government. It took another week before we decided to release this book, which I now dedicate to the sender of these materials, in gratitude for her service to humankind.
I also want to confess that I felt a sense of loss as I approached the end of this project. Not because I went home to a vacant house (my husband and I had separated by then; my daughter was at boarding school); not even because I’d lost a friend who was dear to me. It was a different sensation from mourning in that I no longer knew who or what I was. I told Joseph this one afternoon, two days before he died, and I still do not know. Not after what I have read in these pages. Except, perhaps, I know I was never qualified to handle an assignment of this nature and magnitude. This despite its modest beginnings at the SANSA office in Hermanus, where the materials were first dispatched, out of naïveté or shrewdness, I cannot tell.
Now I’m here, with half a decade of my life given to it, and with no regrets nor doubts.
There are three things I should mention before we begin. The first is that I have left the material intact, with most of my input restricted to formatting the testimonies as per the sender’s instructions. I have indicated where the written record and the recordings diverge; the section titles are also mine.
It’s also worth noting that the middle of the book operates in a manner that is distinct from the rest. Though our research has led us to believe that this section, titled “Five Weeks in the Plague,” is indeed a work of autofiction, it lacks the form’s traditional transparency. It is coded more than usual, no doubt for protection. For example, while we were able to discover that an eco-terrorist group did indeed plant the four explosives on the face of Table Mountain in 2026—timed to detonate only two decades later—the connection to the arts and the artists mentioned was never unearthed. Nor did we confirm the existence of a publication titled Obelisk. Furthermore, while no evidence exists of the alien sightings alluded to throughout the text, the Department of Social Development’s collusion with Cash Paymaster Services against their grantees has been well documented; and, the kidnapping of three teenage girls in King William’s Town gained national coverage in 2002.
Perhaps our most significant discovery, then, has been identifying and locating the records of the late Dr Marianne Dixon, who appears as herself in the text. Dixon earned her doctorate in cognitive neuroscience from Vassar in 1998. Her dissertation was on the topic of Jean Piaget’s theory of cognitive development as applied to the education models of apartheid South Africa. Dixon was unmarried and childless, which left us no descendants to contact for testimonies, and along with her colleagues in the field (now also deceased), she maintained a low profile. There are records, however, of her attempts to publish her findings in various journals over the years, and of her applying to secure audiences at conferences in Johannesburg, New Delhi, and New York—all of which were met with rejections. Unable to prove their claims, including the existence of extraterrestrial life, which would have required them to reveal their sources, Dixon and her colleagues were excommunicated from the field. This was on the heels of a scandal—enough to cement the damage—that alleged the researchers had misused a public grant to conduct unauthorized experiments on minors.
Dismissed by their peers, Dixon and her team continued as independent researchers. Their findings, disregarded by all established cognitive neuroscience journals, can now be found collated on their website, http://www.triangulum-earth.com, whose hosting has been paid up1, despite it not being updated in a decade. The text also explores the origins of the zones, or Delta Labor Camps as most of us know them, which are proliferating in every province—and which remain the nation’s most divisive issue, bringing me to my second point, which is the setting of the manuscript.
The reader will notice that the bulk of this narrative takes place in the Eastern Cape, once known as the Ciskei2 homeland, an apparatus of conquest implemented here by Europeans in the second millennium. This is the sender’s lineage and it is also mine.
That little has changed isn’t a deterrent, but a motivation for publication in 2044: to commemorate the demise of the homelands, as well as to encourage those lobbying against the state’s current plan to make the North West a zoned province—a marker of 50 years of progress, we’re told, since the abolition of apartheid. Which leads me to my third and final point.
I have not contacted the government. In the past, as related above, scientists and authorities have not heeded the message contained in this manuscript. It is also true that, in the end, Joseph and I concluded that the instruments of power could not be trusted with our future. Instead, our aim is to deliver it to the population, even though we do not know how events will unfold, and whether or not we will survive. The choice is ours. In the end, the sender intended this work for humankind, and it is only fitting, then,
