Score
63. Is Funds management currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
64. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
65. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
66. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
67. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Funds management changes?
<--- Score
68. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
69. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
70. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Funds management brings?
<--- Score
71. Are accountability and ownership for Funds management clearly defined?
<--- Score
72. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
73. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
74. What would be the goal or target for a Funds management’s improvement team?
<--- Score
75. When is/was the Funds management start date?
<--- Score
76. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
77. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
78. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
79. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Funds management?
<--- Score
80. Who is gathering Funds management information?
<--- Score
81. What is the scope?
<--- Score
82. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
83. How do you gather Funds management requirements?
<--- Score
84. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
85. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
86. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
87. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
88. How would you define Funds management leadership?
<--- Score
89. What is the context?
<--- Score
90. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
91. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
92. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
93. What sources do you use to gather information for a Funds management study?
<--- Score
94. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
95. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
96. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
97. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
98. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Funds management leverage and how?
<--- Score
99. How do you hand over Funds management context?
<--- Score
100. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
101. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
102. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
103. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Funds management results are met?
<--- Score
104. Is the Funds management scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
105. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
106. How often are the team meetings?
