Score
76. Do you need different information or graphics?
<--- Score
77. What is the extent or complexity of the Expert Software problem?
<--- Score
78. As a sponsor, customer or management, how important is it to meet goals, objectives?
<--- Score
79. Which needs are not included or involved?
<--- Score
80. Which information does the Expert Software business case need to include?
<--- Score
81. How many trainings, in total, are needed?
<--- Score
82. How can auditing be a preventative security measure?
<--- Score
83. What are the minority interests and what amount of minority interests can be recognized?
<--- Score
84. Are problem definition and motivation clearly presented?
<--- Score
85. What Expert Software capabilities do you need?
<--- Score
86. What needs to be done?
<--- Score
87. Are employees recognized for desired behaviors?
<--- Score
88. What prevents you from making the changes you know will make you a more effective Expert Software leader?
<--- Score
89. Who should resolve the Expert Software issues?
<--- Score
90. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Expert Software delivery, for example is new software needed?
<--- Score
91. Who needs budgets?
<--- Score
92. What activities does the governance board need to consider?
<--- Score
93. To what extent would your organization benefit from being recognized as a award recipient?
<--- Score
94. Do you know what you need to know about Expert Software?
<--- Score
95. How do you identify the kinds of information that you will need?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Expert Software Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
2. How do you think the partners involved in Expert Software would have defined success?
<--- Score
3. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
4. Has the Expert Software work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
5. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
6. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Expert Software results are met?
<--- Score
7. Are the Expert Software requirements testable?
<--- Score
8. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
9. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
10. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
11. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Expert Software work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
12. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
13. What system do you use for gathering Expert Software information?
<--- Score
14. Are the Expert Software requirements complete?
<--- Score
15. Is there a Expert Software management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
16. What is the scope?
<--- Score
17. What are the record-keeping requirements of Expert Software activities?
<--- Score
