How do you gather Robot simulations requirements?
<--- Score
103. What was the context?
<--- Score
104. Are accountability and ownership for Robot simulations clearly defined?
<--- Score
105. How do you catch Robot simulations definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
106. Is the scope of Robot simulations defined?
<--- Score
107. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
108. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
109. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
110. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
111. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
112. What system do you use for gathering Robot simulations information?
<--- Score
113. Is there a critical path to deliver Robot simulations results?
<--- Score
114. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Robot simulations changes?
<--- Score
115. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
116. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
117. Has the Robot simulations work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
118. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Robot simulations leverage and how?
<--- Score
119. What are the Robot simulations tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
120. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
121. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
122. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
123. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
124. Have all basic functions of Robot simulations been defined?
<--- Score
125. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
126. How do you think the partners involved in Robot simulations would have defined success?
<--- Score
127. Is the Robot simulations scope manageable?
<--- Score
128. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
129. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
130. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Robot simulations Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Are there any easy-to-implement alternatives to Robot simulations? Sometimes other solutions are available that do not require the cost implications of a full-blown project?
<--- Score
2. Are actual costs in line with budgeted costs?
<--- Score
3. Do you have an issue in getting priority?
<--- Score
4. How do you verify and develop ideas and innovations?
<--- Score
5. Who pays the cost?
<--- Score
6. Do you aggressively reward and promote the people who have the biggest impact on creating excellent Robot simulations services/products?
<--- Score
7. What is your Robot simulations quality cost segregation study?
<--- Score
8. How will measures be used to manage and adapt?
<--- Score
9. How can you reduce costs?
<--- Score
10. Are
