Score
109. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
110. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
111. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
112. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Green technologies work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
113. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
114. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
115. What was the context?
<--- Score
116. Has the Green technologies work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
117. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
118. Is the Green technologies scope manageable?
<--- Score
119. How are consistent Green technologies definitions important?
<--- Score
120. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
121. Will a Green technologies production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
122. Is Green technologies currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
123. Who approved the Green technologies scope?
<--- Score
124. What system do you use for gathering Green technologies information?
<--- Score
125. What is the context?
<--- Score
126. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
127. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
128. Is Green technologies linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
129. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
130. Is the scope of Green technologies defined?
<--- Score
131. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
132. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
133. Are the Green technologies requirements complete?
<--- Score
134. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
135. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
136. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Green technologies changes?
<--- Score
137. Do you all define Green technologies in the same way?
<--- Score
138. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
139. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Green technologies Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What can be used to verify compliance?
<--- Score
2. Do you aggressively reward and promote the people who have the biggest impact on creating excellent Green technologies services/products?
<--- Score
3. What harm might be caused?
<--- Score
4. What methods are feasible and acceptable to estimate the impact of reforms?
<--- Score
5. Which measures and indicators matter?
<--- Score
6. What are the estimated costs of proposed changes?
<--- Score
7. How
