Risk Assessments A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Risk Assessments A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk страница 5

Risk Assessments A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk

Скачать книгу

Score

      74. How are the Risk assessments’s objectives aligned to the group’s overall stakeholder strategy?

      <--- Score

      75. Why is this needed?

      <--- Score

      76. Who needs what information?

      <--- Score

      77. What information do users need?

      <--- Score

      78. What creative shifts do you need to take?

      <--- Score

      79. Why the need?

      <--- Score

      80. Do you manipulate your audit reports based on events of interest without altering the content of the logs?

      <--- Score

      81. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Risk assessments delivery, for example is new software needed?

      <--- Score

      Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

      Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

      Transfer your score to the Risk assessments Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

      CRITERION #2: DEFINE:

      INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.

      In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

      5 Strongly Agree

      4 Agree

      3 Neutral

      2 Disagree

      1 Strongly Disagree

      1. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      2. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      3. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Risk assessments?

      <--- Score

      4. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      5. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      6. Will a Risk assessments production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      7. Is Risk assessments currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      8. How do you think the partners involved in Risk assessments would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      9. Who are the Risk assessments improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      10. When is/was the Risk assessments start date?

      <--- Score

      11. How do you gather the stories?

      <--- Score

      12. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      13. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      14. How does the Risk assessments manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      15. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      16. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Risk assessments work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      17. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      18. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      19. Do you all define Risk assessments in the same way?

      <--- Score

      20. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      21. Are improvement team members fully trained on Risk assessments?

      <--- Score

      22. What is the definition of Risk assessments excellence?

      <--- Score

      23. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      24. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

      <--- Score

      25. Is the Risk assessments scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      26. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      27. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

      <--- Score

      28. What are (control) requirements for Risk assessments Information?

      <--- Score

      29. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      30. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      31. Is the Risk assessments scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      32. Has

Скачать книгу